| Literature DB >> 34148470 |
Daniel A S Kitagawa1,2, Rafael B Rodrigues2, Thiago N Silva3, Wellington V Dos Santos4,5, Vinicius C V da Rocha6, Joyce S F D de Almeida1, Leandro B Bernardo2, Taynara Carvalho-Silva2, Cintia N Ferreira2, Angelo A T da Silva6, Alessandro B C Simas7, Eugenie Nepovimova8, Kamil Kuča8, Tanos C C França1,8, Samir F de A Cavalcante2,3,7,8.
Abstract
Organophosphorus poisoning caused by some pesticides and nerve agents is a life-threating condition that must be swiftly addressed to avoid casualties. Despite the availability of medical countermeasures, the clinically available compounds lack a broad spectrum, are not effective towards all organophosphorus toxins, and have poor pharmacokinetics properties to allow them crossing the blood-brain barrier, hampering cholinesterase reactivation at the central nervous system. In this work, we designed and synthesised novel isatin derivatives, linked to a pyridinium 4-oxime moiety by an alkyl chain with improved calculated properties, and tested their reactivation potency against paraoxon- and NEMP-inhibited acetylcholinesterase in comparison to the standard antidote pralidoxime. Our results showed that these compounds displayed comparable in vitro reactivation also pointed by the in silico studies, suggesting that they are promising compounds to tackle organophosphorus poisoning.Entities:
Keywords: Isatin; antidotes; cholinesterase reactivators; nerve agents; organophosphorus poisoning; pyridine oximes
Year: 2021 PMID: 34148470 PMCID: PMC8219220 DOI: 10.1080/14756366.2021.1916009
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Enzyme Inhib Med Chem ISSN: 1475-6366 Impact factor: 5.051
Scheme 1.Breakdown of ACh catalysed by AChE.
Figure 1.Examples of OP irreversible AChE inhibitors.
Figure 2.Some current antidotes towards OP poisoning (X− is chloride, bromide or mesylate).
Figure 3.Schematic interactions between the designed compounds and selected AChE sites.
Calculated druglikeness of the designed compounds.
| Compound | Linker | (X−)a | p | logP | DSb |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| –(CH2)3– | Br− | 8.1 | −1.99 | 0.76 | |
| –(CH2)4– | Cl− | 9.0 | −1.54 | 0.65 | |
| –(CH2)5– | Br− | 9.0 | −1.09 | 0.48 | |
| –(CH2)6– | Cl− | 9.0 | −0.63 | 0.42 | |
| –(CH2)2–O–(CH2)2– | Cl− | 8.7 | −2.54 | 0.61 | |
| 2-PAM ( | – | I- | 7.6 | −3.26 | 0.60 |
aSalts used in experimental assay.
bDrug score.
In silico data obtained using PXN as HssAChE inhibitor.
| Compound | Distance P–O (Å) | H-bonding residues | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| −133.2 | −6.2 | 5.4 | Tyr124 (2x), Phe295, Tyr337 | |
| −110.9 | −7.5 | 3.5 | Tyr124, Phe295, Ser298 (2x) | |
| −128.0 | −1.8 | 3.5 | Tyr124 (2x), Phe295 | |
| −134.1 | −6.0 | 4.3 | Tyr124 (2x), Phe295 | |
| −133.8 | −8.6 | 3.7 | Tyr124, Phe295, Ser298 (2x) | |
| 2−PAM ( | −84.3 | −2.5 | 7.5 | Tyr124 |
aIntermolecular interaction energy between ligand and protein.
bTotal hydrogen bonding energy.
In silico data obtained using VX/NEMP as HssAChE inbibitor.
| Compound | Distance P–O (Å) | H-bonding residues | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| −138.0 | −4.5 | 5.7 | Tyr124, Tyr337 (2x) | |
| −145.2 | −3.2 | 5.2 | Tyr337, Trp286 | |
| −139.4 | −4.8 | 5.7 | Tyr124, Tyr337 | |
| −135.0 | −3.5 | 6.0 | Tyr337 (2x) | |
| −132.6 | −8.3 | 6.5 | Tyr124 (2x), Tyr337 | |
| 2-PAM ( | −71.2 | −4.3 | 6.3 | Tyr124, Tyr337 |
aIntermolecular interaction energy between ligand and protein.
bTotal hydrogen bonding energy using VX/NEMP as HssAChE inhibitor.
Scheme 2.Retrosynthetic analysis for the desired compounds. Linker as defined by Table 1.
Summary of synthesis results.
| Linker | 15a–e | 14a–e | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reaction time (h) | Yield (%) | X− | Yield (%) | |
| –(CH2)3– | 3 | 70 | Br | 87 |
| –(CH2)4– | 5 | 81 | Cl | 62 |
| –(CH2)5– | 3 | 83 | Br | 87 |
| –(CH2)6– | 5 | 73 | Cl | 22 |
| –(CH2)2–O–(CH2)2– | 3 | 77 | Cl | 25 |
In vitro reactivation resultsa.
| PXN (10 μM)b | NEMP (1 μM)b | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Compound | 1 μM | 10 μM | 100 μM | 1 μM | 10 μM | 100 μM |
| 3 (± 0) | 11 (± 0) | 15 (± 1) | 0 (± 0) | 3 (± 1) | 3 (± 1) | |
| 8 (± 2) | 37 (± 4) | 42 (± 2) | 1 (± 1) | 2 (± 1) | 8 (± 1) | |
| 15 (± 1) | 59 (± 6) | 60 (± 3) | 1 (± 0) | 6 (± 1) | 21 (± 1) | |
| 14 (± 1) | 48 (± 5) | 32 (± 3) | 0 (± 0) | 4 (± 0) | 6 (± 0) | |
| 1 (± 0) | 14 (± 1) | 46 (± 4) | 0 (± 0) | 5 (± 1) | 20 (± 0) | |
| 2-PAM ( | 33 (± 3) | 31 (± 5) | 73 (± 5) | 0 (± 0) | 7 (± 0) | 21 (± 0) |
aResults expressed in percentage of reactivation (mean ± standard deviation).
bFinal concentration in each well. EeAChE was used as enzyme model and incubated for 30 min with tested inhibitors.