Literature DB >> 34158046

Key changes to improve social presence of a virtual health assistant promoting colorectal cancer screening informed by a technology acceptance model.

Melissa J Vilaro1, Danyell S Wilson-Howard2, Mohan S Zalake3, Fatemeh Tavassoli3, Benjamin C Lok3, François P Modave4, Thomas J George5, Folakemi Odedina6, Peter J Carek7, Janice L Krieger8.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Understanding how older, minoritized patients attend to cues when interacting with web-based health messages may provide opportunities to improve engagement with novel health technologies. We assess acceptance-promoting and acceptance-inhibiting cues of a web-based, intervention promoting colorectal cancer (CRC) screening with a home stool test among Black women.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Focus group and individual interview data informed iterative changes to a race- and gender-concordant virtual health assistant (VHA). A user-centered design approach was used across 3 iterations to identify changes needed to activate cues described as important; such as portraying authority and expertise. Questionnaire data were analyzed using non-parametric tests for perceptions of cues. Analysis was guided by the Technology Acceptance Model.
RESULTS: Perceptions of interactivity, social presence, expertise, and trust were important cues in a VHA-delivered intervention promoting CRC screening. Features of the web-based platform related to ease of navigation and use were also discussed. Participant comments varied across the 3 iterations and indicated acceptance of or a desire to improve source cues for subsequent iterations. We highlight the specific key changes made at each of three iterative versions of the interactive intervention in conjunction with user perception of changes. DISCUSSION: Virtual agents can be adapted to better meet patient expectations such as being a trustworthy and expert source. Across three evolving versions of a Black, VHA, cues for social presence were particularly important. Social presence cues helped patients engage with CRC screening messages delivered in this novel digital context.
CONCLUSIONS: When using a VHA to disseminate health information, cues associated with acceptability can be leveraged and adapted as needed for diverse audiences. Patient characteristics (age, identity, health status) are important to note as they may affect perceptions of a novel health technologies ease of use and relevancy according to the leading models.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Colorectal cancer screening; Rural health; Technology acceptance model; Virtual agent; Web-based intervention

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34158046     DOI: 10.1186/s12911-021-01549-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak        ISSN: 1472-6947            Impact factor:   2.796


  16 in total

1.  Knowledge of, attitudes toward, and barriers to participation of colorectal cancer screening tests in the Asia-Pacific region: a multicenter study.

Authors:  Jenn Hian Koo; Rupert W L Leong; Jessica Ching; Khay-Guan Yeoh; Deng-Chyang Wu; Abdullah Murdani; Quancai Cai; Han-Mo Chiu; Vui Heng Chong; Rungsun Rerknimitr; Khean-Lee Goh; Ida Hilmi; Jeong-Sik Byeon; Saad K Niaz; Arif Siddique; Kai Chun Wu; Takahisa Matsuda; Govind Makharia; Jose Sollano; Sang-Kil Lee; Joseph J Y Sung
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 9.427

Review 2.  Inclusion of underserved racial and ethnic groups in cancer intervention research using new media: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Hayley S Thompson; Rachel C Shelton; Jamie Mitchell; Tara Eaton; Pamela Valera; Anne Katz
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2013-12

3.  Gerontechnology acceptance by elderly Hong Kong Chinese: a senior technology acceptance model (STAM).

Authors:  Ke Chen; Alan Hoi Shou Chan
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  2014-03-24       Impact factor: 2.778

4.  Colorectal cancer screening disparities for rural minorities in the United States.

Authors:  Allison M Cole; J Elizabeth Jackson; Mark Doescher
Journal:  J Prim Care Community Health       Date:  2012-10-15

5.  Influence of family history and preventive health behaviors on colorectal cancer screening in African Americans.

Authors:  Kathleen A Griffith; Deborah B McGuire; Renee Royak-Schaler; Keith O Plowden; Eileen K Steinberger
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2008-07-15       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Comparative effectiveness of fecal immunochemical test outreach, colonoscopy outreach, and usual care for boosting colorectal cancer screening among the underserved: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Samir Gupta; Ethan A Halm; Don C Rockey; Marcia Hammons; Mark Koch; Elizabeth Carter; Luisa Valdez; Liyue Tong; Chul Ahn; Michael Kashner; Keith Argenbright; Jasmin Tiro; Zhuo Geng; Sandi Pruitt; Celette Sugg Skinner
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2013-10-14       Impact factor: 21.873

Review 7.  Predictors of colorectal cancer screening behaviors among average-risk older adults in the United States.

Authors:  Hind A Beydoun; May A Beydoun
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2007-12-18       Impact factor: 2.506

Review 8.  A Systematic Review of Cost-Effectiveness Studies Reporting Cost-per-DALY Averted.

Authors:  Peter J Neumann; Teja Thorat; Yue Zhong; Jordan Anderson; Megan Farquhar; Mark Salem; Eileen Sandberg; Cayla J Saret; Colby Wilkinson; Joshua T Cohen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-12-22       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  COVID-19 in the Long-Term Care Setting: The CMS Perspective.

Authors:  Alan F Levitt; Shari M Ling
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2020-06-12       Impact factor: 5.562

10.  Rural eHealth nutrition education for limited-income families: an iterative and user-centered design approach.

Authors:  Nancy L Atkinson; Sandra L Saperstein; Sharon M Desmond; Robert S Gold; Amy S Billing; Jing Tian
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2009-06-22       Impact factor: 5.428

View more
  1 in total

1.  Communicating risk to promote colorectal cancer screening: a multi-method study to test tailored versus targeted message strategies.

Authors:  Jordan M Neil; Naomi D Parker; Yulia A Levites Strekalova; Kyle Duke; Thomas George; Janice L Krieger
Journal:  Health Educ Res       Date:  2022-03-24
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.