Literature DB >> 34125252

Machine learning reveals the most important psychological and social variables predicting the differential diagnosis of rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases.

Germano Vera Cruz1,2,3, Emilie Bucourt4, Christian Réveillère4, Virginie Martaillé5, Isabelle Joncker-Vannier6, Philippe Goupille7,8, Denis Mulleman7,8, Robert Courtois4,9.   

Abstract

There is an ongoing debate about the importance and the extent to which psychological and psychopathological factors, adverse childhood experiences, and socio-demographic characteristics are associated with the development of certain types of rheumatic disease. With the aim of contributing to knowledge on the subject, the present study uses machine learning modeling to determine the importance of 20 psychological and social variables in predicting two classes of rheumatic disease: inflammatory rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases (RMD) (rheumatoid arthritis = RA, spondyloarthritis = SA, and Sjögren's syndrome = SS) versus non-inflammatory RMD, namely fibromyalgia = FM). A total of 165 French women with FM, RA, SA, and SS completed an inventory of personality traits, a psychopathology diagnosis questionnaire, and a fatigue/pain questionnaire. They also answered questions about adverse childhood experiences and socio-demographic characteristics. Random forest and logistic regression machine learning algorithms were used for data analysis. The main findings suggest that mistreatment during childhood ((MDA = 10.22), the agreeableness personality trait (MDA = 3.39), and somatic disorder (MDA = 3.25) are the main psychological and social predictors of the type of rheumatic disease diagnosed. The first two predictors (OR = 18.92 and OR = 6.11) are also more strongly associated with FM than with RA-SA-SS. Overall, adverse childhood experiences seem relatively more important than personality traits, psychopathological or demographic variables. The results of this study suggest that traumatic childhood experiences may lead to psychopathological disorders in adulthood, which in turn might underlie, at least in part, the development of FM. Since there are no imaging or biological markers of FM, the present findings contribute to the scientific literature offering information to help patients with FM understand their pathology. They may also provide physicians with more diagnostic information.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Machine learning; Psychological/social predictors; Rheumatism diagnosis

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34125252     DOI: 10.1007/s00296-021-04916-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rheumatol Int        ISSN: 0172-8172            Impact factor:   2.631


  22 in total

1.  The relationship between childhood adversities and fibromyalgia in the general population.

Authors:  Aleksi Varinen; Elise Kosunen; Kari Mattila; Tuomas Koskela; Markku Sumanen
Journal:  J Psychosom Res       Date:  2017-06-16       Impact factor: 3.006

2.  Adverse Childhood Experiences Are Not Associated With Patient-reported Outcome Measures in Patients With Musculoskeletal Illness.

Authors:  Janna S E Ottenhoff; Joost T P Kortlever; Emily Z Boersma; David C Laverty; David Ring; Matthew D Driscoll
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Psychosocial factors in fibromyalgia compared with rheumatoid arthritis: II. Sexual, physical, and emotional abuse and neglect.

Authors:  E A Walker; D Keegan; G Gardner; M Sullivan; D Bernstein; W J Katon
Journal:  Psychosom Med       Date:  1997 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.312

4.  Gender-specific association between childhood trauma and rheumatoid arthritis: a case-control study.

Authors:  Carsten Spitzer; Stefanie Wegert; Jürgen Wollenhaupt; Katja Wingenfeld; Sven Barnow; Hans Joergen Grabe
Journal:  J Psychosom Res       Date:  2012-11-10       Impact factor: 3.006

5.  Fibromyalgia syndrome in the general population of France: a prevalence study.

Authors:  Bernard Bannwarth; Francis Blotman; Katell Roué-Le Lay; Jean-Paul Caubère; Etienne André; Charles Taïeb
Journal:  Joint Bone Spine       Date:  2008-09-25       Impact factor: 4.929

6.  Fibromyalgia characterization in a psychosocial approach.

Authors:  Barbara Gonzalez; Telmo M Baptista; Jaime C Branco; Rosa F Novo
Journal:  Psychol Health Med       Date:  2014-06-25       Impact factor: 2.423

7.  Comparison of the Big Five personality traits in fibromyalgia and other rheumatic diseases.

Authors:  Emilie Bucourt; Virginie Martaillé; Denis Mulleman; Philippe Goupille; Isabelle Joncker-Vannier; Brigitte Huttenberger; Christian Reveillere; Robert Courtois
Journal:  Joint Bone Spine       Date:  2016-06-03       Impact factor: 4.929

8.  Evaluation of personality profile in patients with fibromyalgia syndrome and healthy controls.

Authors:  Meltem Vural; Tonguc Demir Berkol; Zeynep Erdogdu; Batuhan Kucukserat; Cihan Aksoy
Journal:  Mod Rheumatol       Date:  2013-12-29       Impact factor: 3.023

Review 9.  Facts and myths pertaining to fibromyalgia.

Authors:  Winfried Häuser; Mary-Ann Fitzcharles
Journal:  Dialogues Clin Neurosci       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 5.986

Review 10.  History of fibromyalgia: past to present.

Authors:  Fatma Inanici; Muhammad B Yunus
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2004-10
View more
  1 in total

1.  An MRI-Based Clinical-Perfusion Model Predicts Pathological Subtypes of Prevascular Mediastinal Tumors.

Authors:  Chia-Ying Lin; Yi-Ting Yen; Li-Ting Huang; Tsai-Yun Chen; Yi-Sheng Liu; Shih-Yao Tang; Wei-Li Huang; Ying-Yuan Chen; Chao-Han Lai; Yu-Hua Dean Fang; Chao-Chun Chang; Yau-Lin Tseng
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-02
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.