Literature DB >> 27592864

On the comparison of the strength of morphological integration across morphometric datasets.

Dean C Adams1,2, Michael L Collyer3.   

Abstract

Evolutionary morphologists frequently wish to understand the extent to which organisms are integrated, and whether the strength of morphological integration among subsets of phenotypic variables differ among taxa or other groups. However, comparisons of the strength of integration across datasets are difficult, in part because the summary measures that characterize these patterns (RV coefficient and rPLS ) are dependent both on sample size and on the number of variables. As a solution to this issue, we propose a standardized test statistic (a z-score) for measuring the degree of morphological integration between sets of variables. The approach is based on a partial least squares analysis of trait covariation, and its permutation-based sampling distribution. Under the null hypothesis of a random association of variables, the method displays a constant expected value and confidence intervals for datasets of differing sample sizes and variable number, thereby providing a consistent measure of integration suitable for comparisons across datasets. A two-sample test is also proposed to statistically determine whether levels of integration differ between datasets, and an empirical example examining cranial shape integration in Mediterranean wall lizards illustrates its use. Some extensions of the procedure are also discussed.
© 2016 The Author(s). Evolution © 2016 The Society for the Study of Evolution.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Geometric morphometrics; Morphological evolution; morphological integration

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27592864     DOI: 10.1111/evo.13045

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  26 in total

1.  Phenotypic integration and modularity drives skull shape divergence in the Arctic fox (Vulpes lagopus) from the Commander Islands.

Authors:  Alberto Martín-Serra; Olga Nanova; Ceferino Varón-González; Germán Ortega; Borja Figueirido
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2019-09-25       Impact factor: 3.703

2.  Widespread ecomorphological convergence in multiple fish families spanning the marine-freshwater interface.

Authors:  Aaron M Davis; Ricardo Betancur-R
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-05-17       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Patterns of skeletal integration in birds reveal that adaptation of element shapes enables coordinated evolution between anatomical modules.

Authors:  Andrew Orkney; Alex Bjarnason; Brigit C Tronrud; Roger B J Benson
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-07-19       Impact factor: 15.460

4.  Measuring the magnitude of morphological integration: The effect of differences in morphometric representations and the inclusion of size.

Authors:  Fabio A Machado; Alex Hubbe; Diogo Melo; Arthur Porto; Gabriel Marroig
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2019-10-28       Impact factor: 3.694

5.  Weak genetic signal for phenotypic integration implicates developmental processes as major regulators of trait covariation.

Authors:  Andrew J Conith; Sylvie A Hope; Brian H Chhouk; R Craig Albertson
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2020-12-06       Impact factor: 6.185

6.  Homeostatic Left Heart integration and disintegration links atrio-ventricular covariation's dyshomeostasis in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Paolo Piras; Concetta Torromeo; Antonietta Evangelista; Stefano Gabriele; Giuseppe Esposito; Paola Nardinocchi; Luciano Teresi; Andrea Madeo; Michele Schiariti; Valerio Varano; Paolo Emilio Puddu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-07-24       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Integration drives rapid phenotypic evolution in flatfishes.

Authors:  Kory M Evans; Olivier Larouche; Sara-Jane Watson; Stacy Farina; María Laura Habegger; Matt Friedman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-05-04       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Head and mandible shapes are highly integrated yet represent two distinct modules within and among worker subcastes of the ant genus Pheidole.

Authors:  Alexandre Casadei-Ferreira; Nicholas R Friedman; Evan P Economo; Marcio R Pie; Rodrigo M Feitosa
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-05-01       Impact factor: 2.912

9.  Juvenile ecology drives adult morphology in two insect orders.

Authors:  Peter T Rühr; Thomas van de Kamp; Tomáš Faragó; Jörg U Hammel; Fabian Wilde; Elena Borisova; Carina Edel; Melina Frenzel; Tilo Baumbach; Alexander Blanke
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-06-16       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Rates of morphological evolution, asymmetry and morphological integration of shell shape in scallops.

Authors:  Emma Sherratt; Jeanne M Serb; Dean C Adams
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2017-12-08       Impact factor: 3.260

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.