Literature DB >> 19931755

External blood loss estimation using the MAR Method.

Mark A Merlin1, Scott M Alter, Brian Raffel, Peter W Pryor.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: An element lacking in medical education is training to estimate blood volumes. Therefore, health care workers currently use visual estimation as their only means of determining blood volumes, which has shown to be highly inaccurate. This study proposes and tests a new method using one's fist to determine external blood loss.
METHODS: Increments of human whole blood were measured and used to compare fist size to surface area of blood present. A formula was created averaging blood per fist, hereafter known as the MAR Method. Two scenarios were staged using set quantities of blood (75 and 750 mL). Participants estimated blood volumes before and after being taught the MAR Method in a 1-minute session. Errors in estimation before and after using the MAR Method were compared.
RESULTS: The MAR Method was created using a fist to cover a surface area of blood that equals 20 mL. A total of 74 participants had errors of 120% and 73% for visualization of the small and large pools, respectively. For the smaller volume, the average error from the mean decreased by 76% (P < .0001), and the interquartile range of errors decreased by 60%. For the larger volume, the average error from the mean reduced by 40% (P < .0001), and the interquartile range of errors reduced by 45%.
CONCLUSION: Use of the MAR Method improves blood volume estimations. After less than 1 minute of instruction, participants were able to determine blood volumes with improved accuracy and precision.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19931755     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2008.07.039

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Emerg Med        ISSN: 0735-6757            Impact factor:   2.469


  5 in total

1.  Accuracy of training blood volume quantification using a visual estimation tool.

Authors:  Janett Kreutziger; Philip Puchner; Stefan Schmid; Wolfgang Mayer; Harald Prossliner; Wolfgang Lederer
Journal:  World J Emerg Med       Date:  2021

2.  Visual estimates of blood loss by medical laypeople: Effects of blood loss volume, victim gender, and perspective.

Authors:  Rachel Phillips; Marc Friberg; Mattias Lantz Cronqvist; Carl-Oscar Jonson; Erik Prytz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-11-12       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Comparison of the effect of web-based, simulation-based, and conventional training on the accuracy of visual estimation of postpartum hemorrhage volume on midwifery students: A randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Masoumeh Kordi; Farzaneh Rashidi Fakari; Seyed Reza Mazloum; Talaat Khadivzadeh; Farideh Akhlaghi; Mahmoud Tara
Journal:  J Educ Health Promot       Date:  2016-06-23

Review 4.  Comparison of common perioperative blood loss estimation techniques: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Lara Gerdessen; Patrick Meybohm; Suma Choorapoikayil; Eva Herrmann; Isabel Taeuber; Vanessa Neef; Florian J Raimann; Kai Zacharowski; Florian Piekarski
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2020-08-19       Impact factor: 2.502

5.  Proposition of a simple binary grading of estimated blood loss during colon surgery.

Authors:  Hugo Teixeira Farinha; David Martin; Audrey Ramó; Martin Hübner; Nicolas Demartines; Dieter Hahnloser
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2021-04-16       Impact factor: 2.571

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.