Peter D Hibbert1,2, Martin Basedow3, Jeffrey Braithwaite3, Louise K Wiles3,4, Robyn Clay-Williams3, Robert Padbury5,6. 1. Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, 75 Talavera Rd, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia. Peter.hibbert@mq.edu.au. 2. IIMPACT in Health, Allied Health and Human Performance, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia. Peter.hibbert@mq.edu.au. 3. Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, 75 Talavera Rd, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia. 4. IIMPACT in Health, Allied Health and Human Performance, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia. 5. Department of Surgery and Perioperative Medicine, Southern Adelaide Local Health Network, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia. 6. College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: A key characteristic of healthcare systems that deliver high quality and cost performance in a sustainable way is a systematic approach to capacity and capability building for quality improvement. The aim of this research was to explore the factors that lead to successful implementation of a program of quality improvement projects and a capacity and capability building program that facilitates or support these. METHODS: Between July 2018 and February 2020, the Southern Adelaide Local Health Network (SALHN), a network of health services in Adelaide, South Australia, conducted three capability-oriented capacity building programs that incorporated 82 longstanding individual quality improvement projects. Qualitative analysis of data collected from interviews of 19 project participants and four SALHN Improvement Faculty members and ethnographic observations of seven project team meetings were conducted. RESULTS: We found four interacting components that lead to successful implementation of quality improvement projects and the overall program that facilitates or support these: an agreed and robust quality improvement methodology, a skilled faculty to assist improvement teams, active involvement of leadership and management, and a deep understanding that teams matter. A strong safety culture is not necessarily a pre-requisite for quality improvement gains to be made; indeed, undertaking quality improvement activities can contribute to an improved safety culture. For most project participants in the program, the time commitment for projects was significant and, at times, maintaining momentum was a challenge. CONCLUSIONS: Healthcare systems that wish to deliver high quality and cost performance in a sustainable way should consider embedding the four identified components into their quality improvement capacity and capability building strategy.
BACKGROUND: A key characteristic of healthcare systems that deliver high quality and cost performance in a sustainable way is a systematic approach to capacity and capability building for quality improvement. The aim of this research was to explore the factors that lead to successful implementation of a program of quality improvement projects and a capacity and capability building program that facilitates or support these. METHODS: Between July 2018 and February 2020, the Southern Adelaide Local Health Network (SALHN), a network of health services in Adelaide, South Australia, conducted three capability-oriented capacity building programs that incorporated 82 longstanding individual quality improvement projects. Qualitative analysis of data collected from interviews of 19 project participants and four SALHN Improvement Faculty members and ethnographic observations of seven project team meetings were conducted. RESULTS: We found four interacting components that lead to successful implementation of quality improvement projects and the overall program that facilitates or support these: an agreed and robust quality improvement methodology, a skilled faculty to assist improvement teams, active involvement of leadership and management, and a deep understanding that teams matter. A strong safety culture is not necessarily a pre-requisite for quality improvement gains to be made; indeed, undertaking quality improvement activities can contribute to an improved safety culture. For most project participants in the program, the time commitment for projects was significant and, at times, maintaining momentum was a challenge. CONCLUSIONS: Healthcare systems that wish to deliver high quality and cost performance in a sustainable way should consider embedding the four identified components into their quality improvement capacity and capability building strategy.
Entities:
Keywords:
Patient safety; Qualitative research; Quality improvement; Quality of health care
Authors: Amirta Benning; Maisoon Ghaleb; Anu Suokas; Mary Dixon-Woods; Jeremy Dawson; Nick Barber; Bryony Dean Franklin; Alan Girling; Karla Hemming; Martin Carmalt; Gavin Rudge; Thirumalai Naicker; Ugochi Nwulu; Sopna Choudhury; Richard Lilford Journal: BMJ Date: 2011-02-03
Authors: Dionne S Kringos; Rosa Sunol; Cordula Wagner; Russell Mannion; Philippe Michel; Niek S Klazinga; Oliver Groene Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2015-07-22 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Natalya Elizabeth O'Neill; Jillian Baker; Richard Ward; Colleen Johnson; Linda Taggart; Michelle Sholzberg Journal: BMJ Open Qual Date: 2020-08
Authors: Brigid Brown; Sophia Bermingham; Marthinus Vermeulen; Beth Jennings; Kirsty Adamek; Mark Markou; Jane E Bassham; Peter Hibbert Journal: BMJ Open Qual Date: 2021-11