Kate P Hutchins1, David N Borg2, Aaron J E Bach3, Joshua J Bon4,5, Geoffrey M Minett6, Ian B Stewart6. 1. Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia. k.hutchins@qut.edu.au. 2. The Hopkins Centre, Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia. 3. The National Climate Change Adaption Research Facility, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Australia. 4. School of Mathematical Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia. 5. Australian Centre of Excellence for Mathematical and Statistical Frontiers, Brisbane, Australia. 6. Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Despite an increasing rate of women participating in professional sports, emergency services, and military settings where they are exposed to exertional heat stress, our understanding of female thermoregulation and the detrimental effects of heat on women's performance, especially regarding the menstrual cycle, is limited. This review aimed to quantify the representation of women in exercise thermoregulation research between 2010 and 2019 and the frequency that these articles reported details pertaining to female participants' menstrual cycle to determine the volume of novel research that is directly relevant to this growing population. METHODS: Original exercise thermoregulatory studies published in three major sports medicine databases (PubMed, MEDLINE, and SPORTDiscus) between 2010 and 2019 were surveyed. Articles were screened to determine the number of female and male participants in the study and whether studies involving women reported menstrual orientation or phase. Research involving healthy adult participants and an exercise protocol with a thermoregulatory outcome measure were included in the review. RESULTS: A total of 1407 articles were included in the review, involving 28,030 participants. The annual representation of women ranged from a mean of 11.6% [95% credible interval (CI); 9.2, 14.3] to 17.8% [95% CI; 15.2, 20.6] across the 10 years, indicating studies predominantly included men. Nonetheless, there was a small statistical increase in the overall proportion of women, with a mean overall proportion change of 0.7% [95% CI; 0.2, 1.2] per year. The increase appeared to be driven by a reduction in the number of studies including only men, rather than studies including more women alongside men, or increased women-only studies. Less than one third of articles involving women reported the menstrual orientation of participants and less than one quarter reported both menstrual orientation and phase. This study shows that women were proportionally underrepresented in exercise thermoregulation research during the past decade and the majority of studies did not report menstrual cycle details of female participants. Researchers should consider including women in future work where their inclusion could contribute meaningful data that enhance the evidence-based and ultimately improves our comprehension of women's thermal physiology.
BACKGROUND: Despite an increasing rate of women participating in professional sports, emergency services, and military settings where they are exposed to exertional heat stress, our understanding of female thermoregulation and the detrimental effects of heat on women's performance, especially regarding the menstrual cycle, is limited. This review aimed to quantify the representation of women in exercise thermoregulation research between 2010 and 2019 and the frequency that these articles reported details pertaining to female participants' menstrual cycle to determine the volume of novel research that is directly relevant to this growing population. METHODS: Original exercise thermoregulatory studies published in three major sports medicine databases (PubMed, MEDLINE, and SPORTDiscus) between 2010 and 2019 were surveyed. Articles were screened to determine the number of female and male participants in the study and whether studies involving women reported menstrual orientation or phase. Research involving healthy adult participants and an exercise protocol with a thermoregulatory outcome measure were included in the review. RESULTS: A total of 1407 articles were included in the review, involving 28,030 participants. The annual representation of women ranged from a mean of 11.6% [95% credible interval (CI); 9.2, 14.3] to 17.8% [95% CI; 15.2, 20.6] across the 10 years, indicating studies predominantly included men. Nonetheless, there was a small statistical increase in the overall proportion of women, with a mean overall proportion change of 0.7% [95% CI; 0.2, 1.2] per year. The increase appeared to be driven by a reduction in the number of studies including only men, rather than studies including more women alongside men, or increased women-only studies. Less than one third of articles involving women reported the menstrual orientation of participants and less than one quarter reported both menstrual orientation and phase. This study shows that women were proportionally underrepresented in exercise thermoregulation research during the past decade and the majority of studies did not report menstrual cycle details of female participants. Researchers should consider including women in future work where their inclusion could contribute meaningful data that enhance the evidence-based and ultimately improves our comprehension of women's thermal physiology.
Entities:
Keywords:
Exertional heat stress; Menstrual cycle; Performance; Sex differences; Temperature
Authors: Gabrielle E W Giersch; Margaret C Morrissey; Rachel K Katch; Abigail T Colburn; Stacy T Sims; Nina S Stachenfeld; Douglas J Casa Journal: J Sci Med Sport Date: 2020-05-23 Impact factor: 4.319
Authors: Janet W Rich-Edwards; Ursula B Kaiser; Grace L Chen; JoAnn E Manson; Jill M Goldstein Journal: Endocr Rev Date: 2018-08-01 Impact factor: 19.871
Authors: Karine Naves Oliveira Goulart; Cândido Celso Coimbra; Helton Oliveira Campos; Lucas Rios Drummond; Pedro Henrique Madureira Ogando; Georgia Brown; Bruno Pena Couto; Rob Duffield; Samuel Penna Wanner Journal: Sports Med Open Date: 2022-06-03
Authors: Ella S Smith; Alannah K A McKay; Megan Kuikman; Kathryn E Ackerman; Rachel Harris; Kirsty J Elliott-Sale; Trent Stellingwerff; Louise M Burke Journal: Nutrients Date: 2022-02-23 Impact factor: 5.717
Authors: Ella S Smith; Alannah K A McKay; Megan Kuikman; Kathryn E Ackerman; Rachel Harris; Kirsty J Elliott-Sale; Trent Stellingwerff; Louise M Burke Journal: Nutrients Date: 2022-08-17 Impact factor: 6.706