| Literature DB >> 34135899 |
Thais B Bertolini1, Jamie L Shirley2, Irene Zolotukhin2, Xin Li1, Tsuneyasu Kaisho3,4, Weidong Xiao1, Sandeep R P Kumar1, Roland W Herzog1.
Abstract
Adeno associated viral (AAV) vectors have emerged as a preferred platform for in vivo gene replacement therapy and represent one of the most promising strategies to treat monogenetic disorders such as hemophilia. However, immune responses to gene transfer have hampered human gene therapy in clinical trials. Over the past decade, it has become clear that innate immune recognition provides signals for the induction of antigen-specific responses against vector or transgene product. In particular, TLR9 recognition of the vector's DNA genome in plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDCs) has been identified as a key factor. Data from clinical trials and pre-clinical studies implement CpG motifs in the vector genome as drivers of immune responses, especially of CD8+ T cell activation. Here, we demonstrate that cross-priming of AAV capsid-specific CD8+ T cells depends on XCR1+ dendritic cells (which are likely the main cross-presenting cell that cooperates with pDCs to activate CD8+ T cells) and can be minimized by the elimination of CpG motifs in the vector genome. Further, a CpG-depleted vector expressing human coagulation factor IX showed markedly reduced (albeit not entirely eliminated) CD8+ T cell infiltration upon intramuscular gene transfer in hemophilia B mice when compared to conventional CpG+ vector (comprised of native sequences), resulting in better preservation of transduced muscle fibers. Therefore, this deimmunization strategy is helpful in reducing the potential for CD8+ T cell responses to capsid or transgene product. However, CpG depletion had minimal effects on antibody responses against capsid or transgene product, which appear to be largely independent of CpG motifs.Entities:
Keywords: CD8+ T cell; CpG; TLR9; adeno-associated virus; dendritic cells; gene therapy; hemophilia
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34135899 PMCID: PMC8200677 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.672449
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Immunol ISSN: 1664-3224 Impact factor: 7.561
Figure 1XCR1+ DCs required for cross-priming of capsid specific CD8+ T cells. (A) Experimental timeline showing treatment of XCR1+/DTRvenus mice with DT to ablate XCR1+ DCs. (B) Representative flow cytometry plots showing CD8α+CD11chi DCs and XCR1+YFP+ DCs (“venus” reporter) from DT treated and untreated mice. (C) Anti-capsid CD8+ T cell response reported as percent tetramer+CD8+ T cells at 7-, 10- and 14-day time points. (D) Experimental timeline showing treatment of C57BL/6 WT mice with anti-CD103 antibody to neutralize CD103+ DCs. (E) Percentage of tetramer+CD8+ T cells over time in anti-CD103 antibody treated and untreated mice. Data are average ± SEM of at least five animals per group. Each circle represents an individual animal. Statistically significant differences are indicated. ***P < 0.001, ****P < 0.0001.
Figure 2Absence of CpG motifs significantly reduce the percentage of AAV capsid specific CD8+ T cells but does not impact capsid-specific antibody formation. (A) Schematic representation of CpG-free expression cassette encoding hFIX with padua mutation. This cassette was packaged into AAV2-SIINFEKL capsid. (B) Experimental timeline of WT C57BL/6 mice injected with either AAV2-SIINFEKL-CpG+ or AAV2-SIINFEKL-CpG− vector. (C) Representative flow plots showing AAV capsid-specific CD8+ T cells at different time points in mice injected with AAV2-SIINFEKL-CpG+ and AAV2-SIINFEKL-CpG− vector. (D) Percentages of capsid specific CD8+ T cell in mice injected with AAV2-SIINFEKL-CpG+ and AAV2-SIINFEKL-CpG− vector. The dotted line at 0.045% represents the limit of detection of capsid specific CD8+ T cells using the tetramer. (E) Anti-AAV2 IgG2c antibody titers in plasma samples from mice injected with AAV2-SIINFEKL-CpG+ or AAV2-SIINFEKL-CpG− vector. Samples were collected at days 14 and 28 post vector injection. Data are average ± SEM of at least five animals per group. Each circle represents an individual animal. Statistically significant differences are indicated. *P < 0.05, ****P < 0.0001.
Figure 3CpG depletion has no effect on antibody formation against capsid but changes the dynamics of the anti-hFIX response in hemophilia B mice. (A) Experimental timeline of hemophilia B (C3H/HeJ F9−/Y) mice injected with AAV1-CpG+ or AAV1-CpG− vector. (B) Anti-AAV1 IgG2a antibody titers in plasma samples of hemophilia B mice injected with AAV1-CpG+ or AAV1-CpG− vector. Samples were collected at day 14 and 28 post vector injection. (C) anti-hFIX IgG1 antibody titers anti-AAV1 IgG2a antibody titers in plasma samples of hemophilia B mice injected with AAV1-CpG+ or AAV1-CpG− vector. (D) Bethesda inhibitor titers (BU/ml) in plasma samples of hemophilia B mice injected with AAV1-CpG+ or AAV1-CpG− vector. (E) Correlation between inhibitor titer at different time points within the same group. (F) Percent hFIX coagulation activity as assessed by Rossix ROX Factor IX chromogenic assay. Data are average ± SEM of at least four animals per group and is representative of two independent experiments. Each circle represents an individual animal. Statistically significant differences are indicated. **P < 0.01.
Figure 4hFIX expression and CD8+ T cell infiltration in transduced muscles. Skeletal muscles from hemophilia B (C3H/HeJ F9−/Y) mice were harvested, cryosectioned, and stained for hFIX (red) and CD8 (green) 4 weeks after AAV1-CpG− or AAV1-CpG+ injection, as described in Figure 3A. Muscles section was entirely scan and images were taken for both channels using a 40× objective with ZEISS Microscopy. (A) Sequential scan image of transduced muscle from AAV1-CpG+ (left) or AAV1-CpG− (right) injected mice shown for individual channel or merge image. (B) Numbers of infiltrating CD8+ T cells in transduced muscle as quantified by Fiji-ImageJ software after generating a grid (area per point, 1200 square pixels). Whole muscle sections were quantified. (C) Fluorescent signal for hFIX quantified as mean gray value with Fiji-ImageJ software. Representative images from five mice are shown for each condition. The scale bar represents 100 μm. Data are average ± SEM of at least five animals per group. Each circle represents an individual animal. Statistically significant differences are indicated. *P < 0.05.