Literature DB >> 7634864

Lung scanning and exercise testing for the prediction of postoperative performance in lung resection candidates at increased risk for complications.

C T Bolliger1, C Wyser, H Roser, M Solèr, A P Perruchoud.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the value of preoperative lung scanning and exercise testing for the prediction of postoperative complications and of the short- as well as long-term performance in lung resection candidates at increased risk for complications.
DESIGN: Prospective clinical trial.
SETTING: Clinical pulmonary function laboratory in a university teaching hospital. PATIENTS: Twenty-five (mean age, 63 years; 17 men) of 84 consecutive lung resection candidates were considered at increased risk for postoperative complications due to impaired pulmonary function (FEV1 < 2 L or diffusion of carbon monoxide [DCO] < 50% predicted, or FEV1 and DCO < or = 80% predicted combined with New York Heart Association dyspnea index > or = 2).
INTERVENTIONS: Candidates underwent radionuclide ventilation/perfusion scans and exercise testing to predict postoperative (= ppo) values for FEV1, DCO, and maximal O2 uptake (VO2max). They all underwent thoracotomy for neoplastic lesions; 7 had pneumonectomies, 18 lobectomies. Six patients had postoperative complications (within 30 days), of whom three died. Three and 6 months postoperatively, pulmonary function tests and VO2max were repeated. MEASUREMENTS AND
RESULTS: In the 22 survivors, the observed values were then compared with the predicted values. At 3 months, there were excellent correlations (absolute/predicted values): for FEV1 r = 0.78 and 0.81; for DCO, r = 0.77 and 0.74; and for VO2max, r = 0.71 and 0.83. The means of FEV1 and VO2max did not differ from the predicted values, whereas the predicted DCO was lower than the observed value (mL/min/mm Hg: 15.1 vs 17.9; percent predicted: 59.6 vs 70.9) (p < 0.05). At 6 months, correlations remained very good for FEV1 (r = 0.81 and 0.84) and for DCO (r = 0.76 and 0.74), but had decreased for VO2max to 0.56 and 0.65, respectively. All means were higher than predicted (p < 0.05) owing to recovery in the lobectomy group. Patients with postoperative complications (group B) had a lower preoperative VO2max in percent predicted (62.8 +/- 7.5% vs 84.6 +/- 19.7%) (p < 0.01) and also a lower VO2max-ppo (10.6 +/- 3.6 vs 14.8 +/- 3.5 mL/kg/min and 44.3 +/- 13.5 vs 68.0 +/- 20.7% predicted) (p < 0.05) than patients without complications (group A). A VO2max-ppo < 10 mL/kg/min was associated with a 100% mortality. Although FEV1-ppo and DCO-ppo were lower in group B, the difference did not reach significance.
CONCLUSIONS: Radionuclide-based calculations of postoperative VO2max are predictive of operative morbidity and mortality: a VO2max-ppo of < 10 mL/kg/min may indicate inoperability. Further, short-term postoperative performance is accurately predicted by FEV1-ppo and VO2max-ppo, but long-term function is underestimated after lobectomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7634864     DOI: 10.1378/chest.108.2.341

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chest        ISSN: 0012-3692            Impact factor:   9.410


  20 in total

1.  BTS guidelines: guidelines on the selection of patients with lung cancer for surgery.

Authors: 
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 9.139

2.  Predicting length of stay out of hospital following lung resection using preoperative health status measures.

Authors:  Janet A Parsons; Michael R Johnston; Arthur S Slutsky
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  Impact of Sublobar Resection on Pulmonary Function: Long-Term Results from American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z4032 (Alliance).

Authors:  Michael S Kent; Sumithra J Mandrekar; Rodney Landreneau; Francis Nichols; Thomas A DiPetrillo; Bryan Meyers; Dwight E Heron; David R Jones; Angelina D Tan; Sandra Starnes; Joe B Putnam; Hiran C Fernando
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2016-04-19       Impact factor: 4.330

Review 4.  Risk assessment of lung resection for lung cancer according to pulmonary function: republication of systematic review and proposals by guideline committee of the Japanese association for chest surgery 2014.

Authors:  Noriyoshi Sawabata; Takashi Nagayasu; Yoshihisa Kadota; Taichiro Goto; Hiroyoshi Horio; Takeshi Mori; Shinichi Yamashita; Akinori Iwasaki
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2014-09-27

Review 5.  Preoperative functional workup for patients with advanced lung cancer.

Authors:  Alessandro Brunelli
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 2.895

6.  Racial differences in patients' perceptions of debilitated health states.

Authors:  S Cykert; J D Joines; G Kissling; C J Hansen
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  Lobar volume reduction surgery: a method of increasing the lung cancer resection rate in patients with emphysema.

Authors:  J G Edwards; D J Duthie; D A Waller
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 9.139

Review 8.  SBRT in operable early stage lung cancer patients.

Authors:  Johannes Roesch; Nicolaus Andratschke; Matthias Guckenberger
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2014-08

Review 9.  [Thoracic surgery in the elderly].

Authors:  H Dienemann; H Hoffmann; F Herth
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 0.955

10.  Role of quantitative CT in predicting postoperative FEV1 and chronic dyspnea in patients undergoing lung resection.

Authors:  Chrysovalantis V Papageorgiou; Dimosthenis Antoniou; Georgios Kaltsakas; Nikolaos G Koulouris
Journal:  Multidiscip Respir Med       Date:  2010-06-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.