BACKGROUND: Despite the existence of effective screening, colorectal cancer remains the second leading cause of cancer death in the United States. Adults living in rural areas and members of minority populations both experience disparities in colorectal cancer screening. METHODS: Cross-sectional prevalence study of Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System from the Centers for Disease Control from 1998 to 2005. PRIMARY OUTCOME: Predicted probability of reporting timely colorectal cancer screening. INDEPENDENT VARIABLES: rural residence, race/ethnicity. We adjusted for demographic and socioeconomic characteristics of respondents. RESULTS: After adjustment rural non-Hispanic whites (44.3%), rural African American/blacks (44.8%), urban and rural Hispanic/Latinos (43.7% and 40.8%, respectively), urban and rural American Indian/Alaska Natives (45.8% and 46.8%), and urban and rural Asians (35.4% and 39.6%) had lower compared with urban non-Hispanic whites (49.5%; P < .05% for all comparisons). Urban Asians were least likely to report use of fecal occult blood testing (8.6%, 95% confidence interval = 6.3% to 10.9%) and rural Asians were least likely to report use of endoscopy screening (21.2%, 95% confidence interval = 16.2% to 26.2%). DISCUSSION: Rural minorities may face different barriers to colorectal cancer screening than urban minorities or rural non-Hispanic whites. Further research to develop interventions to improve screening in these populations is warranted.
BACKGROUND: Despite the existence of effective screening, colorectal cancer remains the second leading cause of cancer death in the United States. Adults living in rural areas and members of minority populations both experience disparities in colorectal cancer screening. METHODS: Cross-sectional prevalence study of Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System from the Centers for Disease Control from 1998 to 2005. PRIMARY OUTCOME: Predicted probability of reporting timely colorectal cancer screening. INDEPENDENT VARIABLES: rural residence, race/ethnicity. We adjusted for demographic and socioeconomic characteristics of respondents. RESULTS: After adjustment rural non-Hispanic whites (44.3%), rural African American/blacks (44.8%), urban and rural Hispanic/Latinos (43.7% and 40.8%, respectively), urban and rural American Indian/Alaska Natives (45.8% and 46.8%), and urban and rural Asians (35.4% and 39.6%) had lower compared with urban non-Hispanic whites (49.5%; P < .05% for all comparisons). Urban Asians were least likely to report use of fecal occult blood testing (8.6%, 95% confidence interval = 6.3% to 10.9%) and rural Asians were least likely to report use of endoscopy screening (21.2%, 95% confidence interval = 16.2% to 26.2%). DISCUSSION: Rural minorities may face different barriers to colorectal cancer screening than urban minorities or rural non-Hispanic whites. Further research to develop interventions to improve screening in these populations is warranted.
Entities:
Keywords:
colorectal cancer; health disparities; prevention; rural health; screening
Authors: Stephanie B Wheeler; Jennifer Leeman; Kristen Hassmiller Lich; Florence K L Tangka; Melinda M Davis; Lisa C Richardson Journal: Cancer J Date: 2018 May/Jun Impact factor: 3.360
Authors: Whitney E Zahnd; Aimee S James; Wiley D Jenkins; Sonya R Izadi; Amanda J Fogleman; David E Steward; Graham A Colditz; Laurent Brard Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2017-07-27 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Julia T Caldwell; Chandra L Ford; Steven P Wallace; May C Wang; Lois M Takahashi Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2016-06-16 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Smita Bhatia; Wendy Landier; Electra D Paskett; Katherine B Peters; Janette K Merrill; Jonathan Phillips; Raymond U Osarogiagbon Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2022-07-11 Impact factor: 11.816
Authors: Michael P Pignone; Trisha M Crutchfield; Paul M Brown; Sarah T Hawley; Jane L Laping; Carmen L Lewis; Kristen Hassmiller Lich; Lisa C Richardson; Florence Kl Tangka; Stephanie B Wheeler Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2014-11-30 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Melissa J Vilaro; Danyell S Wilson-Howard; Mohan S Zalake; Fatemeh Tavassoli; Benjamin C Lok; François P Modave; Thomas J George; Folakemi Odedina; Peter J Carek; Janice L Krieger Journal: BMC Med Inform Decis Mak Date: 2021-06-22 Impact factor: 2.796
Authors: Jessica L Krok-Schoen; Mira L Katz; Jill M Oliveri; Gregory S Young; Michael L Pennell; Paul L Reiter; Jesse J Plascak; Michael D Slater; Janice L Krieger; Cathy M Tatum; Electra D Paskett Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2015-10-05 Impact factor: 3.411