| Literature DB >> 34116931 |
Abibatou Sall1, Moussa Seck2, Seynabou Fall2, Fatimata Bintou Sall2, Blaise Félix Faye2, Fatou Samba Ndiaye2, Macoura Gadji2, Saliou Diop2, Awa Oumar Touré2, Martine Raphaël3.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the relevance of using the smudge cell percentage in the blood smear as a prognostic marker in CLL.Entities:
Keywords: Blood smear; CLL; Prognostic marker; Senegal; Smudge cells
Year: 2021 PMID: 34116931 PMCID: PMC8885397 DOI: 10.1016/j.htct.2021.04.002
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Hematol Transfus Cell Ther ISSN: 2531-1379
Figure 1Blood smears of different CLL patients (x 100). A and B: different forms of SC (red arrows). C: SC with disrupted nuclear membrane (yellow arrows). D: Blood smear without SC.
* represent the degree of significance. *: p = 0.01, **: p = 0.001, ***: p = 0.0001.Ns = not significant.
Patient characteristics.
| Patient | Gender | Age (years) | Tumor syndrome | Lymphocytes 109/L | Smudge cells (%) | Binet Stage | CD38 Expression | Del13 q ( | Del11q ( | Trisomy 12 ( | Del17p ( | IGVH mutational Status ( |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | F | 63 | Absence | 33.62 | 48 | - | - | - | - | |||
| 2 | F | 50 | P | 298.80 | 11 | C | + | - | - | Presence | - | UM |
| 3 | M | 68 | P | 52.25 | 26 | C | + | Presence | - | - | - | UM |
| 4 | M | 53 | P | 831.14 | 12 | B | + | Presence | Presence | - | - | UM |
| 5 | M | 54 | P | 225.50 | 8 | C | Presence | - | - | - | UM | |
| 6 | M | 69 | P | 199.50 | 8 | B | + | Presence | - | - | - | UM |
| 7 | M | 80 | P | 49.64 | 55 | - | - | - | - | |||
| 8 | M | 63 | P | 230.00 | 21 | C | + | - | - | Presence | Presence | UM |
| 9 | M | 50 | P | 58.00 | 32 | C | + | - | Presence | - | - | UM |
| 10 | M | 51 | P | 88.55 | 14.5 | C | + | Presence | - | - | - | UM |
| 11 | M | 63 | P | 145.78 | 14.5 | B | - | - | - | Presence | UM | |
| 12 | M | 59 | P | 42.60 | 31 | C | + | Presence | - | Presence | - | UM |
| 13 | M | 67 | Absence | 6.48 | 80 | - | - | - | - | |||
| 14 | F | 67 | Absence | 42 | + | Presence | - | - | - | UM | ||
| 15 | M | 70 | P | 491.40 | 11 | B | + | Presence | - | Presence | Presence | UM |
| 16 | F | 57 | P | 12.80 | 39 | C | + | - | - | - | - | |
| 17 | F | 80 | P | 91.40 | 20 | C | + | Presence | - | Presence | - | UM |
| 18 | M | 60 | P | 82.30 | 27 | C | + | - | - | Presence | - | UM |
| 19 | M | 85 | P | 219.00 | 19 | C | + | Presence | - | - | Presence | UM |
| 20 | M | 54 | P | 87.80 | 43 | - | - | - | - | UM | ||
| 21 | M | 60 | P | 16.38 | 17 | C | + | Presence | Presence | - | - | UM |
| 22 | M | 63 | P | 789.20 | 12 | C | Presence | - | - | - | UM | |
| 23 | M | 54 | Absence | 51.76 | 31 | C | + | Presence | - | - | - | |
| 24 | M | 67 | P | 201.52 | 19 | B | + | Presence | - | Presence | - | UM |
| 25 | M | 60 | P | 171.00 | 10 | C | + | Presence | Presence | - | - | |
| 26 | M | 72 | P | 15.00 | 41 | C | - | - | - | - | ||
| 27 | M | 58 | P | 7.10 | 37 | - | - | - | - | |||
| 28 | M | 73 | P | 241.00 | 13 | B | + | Presence | - | Presence | - | |
| 29 | M | 74 | P | 12.70 | 39 | C | - | - | - | - | ||
| 30 | M | 63 | P | 734.00 | 21 | C | - | Presence | - | - | ||
| 31 | M | 68 | Absence | 5.20 | 31 | B | ||||||
| 32 | M | 48 | P | 165.93 | 19 | C | + | |||||
| 33 | M | 60 | P | 85.50 | 16.5 | C | + | |||||
| 34 | M | 52 | P | 156.30 | 14 | C | + | |||||
| 35 | F | 48 | P | 365.80 | 11 | C | + | |||||
| 36 | F | 78 | P | 311.00 | 15 | B | + | |||||
| 37 | F | 54 | Absence | 17.20 | 35 | B | + | |||||
| 38 | M | 82 | P | 150.90 | 12 | |||||||
| 39 | F | 64 | P | 10 | C | + | ||||||
| 40 | M | 55 | P | 114.42 | 15 | C | + | |||||
| 41 | F | 67 | P | 191.00 | 18 | C | + | |||||
| 42 | F | 70 | P | 79.20 | 29 | C | + |
F: female; M: male; P: presence; M: mutated; UM: unmutated; IGVH: immunoglobulin heavy chain.
Figure 2A: Simple linear regression between SC percentage and lymphocytes count. B: Percentage of SC in Binet stage A and Binet stages B/C. C: SC percentage depending on CD38 expression. D: SC percentage regarding the presence or absence of 13q deletion. E: SC percentage in patients with at least one C.A (Trisomy 12 and/or del 11q and/or del 17p). F: SC percentage in patients with unmutated or mutated IGVH status. G: Correlation between SC percentage and age. H: SC percentage depending on gender.
Figure 3Kaplan-Meier survival curves of 42 CLL patients, regarding the SC percentage.