| Literature DB >> 34143355 |
Rana A A M Al-Mohana1,2, Fenik Kaml Muhammed3, Xiaoguang Li4, Grace Paka Lubamba5.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate and compare sizes, shapes and bridging of the sella turcica (ST) in Yemeni individuals with different skeletal patterns, genders, and ages, and to assess the association between the linear dimension of ST and gender, age, or skeletal patterns. The standard anatomical structure of ST among Yemeni subjects is still unknown and this study can be considered as the first reference regarding ST of Yemeni individuals.Entities:
Keywords: Bridging; Morphology; Sella turcica; Size; Yemen
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34143355 PMCID: PMC8211719 DOI: 10.1007/s11282-021-00541-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oral Radiol ISSN: 0911-6028 Impact factor: 1.852
Distribution of sample according to gender, age, and skeletal class
| Females | Males | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8–14 years | 15–36 years | 8–14 years | 15–36 years | Total | |
| Skeletal patterns | |||||
| Class I | 10 | 45 | 4 | 23 | 82 |
| Class II | 12 | 82 | 15 | 13 | 122 |
| Class III | 5 | 13 | 3 | 9 | 30 |
| Total | 27 | 140 | 22 | 45 | 234 |
Fig. 1Normal ST morphology and reference lines used for measuring sellae size: TS, tuberculum sellae; DS, dorsum sellae; BPF, base of the pituitary fossa; black line, length of sellae; dashed line, Antero-posterior diameter of sellae; dotted line, depth of sellae
Means and standard deviations of ST dimensions according to (age, gender, and skeletal patterns)
| Length of ST | Depth of ST | A.P diameter of ST | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age | Gender | Patterns | Mean | SD | Age | Gender | Patterns | Mean | SD | Age | Gender | Patterns | Mean | SD |
| Pre-puberty | Females | Class I | 7.18 | 2.01 | Pre-puberty | Females | Class I | 8.23 | 1.39 | Pre-puberty | Females | Class I | 10.54 | 2.15 |
| Class II | 7.23 | 1.17 | Class II | 8.24 | 1.22 | Class II | 10.47 | 0.81 | ||||||
| Class III | 7.41 | 1.99 | Class III | 8.52 | 0.94 | Class III | 10.72 | 1.06 | ||||||
| Males | Class I | 9.25 | 2.64 | Males | Class I | 8.04 | 0.86 | Males | Class I | 10.37 | 1.86 | |||
| Class II | 8.37 | 2.24 | Class II | 8.71 | 1.48 | Class II | 10.86 | 1.65 | ||||||
| Class III | 8.62 | 0.61 | Class III | 7.4 | 0.46 | Class III | 9.99 | 0.3 | ||||||
| Post-puberty | Females | Class I | 7.67 | 1.55 | Post-puberty | Females | Class I | 8.3 | 1.1 | Post-puberty | Females | Class I | 11.17 | 1.54 |
| Class II | 8.2 | 1.59 | Class II | 8.76 | 1.25 | Class II | 11.7 | 1.41 | ||||||
| Class III | 8.58 | 1.6 | Class III | 8.02 | 1.46 | Class III | 11.32 | 1.65 | ||||||
| Males | Class I | 8.24 | 1.69 | Males | Class I | 8.92 | 0.95 | Males | Class I | 11.84 | 1.66 | |||
| Class II | 7.55 | 1.48 | Class II | 9.25 | 1.64 | Class II | 12.34 | 1.91 | ||||||
| Class III | 8.38 | 1.6 | Class III | 8.09 | 1.34 | Class III | 11.03 | 1.86 | ||||||
Multivariate ANOVA (MANOVA) result for evaluation relation among age, gender, and skeletal classification on length, depth and A.P diameter of ST
| Source | Age | Gender | Skeletal classification | Age *gender | Age*classification | Gender*classification | Age*gender* classification | Error | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| By length of ST | |||||||||
| Type III sum of squares | 0.23 | 12.56 | 3.34 | 16.08 | 1.87 | 7.1 | 0.2 | 613.33 | 15,710.22 |
| | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 222 | 234 |
| Mean square | 0.23 | 12.56 | 1.67 | 16.08 | 0.93 | 3.55 | 0.1 | 2.76 | |
| | 0.08 | 4.54 | 0.6 | 5.82 | 0.34 | 1.28 | 0.04 | ||
| Sig | 0.77 | 0.034* | 0.54 | 0.017* | 0.71 | 0.27 | 0.96 | ||
| Eta | 0.020 | 0.026 | |||||||
| Observed power | 0.565 | 0.671 | |||||||
| By depth of ST | |||||||||
| Type III sum of squares | 3.54 | 0.08 | 9.78 | 2.96 | 0.82 | 4.16 | 1.86 | 345.07 | 17,544.68 |
| | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 222 | 234 |
| Mean square | 3.54 | 0.08 | 4.89 | 2.96 | 0.41 | 2.08 | 0.93 | 1.55 | |
| | 2.27 | 0.05 | 3.14 | 1.9 | 0.26 | 1.34 | 0.59 | ||
| Sig | 0.13 | 0.81 | 0.045* | 0.16 | 0.76 | 0.26 | 0.55 | ||
| Eta | .028 | ||||||||
| Observed power | 0.60 | ||||||||
| By A.P diameter of ST | |||||||||
| Type III sum of squares | 30.2 | 0.18 | 6.77 | 1.69 | 1.35 | 4.4 | 0.55 | 537.09 | 30,864.23 |
| | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 222 | 234 |
| Mean square | 30.2 | 0.18 | 3.38 | 1.69 | 0.67 | 2.2 | 0.27 | 2.41 | |
| | 12.48 | 0.07 | 1.39 | 0.7 | 0.28 | 0.91 | 0.11 | ||
| Sig | 0.000* | 0.78 | 0.24 | 0.4 | 0.75 | 0.4 | 0.89 | ||
| Eta | .053 | ||||||||
| Observed power | 0.94 | ||||||||
dF degrees of freedom, F F value, sig P value, Eta Partial Eta Squared
*P < 0.05
Fig.2a Normal morphology, b ST bridging, c double contour of the floor, d irregularity (notching) in the posterior wall of dorsum sellae, e pyramidal shape of dorsum sellae, f oblique anterior wall
Fig.3Shape of ST in different skeletal patterns
Comparison of linear measurements of ST between shapes of ST
| Shape of ST | Length of ST (mm) | Depth of ST (mm) | A.P diameter of ST (mm) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | SD | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | |
| Normal sella | 8.24 | 1.49 | 8.52 | 1.32 | 11.52 | 1.55 |
| Sella turcica bridge | 7.35 | 1.71 | 8.73 | 1.19 | 11.06 | 1.54 |
| Double contour of the floor | 8.31 | 1.50 | 8.35 | 1.09 | 11.67 | 1.8 |
| Irregular dorm sella | 9.29 | 1.47 | 8.10 | 1.05 | 11.33 | 1.12 |
| Pyramidal shape | 8.07 | 1.52 | 9.20 | 1.22 | 11.65 | 1.86 |
| Oblique anterior wall | 9.55 | 1.53 | 7.52 | 1.06 | 11.58 | 2.16 |
| 0.140 | 0.054 | 0.263 | ||||
Fig.4a Type 1 (no calcification), b Type 2 (partial calcification), c Type 3 (complete calcification)
Comparison of ST bridging between skeletal patterns
| Skeletal pattern | ST bridging | Total (%) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No calcification (%) | Partial calcification (%) | Complete calcification (%) | |||
| Class I | 53 (64.6) | 15 (18.3) | 14 (17.1) | 82 (100) | 0.397 |
| Class II | 72 (59) | 27 (22.1) | 23 (18.9) | 122 (100) | |
| Class III | 22 (73.3) | 2 (6.7) | 6 (20) | 30 (100) | |