| Literature DB >> 34154405 |
Jaime E Zlamal1, Semen A Leyn1, Mallika Iyer1, Marinela L Elane1, Nicholas A Wong1, James W Wamsley1, Maarten Vercruysse2, Fernando Garcia-Alcalde2, Andrei L Osterman1.
Abstract
Resistance to the broad-spectrum antibiotic ciprofloxacin is detected at high rates for a wide range of bacterial pathogens. To investigate the dynamics ofEntities:
Keywords: Gram-negative bacteria; antibiotic resistance; ciprofloxacin; experimental evolution; morbidostat
Year: 2021 PMID: 34154405 PMCID: PMC8262867 DOI: 10.1128/mBio.00987-21
Source DB: PubMed Journal: mBio Impact factor: 7.867
FIG 1(a to e) Morbidostat design (a), control logics (b), and examples of evolutionary runs of E. coli (c), A. baumannii (d), and P. aeruginosa (e) with ciprofloxacin. (a) Bacterial populations are continuously cultured in a 20-ml glass tube (bioreactor) with magnetic stirring and three input lines: filtered air (blue) and media from two feed bottles, with and without a concentrated drug (purple and green, respectively). The growth (turbidity) is monitored using a laser beam and diode light sensor. Upon periodic addition of 2 to 4 ml medium from the first or the second feed bottle (as defined by control logic, see B), the excess volume is displaced by airflow into a waste bottle. Samples (up to 10 ml) are taken periodically (1 to 2 times per day) through a dedicated sampling port. Our current morbidostat implementation includes 6 parallel bioreactors with individual feed lines that are independently monitored and controlled by the Arduino board with a Windows PC-based user interface. (b) Morbidostat logic is controlled by an Arduino board based on the principles described by Toprak et al. (27) using the real-time OD input from each bioreactor and predefined run parameters: a lower threshold (LT), a drug threshold (DT), and a cycle time (time between dilutions, typically 10 to 20 min when the OD is greater than the LT). Depending on the conditions shown in the diagram, one of the two peristaltic pumps (feeding media with or without drug) are engaged at the beginning of each dilution outgrowth cycle. (c to e) Representative OD profiles (black line) and calculated drug concentration profiles (red line) observed during the course of the experimental evolution of E. coli, A. baumannii, and P. aeruginosa toward resistance against ciprofloxacin (CIP). One of the reactors is shown for each organism, while evolutionary profiles for all other experiments and reactors are provided in Fig. S2. The right axis shows the CIP concentration (times the MIC) as a fold change from the MICs for respective unevolved strains.
FIG 2(a to f) Population dynamics of the experimental evolution of ciprofloxacin resistance in E. coli (a, b), A. baumannii (c, d), and P. aeruginosa (e, f). The frequency of major mutations (reaching ≥5%) in evolving bacterial populations is shown as a function of time for selected reactors. The results of selected reactors are shown, as follows: reactor 4 from CEC-2 (a); reactor 5 from CEC-4 (b); reactor 5 from CAB (c); reactor 6 from CAB (d); reactor 5 from PAC-1 (e); and reactor 6 from PAC-2 (f).
FIG 3Amino acid substitutions in GyrA (pink chain)/GyrB (blue chain) observed during the course of the morbidostat-based experimental evolution of CIP resistance in E. coli (EC; red text), A. baumannii (AB; blue text), and P. aeruginosa (PA; green text) mapped on a three-dimensional structure (PDB accession number 6RKW). The ciprofloxacin molecule (blue) and Mg2+ ion (green) were added by structural alignment of 6RKW with the structure of Mycobacterium tuberculosis gyrase bound to CIP (PDB accession number 5BTC). The substitution equivalent to P. aeruginosa GyrB:Leu128Pro is not shown. It is located near the ATP-binding site of GyrB. Chain A of 6RKW was aligned to chain A of 5BTC using FATCAT. The same rotation translation was then applied to all chains in 6RKW to align the full structure.
FIG 4Mutations leading to upregulation of the efflux machinery in Escherichia coli (a), Acinetobacter baumannii (b), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (c) detected over the course of the experimental evolution of CIP resistance. The total number of distinct variants detected in at least one of the reactors is shown under the color-coded upward-pointing triangles indicating a type of mutation.
Major mutational variants detected in the course of the experimental evolution of ciprofloxacin resistance
| Target(s) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variant | Max. freq. (%) | No. of reactors (out of 10) | Variant | Max. freq. (%) | No. of reactors (out of 5) | Variant | Max. freq. (%) | No. of reactors (out of 12) | |
| Primary | |||||||||
| GyrA, DNA gyrase subunit A | Ser83Leu | 98 | 1 | Ser81Leu | 99 | 5 | Thr83Ile | 100 | 12 |
| Asp87Asn | 17 | 1 | Asp87Asn | 79 | 2 | ||||
| Asp87Tyr | 99 | 4 | Asp87Tyr | 52 | 1 | ||||
| Asp87Gly | 74 | 6 | |||||||
| Ala119Glu | 7 | 2 | |||||||
| GyrB, DNA gyrase subunit B | Ser464Phe | 96 | 6 | Leu128Pro | 7 | 1 | |||
| Ser464Tyr | 99 | 4 | Ser466Phe | 63 | 4 | ||||
| Secondary | |||||||||
| ParC, topoisomerase IV subunit A | Ser84Leu | 36 | 4 | Ser87Leu | 53 | 6 | |||
| Glu88Lys | 86 | 2 | |||||||
| Asn334Tyr | 4 | 1 | |||||||
| ParE, topoisomerase IV subunit B | Leu121Pro | 8 | 1 | ||||||
| Ser457Gly | 6 | 1 | |||||||
| Ser457Cys | 17 | 1 | |||||||
| Ser457_insArg | 9 | 1 | |||||||
| Val460Gly | 62 | 2 | |||||||
| Efflux pump deregulation | 86 | 9 | 28 | 5 | 90 | 12 | |||
| 95 | 9 | 72 | 4 | 39 | 1 | ||||
| 10 | 2 | 36 | 4 | 12 | 5 | ||||
| 63 | 9 | 6 | 1 | ||||||
| 53 | 3 | 94 | 7 | ||||||
| Other strongly implicated genes | 98 | 11 | |||||||
| 37 | 2 | ||||||||
| 27 | 3 | ||||||||
Listed mutations that reached ≥5% in at least in one reactor and one time point.
Maximum observed frequency reached at any time point in any reactor.
Disruptive mutations (mainly frameshifts, stops, small indels, and IS elements).
FIG 5Trajectories and stages in the experimental evolution of CIP resistance in E. coli (top), A. baumannii (middle), and P. aeruginosa (bottom). Major driver mutations are shown in color-coded boxes, with missense mutations in targets (green and blue) and disruptive mutations in efflux regulators (yellow and brown). Additional potentially relevant mutations detected in populations but not in isolated clones are shown on a gray background.