Literature DB >> 3414004

Hemiretinal differences in speed of light detection in esotropic amblyopes.

L Chelazzi1, C A Marzi, G Panozzo, N Pasqualini, G Tassinari, L Tomazzoli.   

Abstract

Nine esotropic amblyopes were tested monocularly in a simple reaction time (RT) paradigm with brief suprathreshold flashes of light presented at various eccentricities along the horizontal meridian of the nasal or temporal hemiretinae. All were clinically amblyopic in one eye only. RT was significantly longer in the amblyopic than in the other eye at 1, 5 and 10 deg but not at 25 and 35 deg from the fovea. Another clearcut finding concerned hemiretinal differences: in the non-amblyopic eye, as in control subjects, RT was faster in the nasal than in the temporal hemiretina and such a difference increased with the eccentricity of stimulus presentation. In the amblyopic eye, however, the only significant hemiretinal effect was at 10 deg with a temporal retina advantage and at 35 deg with a nasal retinal advantage. Furthermore, unlike in normal control subjects and the non-amblyopic eye of our esotropes, in the amblyopic eye there was no increase in RT with the eccentricity of stimulus presentation, except for the most peripheral visual field positions. It can be concluded that esotropic amblyopia affects the speed of suprathreshold light detection in the most central 10 deg of visual field and that the nasal hemiretina is clearly more impaired than the temporal hemiretina.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3414004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  6 in total

1.  At what stage of manual visual reaction time does interhemispheric transmission occur: controlled or ballistic?

Authors:  C Cavina-Pratesi; E Bricolo; B Pellegrini; C A Marzi
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-12-12       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Monocular activation of V1 and V2 in amblyopic adults measured with functional magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Ian P Conner; J Vernon Odom; Terry L Schwartz; Janine D Mendola
Journal:  J AAPOS       Date:  2007-04-16       Impact factor: 1.220

3.  Hemispheric control of unilateral and bilateral responses to lateralized light stimuli after callosotomy and in callosal agenesis.

Authors:  S Aglioti; G Berlucchi; R Pallini; G F Rossi; G Tassinari
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Human amblyopia: structure of the visual field.

Authors:  R Sireteanu; M Fronius
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 5.  Visuomotor Behaviour in Amblyopia: Deficits and Compensatory Adaptations.

Authors:  Ewa Niechwiej-Szwedo; Linda Colpa; Agnes M F Wong
Journal:  Neural Plast       Date:  2019-06-09       Impact factor: 3.599

6.  The effects of incidentally learned temporal and spatial predictability on response times and visual fixations during target detection and discrimination.

Authors:  Melissa R Beck; S Lee Hong; Amanda E van Lamsweerde; Justin M Ericson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-14       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.