Literature DB >> 34124893

Improving Docking Power for Short Peptides Using Random Forest.

Michel F Sanner1, Leonard Dieguez2, Stefano Forli1, Ewa Lis2.   

Abstract

In recent years, therapeutic peptides have gained a lot interest as demonstrated by the 60 peptides approved as drugs in major markets and 150+ peptides currently in clinical trials. However, while small molecule docking is routinely used in rational drug design efforts, docking peptides has proven challenging partly because docking scoring functions, developed and calibrated for small molecules, perform poorly for these molecules. Here, we present random forest classifiers trained to discriminate correctly docked peptides. We show that, for a testing set of 47 protein-peptide complexes, structurally dissimilar from the training set and previously used to benchmark AutoDock Vina's ability to dock short peptides, these random forest classifiers improve docking power from ∼25% for AutoDock scoring functions to an average of ∼70%. These results pave the way for peptide-docking success rates comparable to those of small molecule docking. To develop these classifiers, we compiled the ProptPep37_2021 data set, a curated, high-quality set of 322 crystallographic protein-peptides complexes annotated with structural similarity information. The data set also provides a collection of high-quality putative poses with a range of deviations from the crystallographic pose, providing correct and incorrect poses (i.e., decoys) of the peptide for each entry. The ProptPep37_2021 data set as well as the classifiers presented here are freely available.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34124893      PMCID: PMC8543977          DOI: 10.1021/acs.jcim.1c00573

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Inf Model        ISSN: 1549-9596            Impact factor:   6.162


  74 in total

1.  Using a beta-hairpin to mimic an alpha-helix: cyclic peptidomimetic inhibitors of the p53-HDM2 protein-protein interaction.

Authors:  Rudi Fasan; Ricardo L A Dias; Kerstin Moehle; Oliver Zerbe; Jan W Vrijbloed; Daniel Obrecht; John A Robinson
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2004-04-13       Impact factor: 15.336

2.  How significant is a protein structure similarity with TM-score = 0.5?

Authors:  Jinrui Xu; Yang Zhang
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-02-17       Impact factor: 6.937

Review 3.  Reaching for high-hanging fruit in drug discovery at protein-protein interfaces.

Authors:  James A Wells; Christopher L McClendon
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2007-12-13       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  A new peptide docking strategy using a mean field technique with mutually orthogonal Latin square sampling.

Authors:  P Arun Prasad; N Gautham
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2008-05-09       Impact factor: 3.686

5.  SFCscore: scoring functions for affinity prediction of protein-ligand complexes.

Authors:  Christoph A Sotriffer; Paul Sanschagrin; Hans Matter; Gerhard Klebe
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2008-11-01

6.  Learning from the ligand: using ligand-based features to improve binding affinity prediction.

Authors:  Fergus Boyles; Charlotte M Deane; Garrett M Morris
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2020-02-01       Impact factor: 6.937

7.  A ring-distortion strategy to construct stereochemically complex and structurally diverse compounds from natural products.

Authors:  Robert W Huigens; Karen C Morrison; Robert W Hicklin; Timothy A Flood; Michelle F Richter; Paul J Hergenrother
Journal:  Nat Chem       Date:  2013-01-20       Impact factor: 24.427

8.  Asparagine and glutamine: using hydrogen atom contacts in the choice of side-chain amide orientation.

Authors:  J M Word; S C Lovell; J S Richardson; D C Richardson
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1999-01-29       Impact factor: 5.469

9.  Structure-based design of an indolicidin peptide analogue with increased protease stability.

Authors:  Annett Rozek; Jon-Paul S Powers; Carol L Friedrich; Robert E W Hancock
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2003-12-09       Impact factor: 3.162

10.  Does a more precise chemical description of protein-ligand complexes lead to more accurate prediction of binding affinity?

Authors:  Pedro J Ballester; Adrian Schreyer; Tom L Blundell
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2014-02-20       Impact factor: 4.956

View more
  1 in total

1.  Application of CT-Based Radiomics in Discriminating Pancreatic Cystadenomas From Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors Using Machine Learning Methods.

Authors:  Xuejiao Han; Jing Yang; Jingwen Luo; Pengan Chen; Zilong Zhang; Aqu Alu; Yinan Xiao; Xuelei Ma
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-07-22       Impact factor: 6.244

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.