Literature DB >> 34115872

Measured versus predicted postoperative pulmonary function at repeated times up to 1 year after lobectomy.

Takamasa Shibazaki1, Shohei Mori1, Eriko Harada1, Rintaro Shigemori1, Daiki Kato1, Hideki Matsudaira1, Jun Hirano1, Takashi Ohtsuka1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Postoperative pulmonary function is difficult to predict accurately, because it changes from the time of the operation and is also affected by various factors. The objective of this study was to assess the accuracy of predicted postoperative forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) at different postoperative times after lobectomy.
METHODS: This retrospective study enrolled 104 patients who underwent lobectomy by video-assisted thoracic surgery. Pulmonary function tests were performed preoperatively and postoperatively at 3, 6 and 12 months. We investigated time-dependent changes in FEV1. In addition, the ratio of measured to predicted postoperative FEV1 calculated by the subsegmental method was evaluated to identify the factors associated with variations in postoperative FEV1.
RESULTS: Compared with the predicted postoperative FEV1, the measured postoperative FEV1 was 8% higher at 3 months, 11% higher at 6 months and 13% higher at 12 months. The measured postoperative FEV1 significantly increased from 3 to 6 months (P = 0.002) and from 6 to 12 months (P = 0.015) after lobectomy resected lobe, smoking history and body mass index were significant factors associated with the ratio of measured to predicted postoperative FEV1 at 12 months (P < 0.001, P = 0.036 and P = 0.025, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative FEV1 increased up to 12 months after lobectomy by video-assisted thoracic surgery. The predicted postoperative pulmonary function was underestimated after 3 months, particularly after lower lobectomy.
© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Lobectomy; Pulmonary function; Video-assisted thoracic surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34115872      PMCID: PMC8691694          DOI: 10.1093/icvts/ivab168

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg        ISSN: 1569-9285


  24 in total

1.  BTS guidelines: guidelines on the selection of patients with lung cancer for surgery.

Authors: 
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 9.139

2.  Evaluation of expiratory volume, diffusion capacity, and exercise tolerance following major lung resection: a prospective follow-up analysis.

Authors:  Alessandro Brunelli; Francesco Xiumé; Majed Refai; Michele Salati; Rita Marasco; Valeria Sciarra; Armando Sabbatini
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 9.410

3.  Long-term recovery of exercise capacity and pulmonary function after lobectomy.

Authors:  Yoshinori Nagamatsu; Kanetaka Maeshiro; Norman Y Kimura; Tatsuya Nishi; Ichirou Shima; Hideaki Yamana; Kazuo Shirouzu
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 5.209

4.  Compensation of pulmonary function after upper lobectomy versus lower lobectomy.

Authors:  Kazuhiro Ueda; Toshiki Tanaka; Masataro Hayashi; Tao-Sheng Li; Takehiro Kaneoka; Nobuyuki Tanaka; Kimikazu Hamano
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2011-06-15       Impact factor: 5.209

5.  Predicted versus observed FEV1 in the immediate postoperative period after pulmonary lobectomy.

Authors:  Gonzalo Varela; Alessandro Brunelli; Gaetano Rocco; Rita Marasco; Marcelo F Jiménez; Valeria Sciarra; José Luis Aranda; Tindaro Gatani
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2006-08-08       Impact factor: 4.191

6.  Preoperative pulmonary function testing to predict postoperative morbidity and mortality.

Authors:  G D Gass; G N Olsen
Journal:  Chest       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 9.410

7.  Prediction of postoperative respiratory failure in patients undergoing lung resection for lung cancer.

Authors:  K Nakahara; K Ohno; J Hashimoto; S Miyoshi; H Maeda; A Matsumura; T Mizuta; A Akashi; K Nakagawa; Y Kawashima
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 4.330

8.  Physiologic evaluation of the patient with lung cancer being considered for resectional surgery: ACCP evidenced-based clinical practice guidelines (2nd edition).

Authors:  Gene L Colice; Shirin Shafazand; John P Griffin; Robert Keenan; Chris T Bolliger
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 9.410

9.  Assessment of operative risk in patients undergoing lung resection. Importance of predicted pulmonary function.

Authors:  D J Kearney; T H Lee; J J Reilly; M M DeCamp; D J Sugarbaker
Journal:  Chest       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 9.410

10.  Lung scanning and exercise testing for the prediction of postoperative performance in lung resection candidates at increased risk for complications.

Authors:  C T Bolliger; C Wyser; H Roser; M Solèr; A P Perruchoud
Journal:  Chest       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 9.410

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Rapid Recovery of Postoperative Pulmonary Function in Patients With Lung Cancer and Influencing Factors.

Authors:  Yang Fuzhi; Tang Dongfang; Fu Wentao; Wang Jing; Wu Yingting; Mo Nianping; Gao Wen; Shen Xiaoyong
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-07-11       Impact factor: 5.738

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.