| Literature DB >> 34129598 |
Ali Jasem Buabbas1, Huda Hasan2, Mohammad Abbas Buabbas3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Smart devices (SDs) are widely used among adolescents. Numerous studies have recommended further research on this topic to find out the prevalence of SD overuse among school students and to what extent this is associated with psychological distress. The present study aimed to investigate the pattern of SD use among secondary and high school students in the state of Kuwait, as well as the possible associations with psychological problems, weight, physical activity, and school performance.Entities:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34129598 PMCID: PMC8205156 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251479
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Demographic data of the participants.
| Variable | n | % |
|---|---|---|
* Missing data was excluded from analysis.
Means, SDs, and ANOVA for the variables according to the total hours of SD use per day.
| Variables | M | SD | η2 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 178.99 | .153↑ | |||
| 25.70 | .025↓ | |||
| 7.53 | .008↓ | |||
| 13.78 | .014↓ |
*** p < .001
Means, SDs, and ANOVA for the variables according to the total hours of SD use per session.
| Variables | M | SD | η2 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 59.36 | .057↓ | |||
| 3.59 | .004↓ | |||
| .22 (NS) | ||||
| 3.79 | .004↓ |
* p < .05
*** p < .001. Note: Missing data was excluded from the analysis.
Correlations between the variables (n = 1993).
| Variables | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | ||||
| .42 | - | |||
| .29 | .67 | - | ||
| .32 | .65 | .63 | - | |
| .06 | .09 | .11 | .08 |
* p < .05
** p < .01
T-tests comparing males (n = 947) and females (n = 1,046) in the study variables (df = 1991).
| Variables | M | SD | Cohen’s | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7.64 | .028↓ | |||
| 16.31 | .118↑ | |||
| 12.84 | .077→ | |||
| 9.55 | .044↓ |
*** p < .001
T-tests comparing secondary school students (n = 974) and high school students (n = 1,019) in the study variables (df = 1991).
| Variables | M | SD | Cohen’s | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.79 | .004↓ | |||
| 3.82 | .007↓ | |||
| 3.06 | .005↓ | |||
| 4.50 | .010↓ |
** p < .01
*** p < .001
Means, SDs, and ANOVA for the variables according to school performance level.
| Variables | M | SD | η2 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4.64 | .009↓ | |||
| 2.66 | .005↓ | |||
| 1.24 (NS) | ||||
| 3.98 | .008↓ |
*p < .05
**p < .01
***p < .001, F (<60), D (60–69), C (70–79), B (80–89), A (90–100).
T-tests comparing physically inactive students (n = 1,194) and active students (n = 788) in the study variables (df = 1980).
| Variables | M | SD | Cohen’s | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8.14 | .032↓ | |||
| 2.82 | .004↓ | |||
| 2.21 | .002↓ | |||
| 2.44 | .003↓ |
* p < .05
** p < .01
*** p < .001