Literature DB >> 34151976

Towards gender equity in artificial intelligence and machine learning applications in dermatology.

Michelle S Lee1,2, Lisa N Guo1,2, Vinod E Nambudiri1,2.   

Abstract

There has been increased excitement around the use of machine learning (ML) and artificial intelligence (AI) in dermatology for the diagnosis of skin cancers and assessment of other dermatologic conditions. As these technologies continue to expand, it is essential to ensure they do not create or widen sex- and gender-based disparities in care. While desirable bias may result from the explicit inclusion of sex or gender in diagnostic criteria of diseases with gender-based differences, undesirable biases can result from usage of datasets with an underrepresentation of certain groups. We believe that sex and gender differences should be taken into consideration in ML/AI algorithms in dermatology because there are important differences in the epidemiology and clinical presentation of dermatologic conditions including skin cancers, sex-specific cancers, and autoimmune conditions. We present recommendations for ensuring sex and gender equity in the development of ML/AI tools in dermatology to increase desirable bias and avoid undesirable bias.
© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Medical Informatics Association. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  artificial intelligence; dermatology; disparities; equity; gender; machine learning

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 34151976      PMCID: PMC8757299          DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocab113

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc        ISSN: 1067-5027            Impact factor:   7.942


  26 in total

1.  Issues in transgender dermatology: A systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Patrick Sullivan; John Trinidad; Dathan Hamann
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2019-03-15       Impact factor: 11.527

Review 2.  Machine Learning and Health Care Disparities in Dermatology.

Authors:  Adewole S Adamson; Avery Smith
Journal:  JAMA Dermatol       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 10.282

3.  Malignant melanoma of the vulva in a nationwide, 25-year study of 219 Swedish females: clinical observations and histopathologic features.

Authors:  B K Ragnarsson-Olding; L R Kanter-Lewensohn; B Lagerlöf; B R Nilsson; U K Ringborg
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1999-10-01       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Incidence of systemic sclerosis in Allegheny County, Pennsylvania. A twenty-year study of hospital-diagnosed cases, 1963-1982.

Authors:  V D Steen; C V Oddis; C G Conte; J Janoski; G Z Casterline; T A Medsger
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  1997-03

5.  Dermatologist-level classification of skin cancer with deep neural networks.

Authors:  Andre Esteva; Brett Kuprel; Roberto A Novoa; Justin Ko; Susan M Swetter; Helen M Blau; Sebastian Thrun
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2017-01-25       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  A novel and robust Bayesian approach for segmentation of psoriasis lesions and its risk stratification.

Authors:  Vimal K Shrivastava; Narendra D Londhe; Rajendra S Sonawane; Jasjit S Suri
Journal:  Comput Methods Programs Biomed       Date:  2017-08-03       Impact factor: 5.428

7.  Association Between Sexual Orientation and Lifetime Prevalence of Skin Cancer in the United States.

Authors:  Sean Singer; Elizabeth Tkachenko; Rebecca I Hartman; Arash Mostaghimi
Journal:  JAMA Dermatol       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 10.282

8.  A feature fusion system for basal cell carcinoma detection through data-driven feature learning and patient profile.

Authors:  P Kharazmi; S Kalia; H Lui; Z J Wang; T K Lee
Journal:  Skin Res Technol       Date:  2017-10-22       Impact factor: 2.365

Review 9.  Characterizing the role of dermatologists in developing artificial intelligence for assessment of skin cancer.

Authors:  George A Zakhem; Joseph W Fakhoury; Catherine C Motosko; Roger S Ho
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2020-01-20       Impact factor: 11.527

10.  Gender imbalance in medical imaging datasets produces biased classifiers for computer-aided diagnosis.

Authors:  Agostina J Larrazabal; Nicolás Nieto; Victoria Peterson; Diego H Milone; Enzo Ferrante
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-05-26       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  2 in total

1.  Informatics for sex- and gender-related health: understanding the problems, developing new methods, and designing new solutions.

Authors:  Mary Regina Boland; Noémie Elhadad; Wanda Pratt
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2022-01-12       Impact factor: 7.942

Review 2.  Consequences of inequity in the neurosurgical workforce: Lessons from traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Shivani Venkatesh; Marcela Bravo; Tory Schaaf; Michael Koller; Kiera Sundeen; Uzma Samadani
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-09-01
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.