| Literature DB >> 34130499 |
Peter T Rühr1, Thomas van de Kamp2,3, Tomáš Faragó3, Jörg U Hammel4, Fabian Wilde4, Elena Borisova5, Carina Edel1, Melina Frenzel1, Tilo Baumbach2,3, Alexander Blanke1,6.
Abstract
Most animals undergo ecological niche shifts between distinct life phases, but such shifts can result in adaptive conflicts of phenotypic traits. Metamorphosis can reduce these conflicts by breaking up trait correlations, allowing each life phase to independently adapt to its ecological niche. This process is called adaptive decoupling. It is, however, yet unknown to what extent adaptive decoupling is realized on a macroevolutionary scale in hemimetabolous insects and if the degree of adaptive decoupling is correlated with the strength of ontogenetic niche shifts. It is also unclear whether the degree of adaptive decoupling is correlated with phenotypic disparity. Here, we quantify nymphal and adult trait correlations in 219 species across the whole phylogeny of earwigs and stoneflies to test whether juvenile and adult traits are decoupled from each other. We demonstrate that adult head morphology is largely driven by nymphal ecology, and that adult head shape disparity has increased with stronger ontogenetic niche shifts in some stonefly lineages. Our findings implicate that the hemimetabolan metamorphosis in earwigs and stoneflies does not allow for high degrees of adaptive decoupling, and that high phenotypic disparity can even be realized when the evolution of distinct life phases is coupled.Entities:
Keywords: adaptive decoupling; complex life cycles; disparity; geometric morphometrics; metamorphosis; ontogenetic niche shifts
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34130499 PMCID: PMC8206691 DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2021.0616
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Proc Biol Sci ISSN: 0962-8452 Impact factor: 5.349
Figure 1Overview of microhabitat occupation by nymphal and adult earwigs and stoneflies. Insect pictograms indicate different taxa and life stages. Habitat preference colour-coded. (Online version in colour.)
Multivariate integrations of head shape (left) and mandible shape (right) of earwigs and stoneflies with ecological covariates expressed as effect sizes (z-scores) of phylogenetic partial least square results. Non-significant interactions left blank. See electronic supplementary material, table S9 for more statistical details and all test results. hydrodyn. p., hydrodynamic pressure; microh., microhabitat.
Figure 2Head capsule phylomorphospace of adult earwigs and stoneflies. Principal component (PC) 1 and PC2 (upper part) and PC1 and PC3 (lower part) account for approximately 54% of the shape variation. Point colours represent superfamily level memberships, smoothed convex hulls show order-level memberships. Schematic drawings of the dorsal (including tentorial structures in grey) and lateral head shapes are based on µCT scans. Drawings are shown for selected species (black bordered points) at the edges of the phylomorphospace spanned by the first three PCs. Schematics not to scale. See electronic supplementary material, figure S3 for an overview of the first 8 PCs. (Online version in colour.)
Figure 3Morpho-ecological landscape illustrating the relationship of adult head shape with the feeding ecologies of nymphs (upper tiles) and adults (lower tiles). All tiles are overlaid with the phylomorphospace explained by the first two principal components of adult head shape in earwigs (dark green) and stoneflies (bright green). PC1 of nymphal food preference (a) mainly represents detritivoric (blue) versus predatory (red) habits, while PCo1 of adult feeding ecology (b) mainly represents herbivorous (blue) versus predatory (red) habits (see electronic supplementary material, figure S4 for PCoA biplots). Tiles (c–k) show density estimations of species with mainly non-feeding, (c,d), predatory (e,f), herbivorous (g,h) and (j,k) detritivoric nymphs and adults, respectively, to illustrate shifts of feeding habits across metamorphosis. Notable shifts in feeding habits are indicated by dashed arrows for clarity. (Online version in colour.)