Literature DB >> 34150175

A comparison of modified laparoscopic uterine suspension and vaginal hysterectomy with sacrospinous ligament fixation for treating pelvic organ prolapse.

Hongxia Zhu1,2, Yixuan Sun1,2, Xuan Zheng1,2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy and adverse events between modified laparoscopic uterine suspension and vaginal hysterectomy and sacrospinous ligament fixation.
METHODS: The study reviewed the clinical data of 50 postmenopausal patients who underwent modified laparoscopic uterine suspension (the hysteropexy group) and 50 patients who underwent vaginal hysterectomy with sacrospinous ligament fixation (the hysterectomy group) conducted by the same group of surgeons (2018.1-2019.6) retrospectively. We compared the two groups' baseline characteristics, perioperative details, complications, and POP-Q values before the operations and at 12 months after the operations. The effects on quality of life according to valid questionnaires (PFIQ-7 and PFDI-20) were compared. The patients were followed up for 12 months.
RESULTS: There were no significant differences in the perioperative details or baseline characteristics, except that more cases of concurrent vaginal wall (anterior and posterior) and concurrent perineal repair were observed in the hysteropexy group than in the hysterectomy group (9 versus 0, P=0.02; 33 versus 6, P < 0.001). The anatomical measures of points Ba, Bp, and C (P < 0.001), and the quality of life measures (P < 0.001 for PFIQ-7 and PFDI-20) after the operations exhibited significant improvements in the two groups. The total vaginal lengths (TVL) were dramatically decreased after the surgery in the hysterectomy group, but no differences were observed in the hysteropexy group. The two groups didn't show a significant difference in the recurrence of prolapse anatomically or symptomatically, but a dramatically higher number of patients in the hysterectomy group were found to have experienced postoperative vaginal bleeding, excessive granulation tissue and right buttock pain.
CONCLUSIONS: The postoperative outcomes, anatomical results, and improvement of function and symptoms of modified laparoscopic uterine suspension were similar to those of vaginal hysterectomy with sacrospinous ligament fixation. Moreover, modified laparoscopic uterine suspension had fewer postoperative complications, so it could be used as an additional choice for POP, although the long-term outcomes haven't been determined yet. AJTR
Copyright © 2021.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Modified laparoscopic uterine suspension; non-absorbable sutures; pelvic organ prolapse; sacrospinous ligament fixation; transvaginal hysterectomy

Year:  2021        PMID: 34150175      PMCID: PMC8205734     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Transl Res        ISSN: 1943-8141            Impact factor:   4.060


  18 in total

1.  The indication for hysterectomy as a risk factor for subsequent pelvic organ prolapse repair.

Authors:  Rune Lykke; Jan Blaakær; Bent Ottesen; Helga Gimbel
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2015-06-07       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  Transvaginal sacrospinous ligament fixation for posthysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse repair.

Authors:  Rodolfo Milani; Matteo Frigerio; Stefano Manodoro
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2017-01-09       Impact factor: 2.894

3.  Guidelines for privileging and credentialing physicians for sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors: 
Journal:  Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg       Date:  2013 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.091

4.  Uterine preservation vs hysterectomy in pelvic organ prolapse surgery: a systematic review with meta-analysis and clinical practice guidelines.

Authors:  Kate V Meriwether; Danielle D Antosh; Cedric K Olivera; Shunaha Kim-Fine; Ethan M Balk; Miles Murphy; Cara L Grimes; Ambereen Sleemi; Ruchira Singh; Alexis A Dieter; Catrina C Crisp; David D Rahn
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2018-01-17       Impact factor: 8.661

5.  Long-term outcome of native tissue reconstructive vaginal surgery for advanced pelvic organ prolapse at 86 months: Hysterectomy versus hysteropexy.

Authors:  Tsia-Shu Lo; Leng Boi Pue; Tai-Ho Hung; Pei-Ying Wu; Yiap Loong Tan
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Res       Date:  2015-03-21       Impact factor: 1.730

6.  Short forms of two condition-specific quality-of-life questionnaires for women with pelvic floor disorders (PFDI-20 and PFIQ-7).

Authors:  M D Barber; M D Walters; R C Bump
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 8.661

7.  Late suture site complications of sacrospinous ligament fixation.

Authors:  Mostafa A Hamdy; Waleed A Sayed Ahmed; Omima T Taha; Zakia M Abolill; Amal M Elshahat; Ahmed A Aboelroose
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol       Date:  2019-09-19       Impact factor: 2.435

Review 8.  Epidemiology and outcome assessment of pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors:  Matthew D Barber; Christopher Maher
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 2.894

9.  Effect of Vaginal Mesh Hysteropexy vs Vaginal Hysterectomy With Uterosacral Ligament Suspension on Treatment Failure in Women With Uterovaginal Prolapse: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Charles W Nager; Anthony G Visco; Holly E Richter; Charles R Rardin; Rebecca G Rogers; Heidi S Harvie; Halina M Zyczynski; Marie Fidela R Paraiso; Donna Mazloomdoost; Scott Grey; Amaanti Sridhar; Dennis Wallace
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2019-09-17       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 10.  Hysteropexy: an Option for the Repair of Pelvic Organ Prolapse.

Authors:  Sarah Bradley; Robert E Gutman; Lee A Richter
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2018-02-23       Impact factor: 3.092

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.