Literature DB >> 34141030

Accuracy of training blood volume quantification using a visual estimation tool.

Janett Kreutziger1, Philip Puchner2, Stefan Schmid1, Wolfgang Mayer3, Harald Prossliner4, Wolfgang Lederer4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We investigated whether the use of a specially designed visual estimation tool may improve accuracy in quantifying blood volumes related to surface spreading.
METHODS: A prospective, paired-control, single-blinded experimental study was performed at a medical university. Anesthesiologists and emergency medical personnel estimated various blood volumes on surfaces with varying absorptivity (carpet, towel, polyvinyl chloride, wooden flooring) in an experimental setting. We assessed the sensitivity of training blood volume quantification using a self-designed visual estimation tool by comparing the accuracy of visual blood volume estimations before and after practical training with the tool.
RESULTS: A total of 352 estimations by 44 participants were evaluated. Accurate estimations improved significantly from pre-training to post-training (P<0.05). The sensitivity of blood volume quantification was 33.0% after training with the visual estimation tool. Estimations did not depend on age, profession, gender or years of the estimator's professional experience.
CONCLUSIONS: Training with a visual estimation tool by professional rescuers can improve the estimation accuracy of blood volumes spread on surfaces with varying absorptivity. Copyright: © World Journal of Emergency Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Academic training; Emergency medicine; Hemorrhage control; Major bleeding

Year:  2021        PMID: 34141030      PMCID: PMC8188276          DOI: 10.5847/wjem.j.1920-8642.2021.03.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Emerg Med        ISSN: 1920-8642


  16 in total

1.  Blood loss estimation in epistaxis scenarios.

Authors:  H L Beer; S Duvvi; C J Webb; S Tandon
Journal:  J Laryngol Otol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 1.469

2.  Improved accuracy of postpartum blood loss estimation as assessed by simulation.

Authors:  Sharon Maslovitz; Gad Barkai; Joseph B Lessing; Amitai Ziv; Ariel Many
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 3.636

3.  Improving the accuracy of estimated blood loss at obstetric haemorrhage using clinical reconstructions.

Authors:  P Bose; F Regan; S Paterson-Brown
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 6.531

4.  Proper estimation of blood loss on scene of trauma: tool or tale?

Authors:  Matthias Frank; Uli Schmucker; Dirk Stengel; Lutz Fischer; Joern Lange; Rico Grossjohann; Axel Ekkernkamp; Gerrit Matthes
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  2010-11

5.  Estimating blood loss: can teaching significantly improve visual estimation?

Authors:  Gary A Dildy; Archana R Paine; Natalie C George; Cruz Velasco
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 7.661

6.  External blood loss estimation using the MAR Method.

Authors:  Mark A Merlin; Scott M Alter; Brian Raffel; Peter W Pryor
Journal:  Am J Emerg Med       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 2.469

7.  Estimation of external blood loss by paramedics: is there any point?

Authors:  Brett Williams; Mal Boyle
Journal:  Prehosp Disaster Med       Date:  2007 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.040

8.  Improvement of blood loss volume estimation by paramedics using a pictorial nomogram: A developmental study.

Authors:  Chun Yu Yeung; Wai Wa Yim; Suet Yi Chan; Ronson Sze Long Lo; Ling Yan Leung; Kevin Kei Ching Hung; Colin A Graham
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2017-10-31       Impact factor: 2.586

9.  STARD 2015 guidelines for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies: explanation and elaboration.

Authors:  Jérémie F Cohen; Daniël A Korevaar; Douglas G Altman; David E Bruns; Constantine A Gatsonis; Lotty Hooft; Les Irwig; Deborah Levine; Johannes B Reitsma; Henrica C W de Vet; Patrick M M Bossuyt
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-11-14       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.