Literature DB >> 32492131

Two-Stage Turnbull-Cutait Pull-Through Coloanal Anastomosis for Low Rectal Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Sebastiano Biondo1, Loris Trenti1, Eloy Espin2, Francesco Bianco3, Oriana Barrios1, Armando Falato4, Silvia De Franciscis5, Alejandro Solis2, Esther Kreisler1.   

Abstract

Importance: Two-stage Turnbull-Cutait pull-through hand-sewn coloanal anastomosis seems to provide benefits in terms of postoperative morbidity compared with standard hand-sewn coloanal anastomosis associated with diverting ileostomy and further ileostomy reversal in patients operated on for low rectal cancer. Objective: To compare 30-day postoperative and 1-year follow-up results of Turnbull-Cutait pull-through hand-sewn coloanal anastomosis and standard hand-sewn coloanal anastomosis after ultralow rectal resection for rectal cancer. Design, Setting, and Participants: Multicenter randomized clinical trial. Neither patients nor surgeons were blinded for technique. Patients were recruited in 3 centers, Bellvitge University Hospital and Valle d'Hebron University Hospital in Spain and Instituto Nazionale Tumori Fondazione G. Pascale-Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico in Italy. Patients undergoing ultralow anterior rectal resection needing hand-sewn coloanal anastomosis were randomly assigned to 2-stage Turnbull-Cutait pull-through hand-sewn coloanal anastomosis or standard hand-sewn coloanal anastomosis associated with diverting ileostomy. Data were analyzed between June 2012 and October 2018. Interventions: All patients underwent ultralow anterior resection. Patients assigned to the 2-stage Turnbull-Cutait pull-through group underwent exteriorization of a segment of left colon through the anal canal and, after 6 to 10 days, the exteriorized colon was resected and a delayed hand-sewn coloanal anastomosis was performed. For patients assigned to standard coloanal anastomosis, the hand-sewn coloanal anastomosis was performed with diverting ileostomy at first operation. Closure of the ileostomy was planned after 6 to 8 months. Main Outcomes and Measures: Primary outcome was 30-day postoperative morbidity. For the standard hand-sewn coloanal anastomosis with diverting ileostomy group, overall postoperative morbidity includes 30-day postoperative complications of the ileostomy closure.
Results: Ninety-two white patients, 72 men and 20 women, with a median age of 62 years, were randomized and included in the analysis. Forty-six patients received standard hand-sewn coloanal anastomosis with diverting ileostomy and 46 received the 2-stage pull-through hand-sewn coloanal anastomosis. Seven patients (15.2%) in the standard hand-sewn coloanal anastomosis group did not undergo reversal ileostomy, and 1 patient (2.2%) in the 2-stage pull-through hand-sewn coloanal anastomosis group did not undergo delayed coloanal anastomosis. The 30-day overall composite postoperative complications rate was similar between the 2 groups (34.8% in 2-stage pull-through hand-sewn coloanal anastomosis group vs 45.7% in standard hand-sewn coloanal anastomosis group; P = .40), with a difference of -10.9 (95% CI, -29.5 to 8.9). Conclusions and Relevance: The 2-stage pull-through hand-sewn coloanal anastomosis after ultralow anterior resection for low rectal cancer is safe and does not increase the postoperative morbidity rate compared with standard coloanal anastomosis with covering ileostomy followed by ileostomy closure. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01766661.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32492131      PMCID: PMC7270870          DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2020.1625

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Surg        ISSN: 2168-6254            Impact factor:   14.766


  8 in total

Review 1.  [Chronic anastomotic leak after low rectal resection-an unsolved problem?]

Authors:  Peter Kienle; Jörn Richard Magdeburg
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2021-04-14       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 2.  Surgical outcomes of Turnbull-Cutait delayed coloanal anastomosis with pull-through versus immediate coloanal anastomosis with diverting stoma after total mesorectal excision for low rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  C La Raja; C Foppa; A Maroli; C Kontovounisios; N Ben David; M Carvello; A Spinelli
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2022-03-28       Impact factor: 3.699

3.  A case of post-operative stenosis caused by colonic ischemia after low anterior resection for rectal cancer, followed by delayed colo-anal anastomosis.

Authors:  Shuichiro Uchiyama; Naotaka Ikeda; Tomohiro Oyama; Mayumi Eguchi; Ayaka Ito; Rikiya Sato; Ryoichi Toyosaki; Masaki Kitazono; Toyokuni Suenaga
Journal:  J Surg Case Rep       Date:  2022-05-18

4.  Can end-to-end anastomosis reduce the risks of anastomotic leak compared to side-to-end anastomosis? A comparative study of 518 consecutive patients undergoing laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for low- or mid-rectal cancer.

Authors:  A Chierici; A Frontali; W Godefroy; G Spiezio; Y Panis
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2021-06-13       Impact factor: 3.781

Review 5.  Surgical Treatment of Low-Lying Rectal Cancer: Updates.

Authors:  Cristopher Varela; Nam Kyu Kim
Journal:  Ann Coloproctol       Date:  2021-12-22

6.  Laparoscopic Proximally Extended Colorectal Resection With Two-Stage Turnbull-Cutait Pull-Through Coloanal Anastomosis for Late Complications of Chronic Radiation Proctopathy.

Authors:  Yanjiong He; Zuolin Zhou; Xiaoyan Huang; Qi Guan; Qiyuan Qin; Miaomiao Zhu; Huaiming Wang; Qinghua Zhong; Daici Chen; Hui Wang; Lekun Fang; Tenghui Ma
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-04-25

7.  Preliminary functional results after transanal irrigation in patients undergoing SHiP procedure for low rectal cancer.

Authors:  Francesco Bianco; Sebastiano Grassia; Marta Goglia; Gaetano Gallo
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2022-07-18

8.  Does oncological outcome differ between restorative and nonrestorative low anterior resection in patients with primary rectal cancer?

Authors:  Sapho X Roodbeen; Robin D Blok; Wernard A Borstlap; Willem A Bemelman; Roel Hompes; Pieter J Tanis
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2020-12-15       Impact factor: 3.788

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.