Literature DB >> 34120290

Can end-to-end anastomosis reduce the risks of anastomotic leak compared to side-to-end anastomosis? A comparative study of 518 consecutive patients undergoing laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for low- or mid-rectal cancer.

A Chierici1, A Frontali1, W Godefroy1, G Spiezio1, Y Panis2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: After laparoscopic total mesorectal excision (TME) for low or mid-rectal cancer, we observed several cases of anastomotic leakage (AL) in patients with side-to-end anastomosis (STE). Thus, from December 2018, we routinely performed end-to-end anastomosis (ETE). The aim of this study was to assess if this new strategy changed AL and chronic pelvic sepsis rates in our department.
METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted on all the patients who underwent a laparoscopic rectal resection with TME and sphincter-saving surgery for mid- and low-rectal adenocarcinoma from January 2006 to December 2019. A comparative study between STE and routine ETE was performed. The primary outcome was the assessment of postoperative AL rate. The secondary outcomes were: (a) overall morbidity rate; (c) severe morbidity rate defined by a Clavien-Dindo score > 3; (c) chronic leak rate.
RESULTS: Five hundred eighteen patients underwent TME: STE was performed in 394 cases (76%) and ETE in 124 but for the first 66 cases only if STE was impossible (i.e., too short colon, obese patients). AL rates for STE were 57/204 (23%) after stapled colorectal anastomosis (CRA) and 34/190 (18%) after manual coloanal anastomosis (CAA). Since December 2018, routine ETE was performed in 58 cases. The AL rate for routine ETE was 3/24 (12%) for CRA, and 2/34 (6%) for CAA: thus, The AL rate dropped from 23% (91/394) after STE to 9% (5/58) after routine ETE (p = 0.0005). After a mean follow-up of 43 months (6-156), incidence of chronic AL was 68/394 (17%) after STE and 15/117 (13%) after ETE (p = 0.32). In the group of ETE with chronic AL, 11 patients (73%) spontaneously healed and stoma reversal was possible, whereas this happened in only 20 patients (29%) after STE (p = 0.0025).
CONCLUSIONS: ETE seems to be associated with a significantly lower rate of AL and higher rate of spontaneous healing after chronic AL than STE.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anastomotic leakage; Rectal cancer; Surgery; Total mesorectal excision

Year:  2021        PMID: 34120290     DOI: 10.1007/s10151-021-02468-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tech Coloproctol        ISSN: 1123-6337            Impact factor:   3.781


  2 in total

1.  Two-Stage Turnbull-Cutait Pull-Through Coloanal Anastomosis for Low Rectal Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Sebastiano Biondo; Loris Trenti; Eloy Espin; Francesco Bianco; Oriana Barrios; Armando Falato; Silvia De Franciscis; Alejandro Solis; Esther Kreisler
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2020-08-19       Impact factor: 14.766

2.  Oncological Outcomes After Anastomotic Leakage After Surgery for Colon or Rectal Cancer: Increased Risk of Local Recurrence.

Authors:  Thomas W A Koedam; Boukje T Bootsma; Charlotte L Deijen; Tim van de Brug; Geert Kazemier; Miguel A Cuesta; Alois Fürst; Antonio M Lacy; Eva Haglind; Jurriaan B Tuynman; Freek Daams; Hendrik J Bonjer
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 12.969

  2 in total
  1 in total

Review 1.  Value of different anastomoses in laparoscopic radical right hemicolectomy for right-sided colon cancer: retrospective study and literature review.

Authors:  Xiaoming Wang; Hongyan Ni; Wangqiang Jia; Sen Wang; Yangyang Zhang; Peng Zhao; Long Yuan
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2022-09-29       Impact factor: 3.253

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.