Literature DB >> 27735826

Combining Clinical and Pathologic Staging Variables Has Prognostic Value in Predicting Local-regional Recurrence Following Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer.

Jose Vila1, Mediget Teshome, Susan L Tucker, Wendy A Woodward, Mariana Chavez-MacGregor, Kelly K Hunt, Elizabeth A Mittendorf.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The current study was undertaken to determine if the CPS+EG score could stratify patients with respect to local-regional recurrence (LRR).
BACKGROUND: We previously defined and validated a novel breast cancer staging system incorporating the American Joint Committee on Cancer clinical stage (CS), final pathologic stage (PS), estrogen receptor status (E), and nuclear grade (G) (CPS+EG score). The score is associated with disease-specific survival outcomes in patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
METHODS: Patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy between 1997 and 2005 were identified and clinicopathologic data were used to determine the CPS+EG score. Type of local therapy, breast-conserving therapy, mastectomy alone, or mastectomy followed by postmastectomy radiation therapy was recorded. Multivariate analysis, including CPS+EG score and local therapy, was performed to evaluate for association with LRR.
RESULTS: Of 1697 patients, breast conserving therapy was performed in 656 (39%), mastectomy in 297 (17%) and mastectomy + postmastectomy radiation therapy in 744 (44%). At a median follow-up of 49 months, the crude incidence of LRR was 6.5%. Freedom from LRR at 5 years ranged from 86% to 97% by clinical stage, 86% to 97% by pathologic stage, and 71% to 99% by CPS+EG score. On multivariate analysis, CPS+EG score and surgery type were independently associated with LRR, with increased risk among patients with CPS+EG scores of 3 or greater (HR 1.94, 95% CI 1.04-3.63) or mastectomy alone (HR 2.14, 95% CI 1.26-3.63).
CONCLUSIONS: The CPS+EG staging system better stratifies patients with respect to LRR after neoadjuvant chemotherapy than presenting clinical stage or final pathologic stage. For CPS+EG scores ≥3, use of postmastectomy radiation therapy decreases the likelihood of LRR after mastectomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27735826     DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001492

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  10 in total

1.  Locoregional risk assessment after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with primary breast cancer: clinical utility of the CPS + EG score.

Authors:  Laura L Michel; Laura Sommer; Rosa González Silos; Justo Lorenzo Bermejo; Alexandra von Au; Julia Seitz; André Hennigs; Katharina Smetanay; Michael Golatta; Jörg Heil; Florian Schütz; Christof Sohn; Andreas Schneeweiss; Frederik Marmé
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2019-06-24       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 2.  Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer-background for the indication of locoregional treatment.

Authors:  David Krug; René Baumann; Wilfried Budach; Jürgen Dunst; Petra Feyer; Rainer Fietkau; Wulf Haase; Wolfgang Harms; Thomas Hehr; Marc D Piroth; Felix Sedlmayer; Rainer Souchon; Frederik Wenz; Rolf Sauer
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2018-07-04       Impact factor: 3.621

3.  Incorporating Tumor Characteristics to the American Joint Committee on Cancer Breast Cancer Staging System.

Authors:  Mariana Chavez-MacGregor; Elizabeth A Mittendorf; Christina A Clarke; Daphne Y Lichtensztajn; Kelly K Hunt; Sharon H Giordano
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2017-06-07

4.  Locoregional recurrence-associated factors and risk-adapted postmastectomy radiotherapy for breast cancer staged in cT1-2N0-1 after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Xin Wang; Liming Xu; Zhenzhen Yin; Daquan Wang; Qi Wang; Kunpeng Xu; Jinlin Zhao; Lujun Zhao; Zhiyong Yuan; Ping Wang
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2018-10-02       Impact factor: 3.989

5.  Tumor location of the central and nipple portion is associated with impaired survival for women with breast cancer.

Authors:  Fei Ji; Wei-Kai Xiao; Ci-Qiu Yang; Mei Yang; Liu-Lu Zhang; Hong-Fei Gao; Yu-Feng Lin; Teng Zhu; Min-Yi Cheng; Wei-Ping Li; Wei-Jun Pan; Xiao-Sheng Zhuang; Kun Wang
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2019-04-09       Impact factor: 3.989

6.  Can a subgroup at high risk for LRR be identified from T1-2 breast cancer with negative lymph nodes after mastectomy? A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Gongling Peng; Zhuohui Zhou; Ming Jiang; Fan Yang
Journal:  Biosci Rep       Date:  2019-09-20       Impact factor: 3.840

7.  Diverse Distribution and Gene Expression on the 21-Gene Recurrence Assay in Breast Cancer Patients with Locoregional Recurrence Versus Distant Metastasis.

Authors:  Yujie Lu; Yiwei Tong; Jiahui Huang; Lin Lin; Jiayi Wu; Xiaochun Fei; Xiaosong Chen; Kunwei Shen
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2021-08-10       Impact factor: 3.989

8.  Real-world outcomes for Chinese breast cancer patients with tumor location of central and nipple portion.

Authors:  Wei-Da Fu; Xiao-Hui Wang; Kang-Kang Lu; Yi-Qiao Lu; Jie-Yu Zhou; Qi-Di Huang; Gui-Long Guo
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-10-03

9.  A Phase II Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Sunitinib Malate in Combination With Weekly Paclitaxel Followed by Doxorubicin and Daily Oral Cyclophosphamide Plus G-CSF as Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Locally Advanced or Inflammatory Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Lynn Symonds; Isaac Jenkins; Hannah M Linden; Brenda Kurland; Julie R Gralow; Vijayakrishna V K Gadi; Georgiana K Ellis; Qian Wu; Eve Rodler; Pavani Chalasani; Xiaoyu Chai; Jinny Riedel; Alison Stopeck; Ursa Brown-Glaberman; Jennifer M Specht
Journal:  Clin Breast Cancer       Date:  2021-05-24       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  Thermal tomography for monitoring tumor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in women with locally advanced breast cancer.

Authors:  Qi Wu; Juanjuan Li; Si Sun; Xiaoli Yao; Shan Zhu; Juan Wu; Qian Liu; Xiaojun Ding; Manman Shi; Kaiyang Li; Shengrong Sun
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-03-25
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.