Ruiqi Geng1,2, Yuxin Zhang1,2, Jitka Starekova1, David R Rutkowski1,3, Lloyd Estkowski4, Alejandro Roldán-Alzate1,3, Diego Hernando1,2. 1. Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA. 2. Department of Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA. 3. Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA. 4. GE Healthcare, Waukesha, Wisconsin, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To assess the effects of cardiovascular-induced motion on conventional DWI of the pancreas and to evaluate motion-robust DWI methods in a motion phantom and healthy volunteers. METHODS: 3T DWI was acquired using standard monopolar and motion-compensated gradient waveforms, including in an anatomically accurate pancreas phantom with controllable compressive motion and healthy volunteers (n = 8, 10). In volunteers, highly controlled single-slice DWI using breath-holding and cardiac gating and whole-pancreas respiratory-triggered DWI were acquired. For each acquisition, the ADC variability across volunteers, as well as ADC differences across parts of the pancreas were evaluated. RESULTS: In motion phantom scans, conventional DWI led to biased ADC, whereas motion-compensated waveforms produced consistent ADC. In the breath-held, cardiac-triggered study, conventional DWI led to heterogeneous DW signals and highly variable ADC across the pancreas, whereas motion-compensated DWI avoided these artifacts. In the respiratory-triggered study, conventional DWI produced heterogeneous ADC across the pancreas (head: 1756 ± 173 × 10-6 mm2 /s; body: 1530 ± 338 × 10-6 mm2 /s; tail: 1388 ± 267 × 10-6 mm2 /s), with ADCs in the head significantly higher than in the tail (P < .05). Motion-compensated ADC had lower variability across volunteers (head: 1277 ± 102 × 10-6 mm2 /s; body: 1204 ± 169 × 10-6 mm2 /s; tail: 1235 ± 178 × 10-6 mm2 /s), with no significant difference (P ≥ .19) across the pancreas. CONCLUSION: Cardiovascular motion introduces artifacts and ADC bias in pancreas DWI, which are addressed by motion-robust DWI.
PURPOSE: To assess the effects of cardiovascular-induced motion on conventional DWI of the pancreas and to evaluate motion-robust DWI methods in a motion phantom and healthy volunteers. METHODS: 3T DWI was acquired using standard monopolar and motion-compensated gradient waveforms, including in an anatomically accurate pancreas phantom with controllable compressive motion and healthy volunteers (n = 8, 10). In volunteers, highly controlled single-slice DWI using breath-holding and cardiac gating and whole-pancreas respiratory-triggered DWI were acquired. For each acquisition, the ADC variability across volunteers, as well as ADC differences across parts of the pancreas were evaluated. RESULTS: In motion phantom scans, conventional DWI led to biased ADC, whereas motion-compensated waveforms produced consistent ADC. In the breath-held, cardiac-triggered study, conventional DWI led to heterogeneous DW signals and highly variable ADC across the pancreas, whereas motion-compensated DWI avoided these artifacts. In the respiratory-triggered study, conventional DWI produced heterogeneous ADC across the pancreas (head: 1756 ± 173 × 10-6 mm2 /s; body: 1530 ± 338 × 10-6 mm2 /s; tail: 1388 ± 267 × 10-6 mm2 /s), with ADCs in the head significantly higher than in the tail (P < .05). Motion-compensated ADC had lower variability across volunteers (head: 1277 ± 102 × 10-6 mm2 /s; body: 1204 ± 169 × 10-6 mm2 /s; tail: 1235 ± 178 × 10-6 mm2 /s), with no significant difference (P ≥ .19) across the pancreas. CONCLUSION: Cardiovascular motion introduces artifacts and ADC bias in pancreas DWI, which are addressed by motion-robust DWI.
Authors: Yi Wang; Zongming E Chen; Paul Nikolaidis; Robert J McCarthy; Laura Merrick; Laura A Sternick; Jeanne M Horowitz; Vahid Yaghmai; Frank H Miller Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2011-01 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Emine Ulku Saritas; Charles H Cunningham; Jin Hyung Lee; Eric T Han; Dwight G Nishimura Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2008-08 Impact factor: 4.668