Literature DB >> 34151513

A mixed effects model for analyzing area under the curve of longitudinally measured biomarkers with missing data.

Luoxi Shi1, Dorothy K Hatsukami2,3, Joseph S Koopmeiners1, Chap T Le1, Neal L Benowitz4, Eric C Donny5, Xianghua Luo1,2.   

Abstract

A simple approach for analyzing longitudinally measured biomarkers is to calculate summary measures such as the area under the curve (AUC) for each individual and then compare the mean AUC between treatment groups using methods such as t test. This two-step approach is difficult to implement when there are missing data since the AUC cannot be directly calculated for individuals with missing measurements. Simple methods for dealing with missing data include the complete case analysis and imputation. A recent study showed that the estimated mean AUC difference between treatment groups based on the linear mixed model (LMM), rather than on individually calculated AUCs by simple imputation, has negligible bias under random missing assumptions and only small bias when missing is not at random. However, this model assumes the outcome to be normally distributed, which is often violated in biomarker data. In this paper, we propose to use a LMM on log-transformed biomarkers, based on which statistical inference for the ratio, rather than difference, of AUC between treatment groups is provided. The proposed method can not only handle the potential baseline imbalance in a randomized trail but also circumvent the estimation of the nuisance variance parameters in the log-normal model. The proposed model is applied to a recently completed large randomized trial studying the effect of nicotine reduction on biomarker exposure of smokers.
© 2021 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  area under the curve; biomarker; longitudinal; missing data; mixed effects model

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34151513      PMCID: PMC8604790          DOI: 10.1002/pst.2146

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharm Stat        ISSN: 1539-1604            Impact factor:   1.894


  17 in total

1.  Two formulas for computation of the area under the curve represent measures of total hormone concentration versus time-dependent change.

Authors:  Jens C Pruessner; Clemens Kirschbaum; Gunther Meinlschmid; Dirk H Hellhammer
Journal:  Psychoneuroendocrinology       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 4.905

2.  Shared parameter models for the joint analysis of longitudinal data and event times.

Authors:  Edward F Vonesh; Tom Greene; Mark D Schluchter
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2006-01-15       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  The case for the WHO Advisory Note, Global Nicotine Reduction Strategy.

Authors:  Dorothy K Hatsukami; Ghazi Zaatari; Eric Donny
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2016-06-29       Impact factor: 7.552

4.  Biomarkers of Exposure among Adult Smokeless Tobacco Users in the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health Study (Wave 1, 2013-2014).

Authors:  Yu-Ching Cheng; Carolyn M Reyes-Guzman; Carol H Christensen; Brian L Rostron; Kathryn C Edwards; Lanqing Wang; Jun Feng; Jeffery M Jarrett; Cynthia D Ward; Baoyun Xia; Heather L Kimmel; Kevin Conway; Carmine Leggett; Kristie Taylor; Charlie Lawrence; Ray Niaura; Mark J Travers; Andrew Hyland; Stephen S Hecht; Dorothy K Hatsukami; Maciej L Goniewicz; Nicolette Borek; Benjamin C Blount; Dana M van Bemmel
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2020-01-27       Impact factor: 4.254

5.  A comparison of the random-effects pattern mixture model with last-observation-carried-forward (LOCF) analysis in longitudinal clinical trials with dropouts.

Authors:  O Siddiqui; M W Ali
Journal:  J Biopharm Stat       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 1.051

6.  A new linear model-based approach for inferences about the mean area under the curve.

Authors:  Gregory E Wilding; Rameela Chandrasekhar; Alan D Hutson
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2012-12-10       Impact factor: 2.373

7.  Improved vancomycin dosing in children using area under the curve exposure.

Authors:  Jennifer Le; John S Bradley; William Murray; Gale L Romanowski; Tu T Tran; Natalie Nguyen; Susan Cho; Stephanie Natale; Ivilynn Bui; Tri M Tran; Edmund V Capparelli
Journal:  Pediatr Infect Dis J       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 2.129

8.  Reduced nicotine content cigarettes: effects on toxicant exposure, dependence and cessation.

Authors:  Dorothy K Hatsukami; Michael Kotlyar; Louise A Hertsgaard; Yan Zhang; Steven G Carmella; Joni A Jensen; Sharon S Allen; Peter G Shields; Sharon E Murphy; Irina Stepanov; Stephen S Hecht
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 6.526

9.  Regression models for log-normal data: comparing different methods for quantifying the association between abdominal adiposity and biomarkers of inflammation and insulin resistance.

Authors:  Sara Gustavsson; Björn Fagerberg; Gerd Sallsten; Eva M Andersson
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2014-03-27       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 10.  Reducing the nicotine content to make cigarettes less addictive.

Authors:  Neal L Benowitz; Jack E Henningfield
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 7.552

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.