| Literature DB >> 34132807 |
Weihong He1, Charlotte S McCarroll1, Katrin Nather1, Kristopher Ford1, Kenneth Mangion1,2, Alexandra Riddell1, Dylan O'Toole1, Ali Zaeri1, David Corcoran1,2, David Carrick1,2, Mathew M Y Lee1,2, Margaret McEntegart2, Andrew Davie2, Richard Good2, Mitchell M Lindsay2, Hany Eteiba2, Paul Rocchiccioli2, Stuart Watkins2, Stuart Hood2, Aadil Shaukat2, Lisa McArthur1, Elspeth B Elliott1, John McClure1, Catherine Hawksby1, Tamara Martin1, Mark C Petrie1,2, Keith G Oldroyd2, Godfrey L Smith1, Keith M Channon3, Colin Berry1,2, Stuart A Nicklin1, Christopher M Loughrey1.
Abstract
AIMS: Identifying novel mediators of lethal myocardial reperfusion injury that can be targeted during primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) is key to limiting the progression of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) to heart failure. Here, we show through parallel clinical and integrative preclinical studies the significance of the protease cathepsin-L on cardiac function during reperfusion injury. METHODS ANDEntities:
Keywords: Calcium; Cardiomyocytes; Reperfusion injury; Sarcoplasmic reticulum; Myocardial infarction
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 34132807 PMCID: PMC9074968 DOI: 10.1093/cvr/cvab204
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cardiovasc Res ISSN: 0008-6363 Impact factor: 13.081
Figure 1Cathepsin-L levels among STEMI patients with divergent outcomes. Full details for this figure are provided elsewhere (Supplementary material online, extended legend). (A–D) Data for a patient with high level of cathepsin [2.12 ng.mg−1 total protein (TP) Log10]. (A) Pre-PPCI ECG. (B) Angiography pre-PPCI (top) and post-PPI (bottom). The yellow arrows indicate restoration of TIMI 3 flow. (C) Cardiac MRI performed pre-PPCI (top) and post-PPI (bottom) showing remote myocardium (blue) and ischaemic myocardium (grey; yellow arrows). (D) Infarct size pre-PPCI (top) and post-PPI (bottom) showing normal myocardium nulled to black; acute scar depicted as hyperenhanced (white); and a central hypoenhanced region representing microvascular obstruction. (E–H) Data from a patient with a low level of cathepsin (1.84 ng.mg−1 TP Log10). (E) Pre-PPCI ECG. (F) Angiography pre-PPCI (top) and post-PPI (bottom). (G) Cardiac MRI performed pre-PPCI (top) and post-PPI (bottom). (H) Infarct size pre-PPCI (top) and post-PPI (bottom). (I) Serum cathepsin-L levels among patients undergoing PPCI. (J–L) Correlations (P < 0.05) between MRI parameters at 24 h post-PPCI (black) and 6 months post-PPCI (red) and the area under the curve (AUC) of cathepsin-L levels measured in the first 24 h post-MI. (J) LV ejection fraction. (K) Stroke volume indexed for body surface area (right). (L) Cardiac index. (M) Infarct size (see Supplementary material online, for n values for I–M). (N–P) Cathepsin-L levels among STEMI patients immediately after primary PCI (n = 26). Cathepsin-L levels in (N) Venous (O) Aortic root and coronary sinus blood samples, allowing determination of (P) Cardiac and systemic release (above 0) and extraction (below 0) ratios. Data were assessed for normality and are expressed as mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM). Statistical comparisons were made by a two-sample Student’s T-test on the raw data. Multiple groups were compared with analysis of variance (ANOVA). A significance level of P < 0.05 was considered significant. Pearson correlation was used to investigate the association between log10 cathepsin levels and subsequent MRI parameters in patients undergoing PPCI.
Figure 3Haemodynamic and cardiac function in reperfused mouse hearts treated with the cathepsin-L inhibitor CAA0225 in vivo. Data were collected at 2 weeks and 4 weeks after reperfusion. (A) Typical pressure volume (PV) loops. (B) Mean PV loop intra-LV pressure measurements for IR+ DMSO (n = 5) and IR = CAA0225 (n = 4). (C) Mean rate of intra-LV pressure change. (D) Mean intra-LV volume. (E) Typical M-mode echocardiographic images of IR+DMSO and IR+CAA0225 at 4 weeks post-reperfusion. (F–J) Mean echocardiographic data at 4 weeks post-reperfusion for IR+DMSO (n = 7) and IR+CAA0225 (n = 8). (F) Fractional shortening (FS). (G) LV internal diameter at systole (LVIDs). (H) LVID at diastole (LVIDd). (I) LV posterior wall thickness at diastole (LVPWd). (J) LVPW thickness at systole (LVPWs). * P < 0.05. Data were assessed for normality and are expressed as mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM). Statistical comparisons were made by a two-sample Student’s T-test on the raw data. Multiple groups were compared with analysis of variance (ANOVA). A significance level of P < 0.05 was considered significant.
Figure 4Cardiac function in ex vivo rat hearts during IR injury pretreated with the cathepsin-L inhibitor CAA0225. (A) Schematic of the three protocols used. (B) Cathepsin-L activity measured in left ventricular tissue IR+DMSO (white bar; n = 5) and IR+CAA0225 (red bar; n = 5). (C) Typical TTC staining of heart slices, where the red staining represents live tissue and the pale unstained colour is dead tissue (3 mm scale bar). The mean infarct size is shown on the right for IR+DMSO (n = 11) and IR+CAA0225 (n = 6). (D) Typical LV pressure measured at the time point shown in part A of this figure (*). (E–H) Mean LV pressure data for DMSO (n = 6), IR+DMSO (n = 15) and IR+CAA0225 (n = 6). (E) Developed LV pressure. (F) Maximum rate of rise (dP/dtmax). (G) Maximum rate of fall (dP/dtmin). (H) Minimum (Pmin). *P < 0.05. Data were assessed for normality and are expressed as mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM). Statistical comparisons were made by a two-sample Student’s T-test on the raw data. Multiple groups were compared with analysis of variance (ANOVA). A significance level of P < 0.05 was considered significant. In experiments involving serial measurements on ex vivo hearts the final measurement was taken as the relevant summary statistic in order to answer the research hypothesis of whether there would be changes in population mean values between treatment groups by the end of the experiment.
Figure 5Cardiac function in ex vivo rat hearts during IR injury treated upon reperfusion with the cathepsin-L inhibitor CAA0225. (A) Schematic of the two protocols used. (B) Typical TTC staining of heart slices, where the red staining represents live tissue and the pale unstained colour is dead tissue (3 mm scale bar). The mean infarct size is shown on the right for IR+DMSO (n = 5) and IR+CAA0225 (n = 7). (C) Typical LV pressure measured at the time point shown in part A of this figure (*). (D–G) Mean LV pressure data for IR+DMSO (n = 5) and IR+CAA0225 (n = 7). (D) Developed LV pressure. (E) Maximum rate of rise (dP/dtmax). (F) Maximum rate of fall (dP/dtmin). (G) Minimum pressure (Pmin). *P < 0.05. Data were assessed for normality and are expressed as mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM). Statistical comparisons were made by a two-sample Student’s T-test on the raw data. Multiple groups were compared with analysis of variance (ANOVA). A significance level of P < 0.05 was considered significant. In experiments involving serial measurements on ex vivo hearts, the final measurement was taken as the relevant summary statistic in order to answer the research hypothesis of whether there would be changes in population mean values between treatment groups by the end of the experiment.