| Literature DB >> 20398260 |
Chen Liu1, Ying Wu, Huaixing Li, Qibin Qi, Claudia Langenberg, Ruth J F Loos, Xu Lin.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) in White Europeans have shown that genetic variation rs10830963 in melatonin receptor 1B gene (MTNR1B) is associated with fasting glucose and type 2 diabetes, which has also been replicated in several Asian populations. As a variant in the gene involved in the regulation of circadian rhythms, the effect of the variant on sleep status remains unknown. This study aimed to investigate the effects of MTNR1B rs10830963 on fasting glucose, type 2 diabetes and sleep status in Chinese Hans.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2010 PMID: 20398260 PMCID: PMC2873324 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2350-11-59
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Med Genet ISSN: 1471-2350 Impact factor: 2.103
Characteristics of the study population
| Beijing | Shanghai | Total population | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N (%male) | 1574 (45.2) | 1636 (43.5) | 3210 (44.3) | |
| Age (years) | 58.3 ± 5.9 | 58.9 ± 6.0 | 58.6 ± 6.0 | 0.0095 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 25.1 (22.8-27.4) | 23.5 (21.3-25.9) | 24.2 (22.0-26.6) | < 0.0001 |
| Current smoker (%) | 499 (31.7) | 403 (24.7) | 902 (28.1) | < 0.0001 |
| Current drinker (%) | 584 (37.1) | 327 (20.0) | 911 (28.4) | < 0.0001 |
| Physical activity, (MET-h/wk) | 49.1 (23.1-76.4) | 39.6 (23.1-65.5) | 46.2 (23.1-69.3) | < 0.0001 |
| Sleep duration, hour | 8.0 (7.0-8.5) | 7.5 (6.5-8.0) | 8.0 (7.0-8.0) | < 0.0001 |
| Self-reported sleep disorder (%) | 362 (22.97) | 251 (15.36) | 613 (19.10) | < 0.0001 |
| Fasting glucose (mmol/l) | 6.16 ± 1.96 | 5.53 ± 1.42 | 5.84 ± 1.74 | < 0.0001 |
| HbA1C (%) | 6.08 ± 1.22 | 5.90 ± 0.96 | 5.99 ± 1.10 | < 0.0001 |
| HOMA-B (%) | 100.1 ± 44.9 | 120.0 ± 46.9 | 110.3 ± 47.0 | < 0.0001 |
| HOMA-S (%) | 64.0 (47.3-89.5) | 63.5 (46.9-85.1) | 63.7 (47.1-86.9) | 0.05 |
| Diabetes (%) | 272 (17.3) | 152 (9.3) | 424 (13.2) | < 0.0001 |
| Obesity (%) | 320 (20.3) | 154 (9.4) | 474 (14.8) | < 0.0001 |
| Hypertension (%) | 978 (62.1) | 803 (49.1) | 1781 (55.5) | < 0.0001 |
Data are mean ± SD, median (inter-quartile range) or n (%). P represents significance of the differences between Beijing and Shanghai subpopulations.
Associations of rs10830963 with fasting glucose, HbA1C, HOMA-B and HOMA-S.
| Beijing (1389) | Shanghai (1497) | Total population (2886) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| beta (SE) | beta (SE) | beta (SE) | SNP × Region | SNP × Sleep duration | SNP × Sleep disorder | ||||
| Glucose(mmol/l) | |||||||||
| Model 1 | -0.03 (0.06) | 0.59 | 0.11 (0.04) | 0.005 | 0.04 (0.07) | 0.51 | 0.05 | 0.35 | 0.48 |
| Model 2 | -0.03 (0.05) | 0.58 | 0.11 (0.04) | 0.005 | 0.04 (0.07) | 0.52 | |||
| Model 3 | -0.03 (0.06) | 0.59 | 0.11 (0.04) | 0.005 | 0.04 (0.07) | 0.51 | |||
| HbA1C (%) | |||||||||
| Model 1 | -0.003 (0.04) | 0.93 | 0.07 (0.02) | 0.004 | 0.04 (0.04) | 0.30 | 0.09 | 0.52 | 0.22 |
| Model 2 | -0.004 (0.04) | 0.92 | 0.07 (0.03) | 0.004 | 0.04 (0.04) | 0.31 | |||
| Model 3 | -0.004 (0.04) | 0.93 | 0.07 (0.03) | 0.004 | 0.04 (0.04) | 0.30 | |||
| HOMA-B (%) | |||||||||
| Model 1 | 0.88 (1.58) | 0.58 | -5.01 (1.65) | 0.003 | -2.04 (2.94) | 0.49 | 0.01 | 0.75 | 0.34 |
| Model 2 | 0.91 (1.57) | 0.56 | -5.01 (1.65) | 0.003 | -2.02 (2.96) | 0.49 | |||
| Model 3 | 0.88 (1.58) | 0.58 | -5.01 (1.65) | 0.003 | -2.04 (2.94) | 0.49 | |||
| Log-transformed | HOMA-S (%) | ||||||||
| Model 1 | -0.004 (0.02) | 0.82 | 0.008 (0.02) | 0.66 | 0.002 (0.01) | 0.86 | 0.65 | 0.31 | 0.73 |
| Model 2 | -0.005 (0.02) | 0.82 | 0.008 (0.02) | 0.66 | 0.002 (0.01) | 0.86 | |||
| Model 3 | -0.004 (0.02) | 0.82 | 0.008 (0.02) | 0.66 | 0.002 (0.01) | 0.86 | |||
Participants previously diagnosed with type 2 diabetes or receiving glucose-lowering treatment (n = 264) were excluded from the analyses. HOMA-S values were log-transformed before analyses. P values and beta (SE) for Beijing and Shanghai subpopulations were calculated using linear regression model assuming an additive model. The combined P values and beta (SE) were calculated in meta-analyses using random model.
Model 1: Adjusted for age, sex and BMI.
Model 2: Adjusted variables in model 1 plus sleep duration.
Model 3: Adjusted variables in model 1 plus self-reported sleep disorder.
P values for interaction were tested in linear regression model using terms of SNP × Region (Beijing/Shanghai), SNP × Sleep duration or SNP × Sleep disorder.
Figure 1Association of rs10830963 with fasting glucose under an additive model using meta-analyses. The data in Asian populations are from the studies in Chinese (Chinese Hans from SH 1 [13], Chinese Hans from SH2 and BJ in this population), Japanese [12] and Sri Lankan [12], and data in Europeans are from studies of CoLaus [7], deCODE [7], DGI [7], Framingham [7], FUSION [7], NFBC1966 [7], NTR/NESDA [7], Rotterdam [7], Sardinia [7], TwinUK [7], DESIR [11], Haguenau [11], Inter99 [11], NFBC86 [11], Botnia PPP [5], Botnia prospective [5], Helsinki Birth Cohort [5], METSIM [5], New Hoorn Study [10] and RISC [9]. The black circles and horizontal lines represent the point estimated beta and 95% CI for of each study, respectively. The overall 95% CI for the meta-analyses is represented by diamond. SH, Shanghai; BJ, Beijing.
Association of rs10830963 with sleep status
| Beijing | Shanghai | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CC | CG | GG | CC | CG | GG | |||
| N (%male)a | 539 (46.9) | 747 (45.0) | 265 (42.3) | 0.45 | 500 (44.6) | 807 (42.4) | 292 (45.2) | 0.61 |
| Age (years)b | 58.5 (6.0) | 58.2 (5.8) | 58.5 (6.1) | 0.55 | 58.8 (6.2) | 58.8 (5.9) | 59.3 (6.1) | 0.49 |
| BMI (kg/m2)b | 25.4 (3.7) | 25.2 (3.6) | 25.0 (3.7) | 0.36 | 23.7 (3.3) | 23.5 (3.3) | 23.8 (3.3) | 0.51 |
| Sleep duration (hour)c | 8.0 (7.0-8.3) | 8.0 (7.0-8.5) | 8.0 (7.0-8.0) | 0.95 | 7.5 (6.5-8.0) | 7.5 (6.0-8.0) | 7.8 (6.5-8.0) | 0.44 |
| Siesta frequency (%)a | ||||||||
| Never | 157 (29.1) | 192 (25.7) | 73 (27.6) | 0.92 | 262 (52.4) | 402 (49.8) | 155 (53.1) | 0.81 |
| Occasional | 87 (16.1) | 122 (16.3) | 43 (16.2) | 92 (18.4) | 171 (21.2) | 54 (18.5) | ||
| Regularly during summer | 63 (11.7) | 96 (12.9) | 32 (12.1) | 62 (12.4) | 102 (12.6) | 40 (13.7) | ||
| Regularly during the year | 232 (43.1) | 337 (45.1) | 117 (44.1) | 84 (16.8) | 132 (16.4) | 43 (14.7) | ||
| Self-reported sleep disorder (%)a | 127 (23.6) | 164 (22.0) | 67 (25.3) | 0.50 | 77 (15.4) | 126 (15.6) | 42 (17.1) | 0.88 |
| Per-allele effect on self-reported sleep disorder (OR [95% CI])d | 1.00 (0.85-1.19) | 0.96 | 0.97 (0.79-1.18) | 0.75 | ||||
Data are mean ± SD, median (inter-quartile range), n (%), or odd ratio (95%CI).
P values were calculated using χ2 test a, linear regression model b, Kruskal-Wallis test c, or logistic regression model under an additive model adjusting for age, sex and BMI.