Literature DB >> 34130352

Inverse probability weighting is an effective method to address selection bias during the analysis of high dimensional data.

Patrick M Carry1,2, Lauren A Vanderlinden1,3, Fran Dong4, Teresa Buckner1, Elizabeth Litkowski1, Timothy Vigers3, Jill M Norris1, Katerina Kechris3.   

Abstract

Omics studies frequently use samples collected during cohort studies. Conditioning on sample availability can cause selection bias if sample availability is nonrandom. Inverse probability weighting (IPW) is purported to reduce this bias. We evaluated IPW in an epigenome-wide analysis testing the association between DNA methylation (261,435 probes) and age in healthy adolescent subjects (n = 114). We simulated age and sex to be correlated with sample selection and then evaluated four conditions: complete population/no selection bias (all subjects), naïve selection bias (no adjustment), and IPW selection bias (selection bias with IPW adjustment). Assuming the complete population condition represented the "truth," we compared each condition to the complete population condition. Bias or difference in associations between age and methylation was reduced in the IPW condition versus the naïve condition. However, genomic inflation and type 1 error were higher in the IPW condition relative to the naïve condition. Postadjustment using bacon, type 1 error and inflation were similar across all conditions. Power was higher under the IPW condition compared with the naïve condition before and after inflation adjustment. IPW methods can reduce bias in genome-wide analyses. Genomic inflation is a potential concern that can be minimized using methods that adjust for inflation.
© 2021 Wiley Periodicals LLC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DAISY; DNA methylation; inverse probability weighting; selection bias

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34130352      PMCID: PMC8376760          DOI: 10.1002/gepi.22418

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genet Epidemiol        ISSN: 0741-0395            Impact factor:   2.344


  20 in total

1.  Genomic control for association studies.

Authors:  B Devlin; K Roeder
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  A structural approach to selection bias.

Authors:  Miguel A Hernán; Sonia Hernández-Díaz; James M Robins
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.822

3.  The sva package for removing batch effects and other unwanted variation in high-throughput experiments.

Authors:  Jeffrey T Leek; W Evan Johnson; Hilary S Parker; Andrew E Jaffe; John D Storey
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2012-01-17       Impact factor: 6.937

4.  Illustrating bias due to conditioning on a collider.

Authors:  Stephen R Cole; Robert W Platt; Enrique F Schisterman; Haitao Chu; Daniel Westreich; David Richardson; Charles Poole
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2009-11-19       Impact factor: 7.196

5.  Causal diagrams for epidemiologic research.

Authors:  S Greenland; J Pearl; J M Robins
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 4.822

6.  Selection Bias Due to Loss to Follow Up in Cohort Studies.

Authors:  Chanelle J Howe; Stephen R Cole; Bryan Lau; Sonia Napravnik; Joseph J Eron
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 4.822

7.  Minfi: a flexible and comprehensive Bioconductor package for the analysis of Infinium DNA methylation microarrays.

Authors:  Martin J Aryee; Andrew E Jaffe; Hector Corrada-Bravo; Christine Ladd-Acosta; Andrew P Feinberg; Kasper D Hansen; Rafael A Irizarry
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2014-01-28       Impact factor: 6.937

8.  Controlling bias and inflation in epigenome- and transcriptome-wide association studies using the empirical null distribution.

Authors:  Maarten van Iterson; Erik W van Zwet; Bastiaan T Heijmans
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2017-01-27       Impact factor: 13.583

9.  DNA methylation arrays as surrogate measures of cell mixture distribution.

Authors:  Eugene Andres Houseman; William P Accomando; Devin C Koestler; Brock C Christensen; Carmen J Marsit; Heather H Nelson; John K Wiencke; Karl T Kelsey
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2012-05-08       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Longitudinal DNA methylation differences precede type 1 diabetes.

Authors:  Randi K Johnson; Lauren A Vanderlinden; Fran Dong; Patrick M Carry; Jennifer Seifert; Kathleen Waugh; Hanan Shorrosh; Tasha Fingerlin; Brigitte I Frohnert; Ivana V Yang; Katerina Kechris; Marian Rewers; Jill M Norris
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-02-28       Impact factor: 4.379

View more
  1 in total

1.  Adaptive Dynamic Therapy and Survivorship for Operable Pancreatic Cancer.

Authors:  Samer AlMasri; Mazen Zenati; Abdulrahman Hammad; Ibrahim Nassour; Hao Liu; Melissa E Hogg; Herbert J Zeh; Brian Boone; Nathan Bahary; Aatur D Singhi; Kenneth K Lee; Alessandro Paniccia; Amer H Zureikat
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2022-06-01
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.