Keith G Phillips1, Rolf-Detlef Treede2, André Mouraux3, Petra Bloms-Funke4, Irmgard Boesl5, Ombretta Caspani2, Sonya C Chapman1, Giulia Di Stefano6, Nanna Brix Finnerup7, Luis Garcia-Larrea8, Marcus Goetz9, Anna Kostenko2, Bernhard Pelz9, Esther Pogatzki-Zahn10, Karin Schubart11, Alexandre Stouffs12, Andrea Truini6, Irene Tracey13, Iñaki F Troconiz14, Johannes Van Niel15, Jose Miguel Vela16, Katy Vincent17, Jan Vollert18, Vishvarani Wanigasekera13, Matthias Wittayer2. 1. Eli Lilly and Company, Erl Wood, UK. 2. Department of Neurophysiology, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany. 3. Institute of Neuroscience (IoNS), UCLouvain, Brussels, Belgium. andre.mouraux@uclouvain.be. 4. Translational Science & Intelligence, Grünenthal GmbH, Aachen, Germany. 5. Clinical Science Development, Grünenthal GmbH, Aachen, Germany. 6. Department of Human Neuroscience, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy. 7. Danish Pain Research Center, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark. 8. Lyon Neurosciences Center Research Unit Inserm U 1028, Pierre Wertheimer Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon 1 University, Lyon, France. 9. MRC Systems GmbH, Heidelberg, Germany. 10. Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany. 11. Consultech GmBH, Berlin, Germany. 12. Institute of Neuroscience (IoNS), UCLouvain, Brussels, Belgium. 13. Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. 14. Department of Pharmaceutical Technology and Chemistry, School of Pharmacy and Nutrition, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain. 15. Mature Products Development, Grünenthal GmbH, Aachen, Germany. 16. Drug Discovery & Preclinical Development, ESTEVE Pharmaceuticals, Barcelona, Spain. 17. Nuffield Department of Women's and Reproductive Health (NDWRH), University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. 18. Pain Research, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Abstract
BACKGROUND:IMI2-PainCare-BioPain-RCT3 is one of four similarly designed clinical studies aiming at profiling a set of functional biomarkers of drug effects on the nociceptive system that could serve to accelerate the future development of analgesics, by providing a quantitative understanding between drug exposure and effects of the drug on nociceptive signal processing in human volunteers. IMI2-PainCare-BioPain-RCT3 will focus on biomarkers derived from non-invasive electroencephalographic (EEG) measures of brain activity. METHODS: This is a multisite single-dose, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, 4-period, 4-way crossover, pharmacodynamic (PD) and pharmacokinetic (PK) study in healthy subjects. Biomarkers derived from scalp EEG measurements (laser-evoked brain potentials [LEPs], pinprick-evoked brain potentials [PEPs], resting EEG) will be obtained before and three times after administration of three medications known to act on the nociceptive system (lacosamide, pregabalin, tapentadol) and placebo, given as a single oral dose in separate study periods. Medication effects will be assessed concurrently in a non-sensitized normal condition and a clinically relevant hyperalgesic condition (high-frequency electrical stimulation of the skin). Patient-reported outcomes will also be collected. A sequentially rejective multiple testing approach will be used with overall alpha error of the primary analysis split between LEP and PEP under tapentadol. Remaining treatment arm effects on LEP or PEP or effects on EEG are key secondary confirmatory analyses. Complex statistical analyses and PK-PD modeling are exploratory. DISCUSSION: LEPs and PEPs are brain responses related to the selective activation of thermonociceptors and mechanonociceptors. Their amplitudes are dependent on the responsiveness of these nociceptors and the state of the pathways relaying nociceptive input at the level of the spinal cord and brain. The magnitude of resting EEG oscillations is sensitive to changes in brain network function, and some modulations of oscillation magnitude can relate to perceived pain intensity, variations in vigilance, and attentional states. These oscillations can also be affected by analgesic drugs acting on the central nervous system. For these reasons, IMI2-PainCare-BioPain-RCT3 hypothesizes that EEG-derived measures can serve as biomarkers of target engagement of analgesic drugs for future Phase 1 clinical trials. Phase 2 and 3 clinical trials could also benefit from these tools for patient stratification. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial was registered 25/06/2019 in EudraCT ( 2019%2D%2D001204-37 ).
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: IMI2-PainCare-BioPain-RCT3 is one of four similarly designed clinical studies aiming at profiling a set of functional biomarkers of drug effects on the nociceptive system that could serve to accelerate the future development of analgesics, by providing a quantitative understanding between drug exposure and effects of the drug on nociceptive signal processing in human volunteers. IMI2-PainCare-BioPain-RCT3 will focus on biomarkers derived from non-invasive electroencephalographic (EEG) measures of brain activity. METHODS: This is a multisite single-dose, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, 4-period, 4-way crossover, pharmacodynamic (PD) and pharmacokinetic (PK) study in healthy subjects. Biomarkers derived from scalp EEG measurements (laser-evoked brain potentials [LEPs], pinprick-evoked brain potentials [PEPs], resting EEG) will be obtained before and three times after administration of three medications known to act on the nociceptive system (lacosamide, pregabalin, tapentadol) and placebo, given as a single oral dose in separate study periods. Medication effects will be assessed concurrently in a non-sensitized normal condition and a clinically relevant hyperalgesic condition (high-frequency electrical stimulation of the skin). Patient-reported outcomes will also be collected. A sequentially rejective multiple testing approach will be used with overall alpha error of the primary analysis split between LEP and PEP under tapentadol. Remaining treatment arm effects on LEP or PEP or effects on EEG are key secondary confirmatory analyses. Complex statistical analyses and PK-PD modeling are exploratory. DISCUSSION: LEPs and PEPs are brain responses related to the selective activation of thermonociceptors and mechanonociceptors. Their amplitudes are dependent on the responsiveness of these nociceptors and the state of the pathways relaying nociceptive input at the level of the spinal cord and brain. The magnitude of resting EEG oscillations is sensitive to changes in brain network function, and some modulations of oscillation magnitude can relate to perceived pain intensity, variations in vigilance, and attentional states. These oscillations can also be affected by analgesic drugs acting on the central nervous system. For these reasons, IMI2-PainCare-BioPain-RCT3 hypothesizes that EEG-derived measures can serve as biomarkers of target engagement of analgesic drugs for future Phase 1 clinical trials. Phase 2 and 3 clinical trials could also benefit from these tools for patient stratification. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial was registered 25/06/2019 in EudraCT ( 2019%2D%2D001204-37 ).
Authors: Emanuel N van den Broeke; Bart de Vries; Julien Lambert; Diana M Torta; André Mouraux Journal: Clin Neurophysiol Date: 2017-05-19 Impact factor: 3.708
Authors: Zahra Nochi; Hossein Pia; Petra Bloms-Funke; Irmgard Boesl; Ombretta Caspani; Sonya C Chapman; Francesca Fardo; Bernd Genser; Marcus Goetz; Anna V Kostenko; Caterina Leone; Thomas Li; André Mouraux; Bernhard Pelz; Esther Pogatzki-Zahn; Andreas Schilder; Erik Schnetter; Karin Schubart; Alexandre Stouffs; Irene Tracey; Iñaki F Troconiz; Andrea Truini; Johannes Van Niel; Jose Miguel Vela; Katy Vincent; Jan Vollert; Vishvarani Wanigasekera; Matthias Wittayer; Hatice Tankisi; Nanna B Finnerup; Keith G Phillips; Rolf-Detlef Treede Journal: Trials Date: 2022-02-19 Impact factor: 2.279
Authors: Johannes van Niel; Petra Bloms-Funke; Ombretta Caspani; Jose Maria Cendros; Luis Garcia-Larrea; Andrea Truini; Irene Tracey; Sonya C Chapman; Nicolás Marco-Ariño; Iñaki F Troconiz; Keith Phillips; Nanna Brix Finnerup; André Mouraux; Rolf-Detlef Treede Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2022-07-27 Impact factor: 6.208
Authors: Caterina Leone; Giulia Di Stefano; Keith G Phillips; Andrea Truini; Rolf-Detlef Treede; Giuseppe Di Pietro; Petra Bloms-Funke; Irmgard Boesl; Ombretta Caspani; Sonya C Chapman; Nanna Brix Finnerup; Luis Garcia-Larrea; Tom Li; Marcus Goetz; André Mouraux; Bernhard Pelz; Esther Pogatzki-Zahn; Andreas Schilder; Erik Schnetter; Karin Schubart; Irene Tracey; Inaki F Troconiz; Hans Van Niel; Jose Miguel Vela Hernandez; Katy Vincent; Jan Vollert; Vishvarani Wanigasekera; Matthias Wittayer Journal: Trials Date: 2022-09-05 Impact factor: 2.728