| Literature DB >> 34151171 |
Shana Priscila Coutinho Barroso1,2,3, Ana Clara Vicente Dos Santos1,2, Patrícia Souza Dos Santos1,2,4, José Nelson Dos Santos Silva Couceiro5, Davis Fernandes Ferreira5, Dirlei Nico5, Alexandre Morrot6,7, Jerson Lima Silva1,2, Andrea Cheble de Oliveira1,2.
Abstract
Vaccines are a recommended strategy for controlling influenza A infections in humans and animals. Here, we describe the effects of hydrostatic pressure on the structure, morphology and functional characteristics of avian influenza A H3N8 virus. The effect of hydrostatic pressure for 3 h on H3N8 virus revealed that the particles were resistant to this condition, and the virus displayed only a discrete conformational change. We found that pressure of 3 kbar applied for 6 h was able to inhibit haemagglutination and infectivity while virus replication was no longer observed, suggesting that full virus inactivation occurred at this point. However, the neuraminidase activity was not affected at this approach suggesting the maintenance of neutralizing antibody epitopes in this key antigen. Our data bring important information for the area of structural virology of enveloped particles and support the idea of applying pressure-induced inactivation as a tool for vaccine production.Entities:
Keywords: fluorescence spectroscopy; high pressure; influenza virus; stability; viral inactivation
Year: 2021 PMID: 34151171 PMCID: PMC8208760 DOI: 10.1099/acmi.0.000220
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Access Microbiol ISSN: 2516-8290
Fig. 1.Effect of high hydrostatic pressure treatment on conformation of influenza A H3N8 viruses. The shift in the centre of spectral mass (●) and changes in light scattering (○) were evaluated throughout gradual increases of pressure (a) and as a function of 2.9 kbar applied for 3 h (b). Fluorescence data points in both graphs include the average and standard deviation results of three experiments and light-scattering curves are representative of three measurements. Points represent the mean of three independent experiments and the bars the standard error.
Fig. 2.Effect of high hydrostatic pressure treatment on bis-ANS binding to influenza A H3N8 viruses. The viruses were pre-incubated for 10 min with 15 mM bis-ANS probe. (a) The virus was submitted to a gradual pressure increase until it reached 2.9 kbar. The incubation time at each pressure point was 10 min. (b) The viruses were submitted to 3.0 kbar and the probe intensity checked every 10 min until it reached 180 min. Points represent the mean of three independent experiments and the bars the standard error. Inset: fluorescence emission spectra of influenza viruses: Under pressure (red line) and native particles (blue line). Black line is bis-ANS probe free in solution.
Fig. 3.Effect of high hydrostatic pressure treatment on the morphology of influenza A H3N8 viruses. Purified preparation of viruses (400 µg ml−1) pressurized for 6 h/2.9 kbar at 25 °C was morphologically analysed by electron microscopy. (a–c) Control samples and (d–f) pressurized samples. The arrow indicates the formation of a ‘pore’ on the viral envelope. The selected micrographs are representative of all grids analysed. Bars: 300 nm.
Fig. 4.Effect of high hydrostatic pressure treatment on HA and NA biological activities of influenza A H3N8 viruses. (a) Haemagglutinating litres of pressurized viruses at pH 7.4 for 3, 6, 12, 18 h at 3.1 kbar. Haemagglutination units (HAU) were determined by the reciprocal of the highest dilution where total haemagglutination was observed. (b) Inhibition of neuraminidase activity of pressurized virus at pH 7.4 for 3, 6, 12, 18 h at 3.1 kbar was determined by fluorimetric assay using MU-NANA as substrate. The NA activity of the pressurized virus was calculated by normalizing NA activity to the level of the native virus. ND, Not detected.
Fig. 5.Effect of high hydrostatic pressure treatment on the infectivity of influenza A H3N8 viruses. In this assay, purified influenza virus preparation at a concentration of 100 µg ml−1 was pressurized during 3, 6, 12 and 18 h at 2.9 kbar at 25 °C and titred for its infectivity (TCID50) in MDCK cells. ND, not detected by the method used.
Fig. 6.Analysis of potential residual infectivity of influenza A H3N8 viruses. Influenza virus preparation submitted at pressure-induced inactivation process was analysed by three serial passages (P1, P2 and P3) in embryonated chicken eggs. The samples were pressurized for 12 h/2.9 kbar (a) and 18 h/2.9kbar (b) at 25 °C and then analysed by haemagglutination assay. UHA, hemagglutinating units; ND, not detected.