Literature DB >> 34142493

[Digital study of the ideal position of lag screw internal fixation in the anterior column of the acetabulum].

Yazhi Bai1,2, Qiang Liu2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To find the ideal position of lag screw internal fixation in the anterior column of acetabulum by digital technology, and measure its related parameters, so as to improve the accuracy of lag screw implantation.
METHODS: The CT scan data of 266 semi-pelvic raw in 133 cases (78 males and 55 females, aged 18-65 years old with an average age of 42 years) were collected between January 2019 and January 2020 to compose three-dimensional models. According to the relationship between the peripheral bone cortex of the anatomical channel and the lag screw, a new standard for the ideal position of lag screw fixation in the anterior column of acetabulum was proposed to simulate the implantation of the screw. After the screw was in the ideal position, the following indicators were measured: the maximum allowable diameter of the virtual screw (the diameter of the cylinder up to the new standard, R), the length (the distance between the center of the nail point on both sides, L); the position of the retrograde nail point (the interval between the nail insertion points and the midpoint of the pubic symphysis and the pubic tubercle, respectively, D1 and D2) and the position of the antegrade nail insertion point (the distance between the nail insertion point and the anterior superior iliac spine, the major ischial notch, and the vertical distance between the nail insertion point and the apex of the posterior upper edge of the acetabulum, respectively, D3, D4, D5); and the direction of the virtual screw at the ideal position (the angle between the screw and the horizontal plane, sagittal plane, and coronal plane, respectively, ∠β, ∠γ, ∠δ) were calculated.
RESULTS: The maximum allowable diameter of virtual screws was 5.70-14.10 mm for males, with an average of 9.25 mm; for females, it was 4.40-10.40 mm with an average of 7.29 mm. The antegrade insertion point of the anteroposterior acetabular lag screw was located at 2.0-2.5 cm above the apex of the acetabulum, which was almost the same distance from the anterior superior iliac spine and the ischial notch, about 5 cm; the insertion point of the retrograde implant was located at the pubic bone 2.5-3.0 cm below the nodule. When the acetabular anterior column screw was in the ideal position, there was no significant difference in the comparison of ∠β and ∠γ between the male and the female ( P>0.05), and the differences in the other indicators were significant ( P<0.05). Except for D4 and ∠β showing no significant difference between the left and right sides ( P>0.05), the differences in the other indicators were significant ( P<0.05).
CONCLUSION: In the bony channel of the anterior column of the acetabulum, all males can accommodate screws with a diameter of <5.70 mm, and females can accommodate screws with a diameter of <4.40 mm. The anterograde or retrograde screw insertion points are different for male and female. The use of digital technology to individually measure the appropriate screw parameters can improve the accuracy and stability of the lag screw internal fixation for acetabular anterior column fractures.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anterior acetabular column; bony channel; digitization; ideal location; lag screw

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34142493      PMCID: PMC8218193          DOI: 10.7507/1002-1892.202102002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi        ISSN: 1002-1892


  13 in total

1.  Changes in the treatment of acetabular fractures over 15 years: Analysis of 1266 cases treated by the German Pelvic Multicentre Study Group (DAO/DGU).

Authors:  Björn Gunnar Ochs; Ivan Marintschev; Heike Hoyer; Bernd Rolauffs; Ulf Culemann; Tim Pohlemann; Fabian Maria Stuby
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2010-05-06       Impact factor: 2.586

2.  Differences of percutaneous retrograde screw fixation of anterior column acetabular fractures between male and female: a study of 164 virtual three-dimensional models.

Authors:  Kai Ning Chen; Gang Wang; Liang Guo Cao; Mei Chao Zhang
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2009-03-28       Impact factor: 2.586

3.  Anatomic basis of lag screw placement in the anterior column of the acetabulum.

Authors:  N A Ebraheim; R Xu; A Biyani; J A Benedetti
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  The obturator oblique and iliac oblique/outlet views predict most accurately the adequate position of an anterior column acetabular screw.

Authors:  João Antonio Matheus Guimarães; Murphy P Martin; Flávio Ribeiro da Silva; Maria Eugenia Leite Duarte; Amanda Dos Santos Cavalcanti; Jamila Alessandra Perini Machado; Cyril Mauffrey; David Rojas
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-06-08       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Comparison of anterograde versus retrograde percutaneous screw fixation of anterior column acetabular fractures.

Authors:  Ye Peng; Lihai Zhang; William Min; Peifu Tang
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2015-10-17       Impact factor: 2.924

Review 6.  Intramedullary Fixation Techniques for the Anterior Pelvic Ring.

Authors:  Jonathan G Eastman; Milton L Chip Routt
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 2.512

7.  Morphometric analysis of the anterior column of the acetabulum and safety of intramedullary screw fixation for its fractures in Indian population: a preliminary report.

Authors:  Vivek Trikha; Arvind Kumar; Samarth Mittal; Jigyasa Passey; Sahil Gaba; Atin Kumar
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2019-12-14       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Immediate full weightbearing after percutaneous fixation of anterior column acetabulum fractures.

Authors:  Namdar Kazemi; Michael T Archdeacon
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 2.512

9.  Early Operative Treatment of Acetabular Fractures Does Not Increase Blood Loss: A Retrospective Review.

Authors:  Joshua A Parry; Samanatha Nino; Nima Khosravani; Lee Weber; George J Haidukewych; Kenneth J Koval; Joshua R Langford
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 2.512

10.  Acetabular fracture: long-term follow-up and factors associated with secondary implantation of total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  B Dunet; C Tournier; A Billaud; N Lavoinne; T Fabre; A Durandeau
Journal:  Orthop Traumatol Surg Res       Date:  2013-04-04       Impact factor: 2.256

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.