| Literature DB >> 34131834 |
Andrea Meinhardt1, Paula C Ramos2, R Jürgen Dohmen2, Nadja Lucas3, Min Ae Lee-Kirsch3, Benjamin Becker1, Jan de Laffolie1, Tomás Cunha4, Tim Niehues5, Ulrich Salzer6, Ayami Yoshimi7, Miriam Erlacher7, Anke M J Peters7, Stephan Ehl6, Brigitte Strahm7, Carsten Speckmann8,9.
Abstract
Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34131834 PMCID: PMC8452576 DOI: 10.1007/s10875-021-01067-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Clin Immunol ISSN: 0271-9142 Impact factor: 8.317
Fig. 1Clinical and experimental overview of P1. (A) Pedigree of P1. (B) Clinical skin phenotype before HSCT. (C) Hematoxylin and eosin staining of a skin biopsy (10x magnified) showing perivascular lympho-histiocytic infiltrates. (D) Immunodetection of POMP and its truncated version (POMPtrunc), precursor (proβ2), and mature forms of subunit β2 (PSMB7). Control (C) and patient (P1) fibroblasts were treated with 150 units/mL IFNγ (Peprotech 300–02) and 1 µM MG132 (Sigma-Aldrich C2211) for 24 h. Proteins were extracted in 50 mM Tris pH 7.5 buffer containing 2 mM ATP, 5 mM MgCl2, 1 mM DTT, and 15% glycerol. From each sample, 10 μg of protein were analyzed by SDS-PAGE(12%) and western blotting (PVDF) with 1:1000 anti-POMP monoclonal antibody (D2X9S, Cell Signaling Technology) as well as anti-β2 monoclonal antibody (MCP168 ENZO Life Sciences). Beta 2 protein was immunostained as loading control. (E) Comparison of the chymotryptic activity profiles of proteins extracted from control and patient fibroblasts proteins after gel filtration fractionation (superose 6; flow rate 0.3 mL/min; fraction volume 0.5 mL). The column was calibrated with ferritin (440 kDa) and catalase (240 kDa). (F) RT-PCR analysis of interferon-stimulated genes (before and 1.8 years post-HSCT) in PBMC and (G) fibroblasts. RNA extraction as well as expression analysis of the indicated genes, using quantitative real-time RT-PCR, was carried out as previously reported [10]. (H) Strongly increased IFN score in PBMC of P1 vs. Aicardi-Goutières syndrome (AGS controls). The score was calculated as previously described [10]. In short, gene expression of IFN-stimulated genes was measured by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction in the presence of a calibrator and normalized to the expression of two housekeeping genes. For comparison with healthy individuals, an IFN score of 12.49 (dashed line) indicates the median IFN score of 10 healthy controls plus 2 SD