| Literature DB >> 34144983 |
Constanze Kuhlisch1, Guy Schleyer1, Nir Shahaf1, Flora Vincent1, Daniella Schatz1, Assaf Vardi2.
Abstract
Entities:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34144983 PMCID: PMC8213229 DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.abf4680
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Adv ISSN: 2375-2548 Impact factor: 14.136
Fig. 1Exometabolomics workflow applied on induced algal blooms in mesocosm setups.
(A) Location of the Marine Biological Station Espegrend, Norway (60°16′11N; 5°13′07E). Scale bar, 10 km. Map data: Google Earth, Landsat/Copernicus. (B) Experimental setup, consisting of four transparent enclosure bags mounted on floating frames and moored to a raft situated in Raunefjord. The bags were filled with surrounding fjord water at day −1 of the experiment and were supplemented with nutrients throughout the experiment. (C) Workflow for untargeted exometabolite profiling. (1) Sampling: Water samples were collected daily from each bag and the surrounding fjord using a peristaltic pump and a 200-μm prefilter. (2) Extraction: The water samples were filtered through three subsequent filters. Per sample, 1 liter of filtrate was collected and spiked with labeled internal standards for extraction. The filtrates were then acidified, and dissolved metabolites were extracted using SPE cartridges. Methanol eluates were kept at −80°C until further processing. (3) Acquisition and analysis: Eluates were dried and redissolved for untargeted metabolite profiling. Following data preprocessing, the dataset was used for comparative statistical analysis and peak annotation. S/S, stainless steel; PVDF, polyvinylidene difluoride; IS, internal standards. Photo credit: Assaf Vardi, Weizmann Institute of Science. Workflow created with BioRender.com.
Fig. 2Phytoplankton bloom succession is a major driver of marine DOM composition.
(A) Induced phytoplankton growth and succession in four mesocosm bags (filled symbols) compared to the surrounding fjord (plus symbols) following nutrient amendments. (B) Chlorophyll levels and growth of the calcifying alga E. huxleyi revealed three distinct phases: An initial bloom formed by a mixed algal community, the bloom of E. huxleyi, and its demise (separated by dashed lines). Chlorophyll levels (A) and calcified cell abundance (B) are based on flow cytometry analysis. For both, the average (solid line) and standard error (gray shading) of all bags are indicated (n = 4). (C) Principal components analysis (PCA) separated the exometabolite profiles of fjord (plus symbols) from mesocosm bag samples (filled symbols), with PC axis 1 reflecting bloom succession through time, revealing its impact on DOM composition. Exometabolite profiles were generated using an untargeted metabolomics approach resulting in 6786 mass features. Experimental days are indicated by symbol color, from yellow (day 1) to blue (day 23).
Fig. 3Dynamic changes in the exometabolic landscape during algal bloom succession.
(A) Hierarchical cluster analysis and heatmap of exometabolites that increased following the induction of phytoplankton blooms in the mesocosm bags compared to the fjord (1747 mass features). Samples (columns) are ordered by time (days) along bloom succession, each day showing all four bags (bags 1 to 4). Mass features (rows) are hierarchically clustered based on their log-transformed and standardized intensity profiles. Algal bloom phases are indicated on top. Six clusters with notable temporal profiles are highlighted in gray (clusters I to VI). (B) Temporal profiles of six selected clusters reveal diverse patterns driven by biological processes. Intensity profiles of putative metabolites following feature grouping (gray lines) are shown together with the average profile for each cluster (blue lines). Algal bloom phases are separated by dashed lines.
Fig. 4Lytic viral infection of E. huxleyi blooms leaves a distinct metabolic imprint on the marine DOM pool.
(A) Variable host-virus dynamics across the mesocosm bags based on the abundance of E. huxleyi cells (green) and extracellular EhV (black). Abundance of calcified E. huxleyi is based on flow cytometry analysis and abundance of extracellular EhV is based on the quantification of the EhV mcp gene. Bags are ordered by increasing EhV abundance. All E. huxleyi blooms peaked at day 17, with the highest cell abundance reached in bag 3 and the lowest in bag 4. The onset of bloom demise is indicated by a dashed line. mcp copy values are presented as average ± SD (n = 3). (B) Heatmap of 20 exometabolites that showed an intensity increase in response to viral infection. For each metabolite, the intensity of the most abundant mass feature ([M + H]+ or [M + H - H2O]+) is shown after log-transformation and standardization. Metabolites are ordered by retention time (Table 1).
Exometabolites that constitute the vDOM of E. huxleyi blooms.
RT, retention time; Pred., predicted; DBE, double bond equivalent. For detailed mass spectral information of all MS and MS/MS analyses, refer to data S2. Metabolites were identified to “Level 4–Unknown compounds” according to the Metabolomics Standards Initiative ().
| 1 | Chloro (Cl) | 11.13 | 364.9544 | |||||||
| 2 | None | 11.42 | 211.0965 | [M + H]+ | C11H14O4 | 210.0865 | 5 | 211.0965 | 0.0 | |
| 3 | Trichloro-iodo (Cl3 I) | 13.75 | 639.0027 | [M + H]+ | C18H30Cl3IO10 | 637.9949 | 2 | 639.0022 | 0.8 | +O |
| 4 | Dichloro-iodo (Cl2 I) | 15.15‡ | 629.0405 | [M + H - H2O]+ | C20H33Cl2IO11 | 646.0445 | 3 | 629.0412 | −1.1 | +C2H2O2 |
| 5 | Dichloro-iodo (Cl2 I) | 15.15‡ | 589.0464 | [M + H]+ | C18H31Cl2IO9 | 588.0386 | 2 | 589.0463 | 0.2 | Reference |
| 6 | Dichloro-iodo (Cl2 I) | 15.55 | 629.0402 | [M + H - H2O]+ | C20H33Cl2IO11 | 646.0445 | 3 | 629.0412 | −1.6 | +C2H2O2 |
| 7 | Trichloro-iodo (Cl3 I) | 16.90 | 623.0067 | [M + H]+ | C18H30Cl3IO9 | 621.9989 | 2 | 623.0073 | −1.0 | |
| 8 | Dichloro-iodo (Cl2 I) | 17.13 | 603.0619 | [M + H]+ | C19H33Cl2IO9 | 602.0541 | 2 | 603.0619 | 0.0 | +CH2 |
| 9 | Iodo (I) | 17.23 | 618.1921 | [M + H]+ | C27H40IO7N | 617.1843 | 8 | 618.1922 | −0.2 | |
| 10 | Dichloro-iodo (Cl2 I) | 17.25 | 629.0409 | [M + H - H2O]+ | C20H33Cl2IO11 | 646.0445 | 3 | 629.0412 | −0.5 | +C2H2O2 |
| 11 | None | 17.70 | 193.0859 | [M + H]+ | C11H12O3 | 192.0786 | 6 | 193.0859 | 0.0 | |
| 12 | Trichloro (Cl3) | 21.00 | 366.1149 | [M + H]+ | ||||||
| 13 | Iodo (I) | 24.05 | 600.1817 | [M + H]+ | C27H38IO6N | 599.1739 | 9 | 600.1817 | 0.0 | |
| 14 | Trichloro-iodo (Cl3 I) | 25.08 | 586.9858 | [M + H - H2O]+ | C18H28Cl3IO8 | 603.9886 | 3 | 586.9862 | −0.7 | -H2O |
| 15 | None | 25.27 | 363.4955 | |||||||
| 16 | Dichloro-iodo (Cl2 I) | 25.28 | 611.0307 | [M + H - H2O]+ | C20H31Cl2IO10 | 628.0335 | 4 | 611.0306 | 0.2 | +C2H2O2 -H2O |
| 17 | Trichloro (Cl3) | 29.95 | 861.2982 | |||||||
| 18 | Trichloro (Cl3) | 29.98 | 803.2923 | [M + H]+ | ||||||
| 19 | Bromo-chloro (Brx Cly) | 30.37 | 905.2472 | [M + H]+ | ||||||
| 20 | Bromo-chloro (Brx Cly) | 30.40 | 847.2414 |
*Chemical formulas were predicted based on isotope pattern and fragmentation tree analysis (see Materials and Methods).
†Spectral data indicated a shared core structure for all chloro-iodo metabolites, consisting solely of CHO. The differences between these nonhalogenated core structures were thus evaluated. First, a predicted nonhalogenated mass was calculated by replacing all halogen atoms with hydrogen atoms. Then, mass differences were calculated toward the most intense metabolite #5. For each mass difference, the molecular formula difference was predicted (<3 mDa).
‡The coeluting metabolites #4 and #5 were verified using additional chromatography and MS/MS analysis.
Fig. 5The vDOM produced during E. huxleyi bloom demise comprises unique chlorine-iodine–containing metabolites.
(A) Mass spectrum of m/z 589.0464 [M + H]+, the adduct ion of metabolite #5 in positive ionization mode, showing an isotope pattern typical for dichlorination. Relative abundance of the +2 and +4 isotopes at a ratio of 9:6:1 indicates the presence of two chlorine atoms for altogether six of nine vDOM metabolites. For metabolites #3, 7, and 14, a ratio of 10:10:3:1 indicates three chlorine atoms. (B) MS/MS spectrum of m/z 587.0295 [M - H]−, the adduct ion of metabolite #5 in negative ionization mode, revealed iodination by the intense iodide fragment with m/z 126.90 and a neutral loss of HI. Neutral losses of both HI and HCl are prominent and were also confirmed by MS/MS analysis in positive ionization mode (data S2). (C) Extracted ion chromatograms (EICs) of the iodide fragment in the bag with lowest (bag 3) and highest (bag 4) viral infection at the end of the E. huxleyi demise phase (day 23). Each peak indicates the presence of an iodine-containing metabolite, highlighting a general metabolic shift toward iodination due to viral infection. Peaks are numbered as in Table 1 and data S2. (D) Peak area profiles reveal the presence of the chloro-iodo metabolites in bags 3 and 4 throughout the bloom and the demise phase of E. huxleyi (separated by a dashed line). Peak areas were normalized and scaled to day 23 of bag 4. (E) Chloro-iodo metabolites in biomass samples from oceanic E. huxleyi blooms in the North Atlantic show higher abundances in late infection compared to postinfection bloom stages. Peak areas were normalized and scaled to cast 29 at 5 m depth. Metabolites #21 and 23 were detected but were below limit of quantification.