Literature DB >> 20451195

Changes in the treatment of acetabular fractures over 15 years: Analysis of 1266 cases treated by the German Pelvic Multicentre Study Group (DAO/DGU).

Björn Gunnar Ochs1, Ivan Marintschev, Heike Hoyer, Bernd Rolauffs, Ulf Culemann, Tim Pohlemann, Fabian Maria Stuby.   

Abstract

Epidemiological, clinical and radiological data of 1266 patients with a unilateral acetabular fracture of up to 29 hospitals was reviewed. Three time periods, 1991-1993 (Registry I; n=359), 1998-2000 (Registry II; n=503), and 2005-2006 (Registry III; n=404) were compared with regard to injury pattern and severity, fracture type, and chosen nonoperative vs. operative treatment to elucidate changes over time in the treatment of acetabular fractures. In the operatively treated group, time to operation, surgical approach, fracture fixation implants and fracture reduction quality were examined. 641 (50.6%) patients with isolated acetabular fractures, 410 (32.4%) multiple injured and 215 (17.0%) polytrauma patients with 642 (50.7%) simple and 624 (49.3%) associated acetabular fractures were evaluated. In the time period from 1991 to 2006, the rate of operative treatments increased nationwide to 77% (rho<0.001). The distribution of fracture types involving the anterior and posterior wall changed with age (rho<0.001). Across all registries, 583 (68.0%) operations were performed within 7 days, 212 (24.7%) operations between 7 and 14 days and 54 (6.3%) operations were performed later than 14 days after injury. An anatomical reduction (0-1mm displacement) was achieved in 551 (64%) acetabular fractures. The obtained reduction quality did not correlate with time to operation, was lower in associated than in simple fracture types, and also lower in patients with isolated acetabular fractures than in polytrauma patients. Most importantly, the fracture reduction quality did not improve over time despite a higher frequency of surgical interventions. The Kocher-Langenbeck approach was preferred in the nineties in nearly three quarters of all operative procedures. Currently, the Kocher-Langenbeck and the ilioinguinal approaches are used equally often. The fracture fixation did not change over time and is achieved in 51% with plates in combination with single screws. This multisurgeon series illustrates a nationwide performance in acetabular fracture management. Despite changes in the chosen approaches and an increased surgical frequency, the operative treatment of acetabular fractures of the last 15 years did not lead to an increased reduction quality. Therefore, the rarity and complexity of acetabular fractures demands further specific teaching by experienced acetabular surgeons, scientific research and clinical outcome evaluation. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20451195     DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2010.04.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Injury        ISSN: 0020-1383            Impact factor:   2.586


  58 in total

1.  Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis on anterior pelvic ring injury and anterior column acetabular fracture.

Authors:  Hadisoebroto Dilogo Ismail; Yoshi Pratama Djaja; Jessica Fiolin
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2017-06-08

2.  Use of a stainless steel locking calcaneal plate for quadrilateral plate buttress in the treatment of acetabular fractures.

Authors:  Guilherme Boni; Robinson E Pires; Gustavo T Sanchez; Fernando B Dos Reis; Richard S Yoon; Frank A Liporace
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2019-03-08

3.  Comparison of anterograde versus retrograde percutaneous screw fixation of anterior column acetabular fractures.

Authors:  Ye Peng; Lihai Zhang; William Min; Peifu Tang
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2015-10-17       Impact factor: 2.924

4.  Sex-specific differences of the infraacetabular corridor: a biomorphometric CT-based analysis on a database of 523 pelves.

Authors:  Florian Gras; Heiko Gottschling; Manuel Schröder; Ivan Marintschev; Nils Reimers; Rainer Burgkart
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-09-27       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  What is the frequency of nerve injuries associated with acetabular fractures?

Authors:  Wolfgang Lehmann; Michael Hoffmann; Florian Fensky; Jakob Nüchtern; Lars Großterlinden; Emin Aghayev; Helmar Lehmann; Fabian Stuby; Johannes M Rueger
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  The epidemiology and injury patterns of acetabular fractures: are the USA and China comparable?

Authors:  Cyril Mauffrey; Jiandong Hao; Derly O Cuellar; Benoit Herbert; Xiao Chen; Bo Liu; Yingze Zhang; Wade Smith
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  [Acetabular fractures in the elderly. Outcome of open reduction and internal fixation].

Authors:  G Tosounidis; U Culemann; M Bauer; J H Holstein; P Garcia; R Kurowski; A Pizanis; E Aghayev; T Pohlemann
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 1.000

8.  [Surgical treatment of acetabulum fractures in the elderly. Osteosynthesis or endoprosthesis].

Authors:  C Fölsch; M M Alwani; V Jurow; R Stiletto
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 1.000

9.  [A novel two-incision minimally invasive method for the treatment of anterior acetabular fractures].

Authors:  S Ruchholtz; G Taeger; R Zettl
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 1.000

10.  [Posterior approaches to the acetabulum].

Authors:  K-A Siebenrock; M Tannast; J D Bastian; M J B Keel
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 1.000

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.