| Literature DB >> 26712879 |
Teresa Amato1, Francesco Abate2, Pierpaolo Piccaluga3, Michele Iacono4, Chiara Fallerini1, Alessandra Renieri1, Giulia De Falco1, Maria Raffaella Ambrosio1, Vaselious Mourmouras1, Martin Ogwang5, Valeria Calbi5, Roul Rabadan2, Michael Hummel6, Stefano Pileri3, Lorenzo Leoncini7, Cristiana Bellan1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Recent studies using next-generation sequencing (NGS) analysis disclosed the importance of the intrinsic activation of the B-cell receptor (BCR) pathway in the pathogenesis of sporadic Burkitt lymphoma (sBL) due to mutations of TCF3/ID3 genes. Since no definitive data are available on the genetic landscape of endemic Burkitt (eBL), we first assessed the mutation frequency of TCF3/ID3 in eBL compared with sBL and subsequently the somatic hypermutation status of the BCR to answer whether an extrinsic activation of BCR signaling could also be demonstrated in Burkitt lymphoma.Entities:
Keywords: BCR; Burkitt lymphoma; Clonality analysis; NGS
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26712879 PMCID: PMC4778259 DOI: 10.1093/ajcp/aqv011
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Am J Clin Pathol ISSN: 0002-9173 Impact factor: 2.493
Clinical-Epidemiologic Characteristics of Burkitt Lymphoma Cases
| Case No. | Site | Age, y | Sex | EBV |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| eBL78 | Abdomen | 6 | M | + |
| eBL48 | Jaw | 10 | M | + |
| eBL43 | Gum | 5 | M | + |
| eBL15 | Lymph node | 9 | F | + |
| eBL32 | Jaw | 7 months | M | + |
| eBL35 | Jaw | 7 | M | + |
| eBL36 | Abdomen | 4 | M | + |
| eBL84 | Jaw | 9 | F | + |
| eBL52 | Jaw | 7 | M | + |
| eBL22 | Jaw | 6 | M | + |
| eBL49 | Jaw | 7 | M | + |
| eBL34 | Jaw | 10 | F | + |
| eBL51 | Jaw | 9 | M | + |
| eBL23 | Jaw | 7 | M | + |
| eBL19 | Abdomen | 4 | M | + |
| eBL40 | Jaw | 7 | M | + |
| eBL63 | Abdomen | 7 | F | + |
| eBL80 | Gum | 7 | M | + |
| eBL74 | Abdomen | 5 | M | + |
| eBL28 | Gum | 10 | M | + |
| eBL50 | Abdomen | 8 | F | + |
| eBL69 | Jaw | 8 | F | + |
| eBL31 | Palate | 7 | M | + |
| eBL20 | Jaw | 7 | M | + |
| eBL57 | Palate | 10 | F | + |
| eBL62 | Jaw | 9 | M | + |
| sBL4169 | Lymph node | 39 | M | – |
| sBLE9 | Abdomen | 21 | M | – |
| sBL4452 | Lymph node | 46 | M | – |
| sBLE4 | Abdomen | 53 | M | – |
| sBL4324 | Abdomen | 52 | F | – |
| sBLE2 | Lymph node | 31 | F | – |
| sBLE3 | Lymph node | 43 | F | – |
| sBLE5 | Abdomen | 40 | M | – |
| sBL2552 | Abdomen | 28 | M | + |
| sBL8274 | Abdomen | 23 | F | – |
| sBLE8 | Abdomen | 33 | M | – |
eBL, endemic Burkitt lymphoma; sBL, sporadic Burkitt lymphoma; +, positive; –, negative.
Modified FR1 BIOMED-2 Primersa
NGS, next-generation sequencing.
Forward and reverse primers are in blue, key sequences are in orange and yellow, and Multiplex Identifier (MID) sequences in green.
ID3 and TCF3 Single-Nucleotide Variants in eBL
| Sample ID | Position | Reference/Variant | Chromosome | Symbol | Amino Acid Change | Type of Mutation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| eBL23 | NM_002167:702 | C/G | chr1:23885621 | I99M | Missense | |
| NM_002167:650 | T/C | chr1:23885673 | V82A | Missense | ||
| NM_002167:649 | G/A | chr1:23885674 | V82I | Missense | ||
| NM_002167:700 | A/C | chr1:23885623 | I99L | Missense | ||
| eBL49 | NM_002167:595 | C/T | chr1:23885728 | L64F | Missense | |
| NM_002167:571 | C/T | chr1:23885752 | P56S | Missense | ||
| eBL50 | NM_002167:616 | C/T | chr1:23885707 | Q71 | Nonsense | |
| NM_002167:592 | C/T | chr1:23885731 | Q63 | Nonsense | ||
| eBL22 | NM_002167:595 | C/T | chr1:23885728 | L64F | Missense | |
| eBL69 | NM_002167:430 | G/A | chr1:23885893 | G9S | Missense | |
| eBL80 | NM_002167:515 | C/T | chr1:23885808 | P37L | Missense | |
| eBL19 | NM_001136139:1692 | T/A | chr19:1612366 | N551K | Missense | |
| eBL20 | NM_001136139:1692 | T/G | chr19:1612366 | N551K | Missense | |
| eBL23 | NM_001136139:1709 | T/A | chr19:1612349 | V557E | Missense |
eBL, endemic Burkitt lymphoma.
Figure 1ID3 and/or TCF3 mutations in endemic Burkitt lymphoma (eBL) and sporadic Burkitt lymphoma (sBL). The number and percentage of eBL and sBL cases with ID3 and/or TCF3 mutations are as follows: eight (30%) of 18 for eBL and eight (64%) of 11 for sBL. Example of biallelic mutation in the TCF3 (A) and ID3 (B) genes identified in sBL by Sanger sequencing. C, TCF3 and ID3 wild-type sequences (top row and bottom row, respectively).
NGS and Sanger Sequencing Analysis of IgV Genes in Burkitt Lymphoma
| Case No. | VH Usage | No. of Clusters | Range, Mean (%) | R/S | VD-D/VS-S | In/Out Frame | Intraclonal Heterogeneity | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NGS | Sanger | |||||||
| eBL48 | 1-2*04 | 6 | 2 | 17-20 (90.58-92.24) | 12/7 | 9/3 | 6/0 | Yes |
| eBL43 | 1-3*01 | 4 | 1 | 28-35 (87.85-90.27) | 27/8 | 23/4 | 4/0 | Yes |
| eBL78 | 1-69*06 | 4 | 2 | 9-12 (95.83-96-87) | 6/6 | 5/1 | 4/0 | Yes |
| eBL15 | 1-69*05 | 6 | 3 | 15-19 (91.67-92.87) | 7/12 | 1/6 | 4/0 | Yes |
| eBL32 | 1-69*04 | 5 | 2 | 18-19 (93.15-93.61) | 13/6 | 10/3 | 5/0 | Yes |
| eBL35 | 1-69*10 | 4 | 1 | 23-28 (85.21-87.95) | 21/7 | 11/10 | 4/0 | Yes |
| eBL36 | 1-69*06 | 6 | 2 | 5-6 (97.26-97.76) | 4/2 | 4/0 | 6/0 | Yes |
| eBL84 | 1-69*04 | 5 | 3 | 39-42 (79.81-81.28) | 30/10 | 21/9 | 5/0 | Yes |
| eBL52 | 1-69*06 | 7 | 3 | 20-27 (90.62-93.05) | 21/6 | 14/7 | 3/0 | Yes |
| eBL22 | 1-8*02 | 4 | 1 | 20-24 (91.67-92.53) | 14/10 | 12/2 | 4/0 | Yes |
| eBL49 | 3-7*01 | 5 | 2 | 15-21 (92.71-94.79) | 14/7 | 12/2 | 5/0 | Yes |
| eBL34 | 3-9*01 | 3 | 1 | 24-29 (87.34-89.24) | 19/10 | 9/9 | 5/0 | Yes |
| eBL51 | 3-11*01 | 3 | 1 | 12-15 (93.27-94.61) | 13/2 | 8/4 | 3/0 | Yes |
| eBL23 | 3-15*01 | 8 | 5 | 22-33 (86.66-93.33) | 17/6 | 9/5 | 5/0 | Yes |
| eBL19 | 3-23*01 | 10 | 4 | 5-13 (95.20-95.65) | 11/2 | 10/1 | 3/0 | Yes |
| eBL40 | 3-23*01 | 5 | 2 | 32-39 (86.48-88.88) | 26/13 | 18/8 | 5/0 | Yes |
| eBL63 | 3-23*01 | 3 | 2 | 14-16 (93.57-94.37) | 14/1 | 12/2 | 3/0 | Yes |
| eBL80 | 3-23*01 | 4 | 1 | 11-13 (93.98-95.58) | 9/4 | 8/1 | 4/0 | Yes |
| eBL74 | 3-23*01 | 4 | 1 | 19-20 (93.06-93.40) | 18/2 | 8/10 | 4/0 | Yes |
| eBL28 | 3-30*03 | 7 | 3 | 17-26 (89.60-93.15) | 20/6 | 10/8 | 7/0 | Yes |
| eBL50 | 3-72*01 | 4 | 2 | 10-13 (91.37-92.80) | 10/3 | 9/1 | 4/0 | Yes |
| eBL69 | 3-74*01 | 4 | 2 | 18-26 (90.97-93.75) | 17/9 | 8/10 | 4/0 | Yes |
| eBL31 | 4-34*01 | 9 | 5 | 5-14 (84.15-94.79) | 9/5 | 5/3 | 5/0 | Yes |
| eBL21 | 4-34*01 | 7 | 3 | 14-15 (93.18-93.64) | 10/5 | 6/3 | 5/0 | Yes |
| eBL57 | 4-34*01 | 4 | 1 | 38-42 (80.91-82.72) | 35/7 | 28/7 | 3/0 | Yes |
| eBL62 | 4-34*01 | 5 | 2 | 26-30 (87.76-89.43) | 20/10 | 14/6 | 2/1 | Yes |
| sBL4169 | 1-3*01 | 2 | 1 | 8-9 (95.43-95.89) | 9/1 | 5/0 | 3/0 | Yes |
| sBLE9 | 3-7*01 | 1 | 1 | 8 (94.84) | 8/0 | 4/4 | 1/0 | No |
| sBL4452 | 3-13*01 | 1 | 1 | 7 (96.82) | 5/2 | 3/1 | 1/0 | No |
| sBLE4 | 3-21*01 | 1 | 1 | 8 (94.94) | 6/2 | 3/3 | 2/0 | No |
| sBL4324 | 3-23*01 | 1 | 1 | 4 (98.21) | 4/1 | 2/1 | 1/0 | No |
| sBLE2 | 3-23*01 | 1 | 1 | 11 (93.04) | 9/1 | 7/2 | 1/0 | No |
| sBLE3 | 3-23*01 | 1 | 1 | 9 (94.23) | 8/1 | 6/2 | 1/0 | No |
| sBLE5 | 3-23*01 | 1 | 1 | 3 (98.10) | 4/0 | 2/1 | 1/0 | No |
| sBL2552 | 3-74*01 | 2 | 1 | 18-19 (90.88-91.93) | 16/5 | 12/5 | 2/0 | Yes |
| sBL8274 | 4-39*01 | 2 | 2 | 13-16 (93.81-94.25) | 9/5 | 3/5 | 2/0 | Yes |
| sBLE8 | 4-39*01 | 1 | 1 | 4 (97.42) | 4/0 | 3/1 | 1/0 | No |
eBL, endemic Burkitt lymphoma; NGS, next-generation sequencing; R/S, total replacement to silent mutation ratio; sBL, sporadic Burkitt lymphoma;
VD-D, very dissimilar/dissimilar: (– – –) o (+ – –) o (– + –) o (– – +); VS-S, very similar/similar: ( ++ +) o ( ++ –) o (– ++) o (+ – +).
Figure 2Comparison of next-generation sequencing (NGS) analysis and GeneScan analysis in endemic Burkitt lymphoma (eBL) and sporadic Burkitt lymphoma (sBL). In NGS analysis for eBL (A) and sBL (B) and GeneScan analysis for eBL (C) and sBL (D), NGS showed the presence of multiple clusters sharing the same VDJ and CDR3 in eBL compared with sBL. E and F, sequences of clusters.
Figure 3Evolutionary history of endemic Burkitt lymphoma (eBL) and example of clonal heterogeneity in case eBL31. In case eBL31, different clusters showing identical IGHV, IGHD, and IGHJ usage and related CDR3 regions but exhibiting different somatic mutations and sequences with different lengths for the presence of nucleotide deletion were detected by next-generation sequencing analysis. The putative progenitors are depicted with gray nuclei, and the IGHV gene rearrangement of the clonally related cells deriving from each progenitor is indicated above. Shared point mutations and acquired unique mutations are indicated above and below the line, respectively. Vertical bars depict S mutations, lollipops depict R mutations, and red squares depict nucleotide deletions.
Figure 4IGHV gene usage analysis in endemic Burkitt lymphoma (eBL) (A) and sporadic Burkitt lymphoma (sBL) (B). IGHV gene usage analysis showed that eBL has a preferential usage of the VH3-23, VH4-34, and VH1-69 family gene and that sBL has a preferential usage of the VH3-23 family gene.