Literature DB >> 25808989

Long-term outcome of native tissue reconstructive vaginal surgery for advanced pelvic organ prolapse at 86 months: Hysterectomy versus hysteropexy.

Tsia-Shu Lo1,2,3, Leng Boi Pue4,5, Tai-Ho Hung1,3, Pei-Ying Wu1,4, Yiap Loong Tan4,6.   

Abstract

AIM: To evaluate and compare the long-term outcome of sacrospinous ligament fixation (SSF) in combination with various other compartment defect native tissue repairs with hysterectomy or hysteropexy.
METHODS: Medical records of 159 patients who underwent surgery for pelvic organ prolapse (POP) between April 2004 and August 2008 were reviewed retrospectively. Patients were assessed at baseline and at 5-year postoperative follow-up. SSF, anterior (AC) and posterior colporrhaphy (PC), both with and without hysterectomy, were performed. Primary outcome was objective cure (POP quantification system [POP-Q] ≤1) and subjective cure (negative response to questions 2 and 3 on Pelvic Organ Prolapse Distress Inventory 6 [POPDI-6]). Subanalysis was done on patients who had uterus preserved compared with those with vaginal hysterectomy.
RESULTS: Postoperative data were available for 146 patients: 120 in the hysterectomy group and 26 in the hysteropexy group. Mean age, parity, postmenopausal status and mean operating time in the hysterectomy group were significantly higher than in the hysteropexy group. At median follow-up of 86 months, objective cure at overall compartments for all patients was 67.8%, and for subjective cure, this was 64.4%. There was no difference in the adjusted odds ratio for objective and subjective cure rates in both groups, but the hysterectomy group had a significantly lower mean total POPDI-6 score.
CONCLUSION: SSF plus AC and PC have a low reoperation rate despite a moderate success rate at 7-year follow-up. There was no difference in the adjusted objective, subjective success rates and sexual function between sacrospinous hysteropexy and hysterectomy. The hysterectomy group, however, had fewer bothersome prolapse symptoms.
© 2015 The Authors. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research © 2015 Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  colporraphy; hysteropexy; long-term outcome; sacrospinous ligament fixation; vaginal hysterectomy

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25808989     DOI: 10.1111/jog.12678

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Res        ISSN: 1341-8076            Impact factor:   1.730


  9 in total

1.  Uterine-preserving surgeries for the repair of pelvic organ prolapse: a systematic review with meta-analysis and clinical practice guidelines.

Authors:  Kate V Meriwether; Ethan M Balk; Danielle D Antosh; Cedric K Olivera; Shunaha Kim-Fine; Miles Murphy; Cara L Grimes; Ambereen Sleemi; Ruchira Singh; Alexis A Dieter; Catrina C Crisp; David D Rahn
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2019-02-11       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  Comparative analysis of overall cost and rate of healthcare utilization among apical prolapse procedures.

Authors:  Lannah L Lua; Erika D Vicente; Prathamesh Pathak; Daniel Lybbert; Vani Dandolu
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2017-03-31       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 3.  Sacrospinous hysteropexy: review and meta-analysis of outcomes.

Authors:  Shveta Kapoor; Kanapathippillai Sivanesan; Jessica Amy Robertson; Mayooran Veerasingham; Vishal Kapoor
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2017-03-03       Impact factor: 2.894

4.  A comparison of modified laparoscopic uterine suspension and vaginal hysterectomy with sacrospinous ligament fixation for treating pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors:  Hongxia Zhu; Yixuan Sun; Xuan Zheng
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2021-05-15       Impact factor: 4.060

5.  Laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy for uterovaginal prolapse using validated questionnaires: 2-year prospective study.

Authors:  Farah Lone; Tamara Curnow; Sarah Anne Thomas
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2017-07-07       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 6.  Role of Hysteropexy in the Management of Pelvic Organ Prolapse.

Authors:  Zoe S Gan; Daniel S Roberson; Ariana L Smith
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2022-07-05       Impact factor: 2.862

7.  Sacrospinous ligament fixation for hysteropexy: does concomitant anterior and posterior fixation improve surgical outcome?

Authors:  Tsia-Shu Lo; Ma Clarissa Uy-Patrimonio; Wu-Chiao Hsieh; Ju-Chun Yang; Shih Yin Huang; Sandy Chua
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2017-10-02       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 8.  Tissue-engineered repair material for pelvic floor dysfunction.

Authors:  Meina Lin; Yongping Lu; Jing Chen
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-09-06

9.  Bilateral Sacrospinous Hysteropexy Versus Bilateral Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation with Vaginal Hysterectomy for Apical Uterovaginal Prolapse.

Authors:  Kaiyue Wang; Lijuan Shi; Zheren Huang; Yun Xu
Journal:  Int Neurourol J       Date:  2022-09-30       Impact factor: 3.038

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.