| Literature DB >> 34118937 |
Jin-Fang Song1, Jie Zhang2, Ming-Zhu Zhang3, Jiang Ni1, Tao Wang4, Yi-Qing Zhao5, Naveed Ullah Khan6.
Abstract
Genetic polymorphisms in the MTNR1B gene is associated with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM); however, there is no evidence about its impact on the therapeutic efficacy of nateglinide. This prospective case-control study was designed to investigate the effect of MTNR1B rs10830963 gene variant on the therapeutic efficacy of nateglinide in treating T2DM. We genotyped untreated T2DM patients (N = 200) and healthy controls (N = 200) using the method of the high resolution of melting curve (HRM). Newly diagnosed T2DM patients (n = 60) with CYP2C9*1 and SLCO1B1 521TT genotypes were enrolled and given oral nateglinide (360 mg/d) for 8 weeks. The outcome was measured by collecting the venous blood samples before and at the 8th week of the treatment. The risk G allelic frequency of MTNR1B rs10830963 was higher in T2DM patients than the healthy subjects (P < 0.05). Post 8-week of treatment, newly diagnosed T2DM patients showed a less reduction in fasting plasma glucose levels and less increase in the carriers of genotype CG + GG at rs10830963 when compared with the CC genotype (P < 0.05). MTNR1B rs10830963 polymorphism was associated with the therapeutic efficacy of nateglinide in T2DM patients. Also, the CC homozygotes had a better effect than G allele carriers.Trial registration Chinese Clinical Trial Register ChiCTR13003536, date of registration: May 14, 2013.Entities:
Keywords: Genetic variant; MTNR1B rs10830963; Nateglinide; Type 2 diabetes
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34118937 PMCID: PMC8196487 DOI: 10.1186/s12920-021-01004-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Med Genomics ISSN: 1755-8794 Impact factor: 3.063
Comparison of genotype and frequencies of MTNR1B rs10830963 polymorphism between T2DM patients and healthy subjects
| Genotypes | Healthy subjects (n = 200) | T2DM patients (n = 200) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| MTNR1B rs10830963 | |||
| CC | 82(41.00%) | 70(35.00%) | |
| CG | 98(49.00%) | 90(45.00%) | |
| GG | 20(10.00%) | 40(20.00%) | 0.019Δ* |
| C | 262(65.50%) | 230(57.50%) | |
| G | 138(34.50%) | 170(42.50%) | 0.020Δ* |
The allelic frequencies are indicated in absolute values (percentage). ΔP values are determined by the Pearson chi-square test. *P < 0.05
The baseline characteristics in T2DM patients with various MTNR1B rs10830963 genotypes before treatment with nateglinide (n = 200)
| Parameters | MTNR1B rs10830963 genotype | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CC | CG | GG | ||
| N (men/women) | 70(40/30) | 90(48/42) | 40(23/17) | 0.850Δ |
| Age (years) | 47.81 ± 10.82 | 48.01 ± 12.04 | 47.09 ± 13.92 | 0.921 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 26.41 ± 3.24 | 25.43 ± 3.31 | 26.59 ± 4.11 | 0.104 |
| WHR | 0.92 ± 0.06 | 0.91 ± 0.06 | 0.92 ± 0.08 | 0.552# |
| FPG (mmol/L) | 9.61 ± 2.01 | 9.91 ± 2.79 | 10.82 ± 1.79 | 0.034* |
| PPG (mmol/L) | 15.36 ± 2.46 | 14.21 ± 4.39 | 14.69 ± 5.71 | 0.224 |
| FINS (mU/L) | 8.56 ± 5.39 | 7.37 ± 6.99 | 7.53 ± 6.39 | 0.477# |
| PINS (mU/L) | 30.01 ± 17.10 | 28.11 ± 20.51 | 33.51 ± 17.49 | 0.320 |
| HOMA-IR | 3.27 ± 1.30 | 3.09 ± 3.21 | 4.01 ± 2.47 | 0.160 |
| HbA1c (%) | 9.71 ± 1.97 | 9.11 ± 2.62 | 9.95 ± 2.04 | 0.098 |
| TG (mmol/L) | 2.25 ± 1.38 | 2.31 ± 2.13 | 1.97 ± 1.52 | 0.596 |
| TC (mmol/L) | 5.21 ± 1.29 | 4.99 ± 1.31 | 5.49 ± 1.51 | 0.143 |
| HDL-c (mmol/L) | 1.28 ± 0.95 | 1.33 ± 0.59 | 1.41 ± 0.29 | 0.645 |
| LDL-c (mmol/L) | 3.45 ± 0.68 | 3.61 ± 1.19 | 3.80 ± 0.93 | 0.199# |
BMI body mass index, WHR waist to hip ratio, FPG fasting plasma glucose, PPG postprandial plasma glucose, FINS fasting serum insulin, PINS postprandial serum insulin, HOMA-IR homeostasis model assessment for insulin resistance, HbA hemoglobin A1c, TG triglyceride, TC total cholesterol, HDL-c high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol, LDL-c low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol
Data are given as (mean ± SD). P values represent statistical differences among the three different genotypes by the one-way ANOVA. ΔP values are determined by the Pearson chi-square test. #P values are determined by the Kruskal–Wallis test. *P < 0.05
Fig. 1Baseline levels of FPG in T2DM patients with different MTNR1B rs10830963 genotypes. Data are expressed as (mean ± SD). *P < 0.05 compared with CC genotype group
Clinical characteristics of T2DM patients before and after nateglinide treatment (n = 60)
| Parameters | Before treatment n = 60 | After treatment n = 60 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMI (kg/m2) | 25.41 ± 3.54 | 25.33 ± 3.11 | 0.896 |
| WHR | 0.92 ± 0.06 | 0.91 ± 0.06 | 0.363 |
| FPG (mmol/L) | 10.41 ± 1.23 | 7.25 ± 1.21 | 0.000* |
| PPG (mmol/L) | 14.56 ± 2.76 | 9.38 ± 2.61 | 0.000* |
| FINS (mU/L) | 7.56 ± 4.39 | 9.51 ± 3.46 | 0.008* |
| PINS (mU/L) | 30.31 ± 17.10 | 47.21 ± 15.16 | 0.000* |
| HOMA-IR | 3.57 ± 1.30 | 2.72 ± 1.41 | 0.001* |
| HOMA-β | 25.73 ± 14.5 | 60.32 ± 21.15 | 0.000* |
| HbA1c (%) | 9.31 ± 1.87 | 7.89 ± 0.81 | 0.000* |
| TG (mmol/L) | 2.25 ± 1.38 | 1.86 ± 1.23 | 0.105 |
| TC (mmol/L) | 5.21 ± 1.29 | 4.31 ± 1.09 | 0.000* |
| HDL-c (mmol/L) | 1.38 ± 0.75 | 1.45 ± 0.59 | 0.571 |
| LDL-c (mmol/L) | 3.85 ± 1.78 | 3.42 ± 1.07 | 0.111 |
BMI body mass index, WHR waist to hip ratio, FPG fasting plasma glucose, PPG postprandial plasma glucose, FINS fasting serum insulin, PINS postprandial serum insulin, HOMA-IR homeostasis model assessment for insulin resistance, HOMA-β Homeostasis model assessment for islet β cell function, HbA1c hemoglobin A1c, TG triglyceride, TC total cholesterol, HDL-c high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol, LDL-c low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol
Data are expressed as (mean ± SD). P values are determined by the paired Student’s t test. *P < 0.05
Effects of different MTNR1B rs10830963 genotypes in T2DM patients on clinical traits determined before and after nateglinide treatment
| Parameters | CC(n = 26) | CG(n = 26) + GG(n = 8) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| N (male/female) | 26 (16/10) | 34(20/14) | 0.902Δ |
| FPG (mmol/L) | |||
| Before | 10.73 ± 2.05 | 10.81 ± 1.92 | 0.877 |
| After | 6.98 ± 1.35 | 7.94 ± 1.23 | 0.006* |
| DV | − 3.75 ± 1.68 | − 2.87 ± 1.32 | 0.027* |
| PPG (mmol/L) | |||
| Before | 14.51 ± 4.31 | 13.04 ± 4.72 | 0.220 |
| After | 9.34 ± 3.24 | 9.27 ± 3.49 | 0.937 |
| DV | − 5.17 ± 4.08 | − 3.77 ± 3.19 | 0.141# |
| FINS (mU/L) | |||
| Before | 8.82 ± 6.81 | 7.80 ± 4.20 | 0.478 |
| After | 10.18 ± 6.60 | 9.32 ± 3.64 | 0.522 |
| DV | 1.36 ± 4.10 | 1.84 ± 3.80 | 0.641 |
| PINS (mU/L) | |||
| Before | 31.42 ± 20.47 | 27.47 ± 16.43 | 0.410 |
| After | 48.41 ± 19.78 | 37.13 ± 20.87 | 0.038* |
| DV | 16.99 ± 17.82 | 9.66 ± 19.37 | 0.138 |
| HOMA-IR | |||
| Before | 4.48 ± 2.88 | 3.24 ± 1.73 | 0.066 |
| After | 3.39 ± 2.12 | 2.43 ± 1.18 | 0.072 |
| DV | − 0.89 ± 1.93 | − 0.79 ± 1.31 | 0.704 |
| HOMA-β | |||
| Before | 27.75 ± 16.03 | 24.08 ± 17.32 | 0.405 |
| After | 68.62 ± 45.21 | 49.21 ± 24.36 | 0.037* |
| DV | 40.87 ± 23.52 | 25.13 ± 19.21 | 0.006* |
| HbA1c (%) | |||
| Before | 9.79 ± 1.86 | 9.15 ± 2.26 | 0.246# |
| After | 7.00 ± 0.84 | 7.01 ± 1.05 | 0.968 |
| DV | − 2.79 ± 1.53 | − 2.14 ± 1.74 | 0.137 |
| TG (mmol/L) | |||
| Before | 2.46 ± 1.96 | 2.31 ± 1.90 | 0.766 |
| After | 2.21 ± 1.91 | 1.79 ± 1.23 | 0.306 |
| DV | − 0.25 ± 1.95 | − 0.52 ± 1.58 | 0.096# |
| TC (mmol/L) | |||
| Before | 5.27 ± 1.69 | 5.22 ± 1.15 | 0.892# |
| After | 4.84 ± 1.12 | 4.89 ± 1.37 | 0.880# |
| DV | − 0.43 ± 1.53 | − 0.33 ± 1.09 | 0.769# |
| HDL-c (mmol/L) | |||
| Before | 1.42 ± 0.51 | 1.47 ± 0.47 | 0.695# |
| After | 1.35 ± 0.55 | 1.43 ± 0.51 | 0.563# |
| DV | − 0.07 ± 0.68 | − 0.04 ± 0.46 | 0.839 |
| LDL-c (mmol/L) | |||
| Before | 3.28 ± 1.19 | 3.18 ± 1.05 | 0.731# |
| After | 3.19 ± 1.20 | 3.11 ± 1.07 | 0.786 |
| DV | − 0.09 ± 1.26 | − 0.07 ± 1.08 | 0.948 |
BMI body mass index, WHR waist to hip ratio, FPG fasting plasma glucose, PPG postprandial plasma glucose, FINS fasting serum insulin, PINS postprandial serum insulin, HOMA-IR homeostasis model assessment for insulin resistance, HOMA-β Homeostasis model assessment for islet β cell function, HbA1c hemoglobin A1c, TG triglyceride, TC total cholesterol, HDL-c high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol, LDL-c low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol, DV differential values (post-administration minus pre-administration)
Data are given as (mean ± SD). ΔP values are determined by the Pearson chi-square test. #P values are determined by the Kruskal–Wallis test. *P < 0.05
Fig. 2Comparisons of differential values (pre-administration levels subtracted from the post-administration levels) of FPG (A) and HOMA-β (B) between different MTNR1B rs10830963 genotypes in T2DM patients before and after treatment of nateglinide. Data are expressed as (mean ± SD). *P < 0.05 compared with CC genotype group respectively