Morgan J Homan1, Andrea Franson2, Karthik Ravi2, Holly Roberts2, Manjunath P Pai3, Cai Liu3, Miao He, Aleksas Matvekas3, Carl Koschmann2, Bernard L Marini4. 1. Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacy Services, University of Michigan College of Pharmacy, 1540 E. Hospital Dr., CW 7-251B, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109-5008, US. 2. University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, US. 3. University of Michigan College of Pharmacy, Ann Arbor, MI, US. 4. Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacy Services, Inpatient Hematology, University of Michigan College of Pharmacy, 1540 E. Hospital Dr., CW 7-251B, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109-5008, US. bernmari@med.umich.edu.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Panobinostat, an orally bioavailable pan-HDAC inhibitor, has demonstrated potent activity in multiple malignancies, including pediatric brain tumors such as DIPG, with increased activity against H3K27M mutant cell lines. Given limited evidence regarding the CNS penetration of panobinostat, we sought to characterize its BBB penetration in a murine model. METHODS: Panobinostat 15 mg/kg was administered IV to 12 CD-1 female mice. At specified time points, mice were euthanized, blood samples were collected, and brains were removed. LC-MS was performed to quantify panobinostat concentrations. Cmax and AUC were estimated and correlated with previously published pharmacokinetic analyses and reports of IC-50 values in DIPG cell lines. RESULTS: Mean panobinostat plasma concentrations (ng/mL) were 27.3 ± 2.5 at 1 h, 7.56 ± 1.8 at 2 h, 1.48 ± 0.56 at 4 h, and 2.33 ± 1.18 at 7 h. Mean panobinostat brain concentrations (ng/g) were 60.5 ± 6.1 at 1 h, 42.9 ± 5.4 at 2 h, 33.2 ± 6.1 at 4 h, and 28.1 ± 4.3 at 7 h. Brain-to-plasma ratio at 1 h was 2.22 and the brain to plasma AUC ratio was 2.63. Based on the published human pharmacokinetic data, the anticipated Cmax in humans is expected to be significantly higher than the IC-50 identified in DIPG models. CONCLUSION: It is expected that panobinostat would be effective in CNS tumors where the IC-50 is in the low nanomolar range. Thus, our data demonstrate panobinostat crosses the BBB and achieves concentrations above the IC-50 for DIPG and other brain tumors and should be explored further for clinical efficacy.
PURPOSE: Panobinostat, an orally bioavailable pan-HDAC inhibitor, has demonstrated potent activity in multiple malignancies, including pediatric brain tumors such as DIPG, with increased activity against H3K27M mutant cell lines. Given limited evidence regarding the CNS penetration of panobinostat, we sought to characterize its BBB penetration in a murine model. METHODS: Panobinostat 15 mg/kg was administered IV to 12 CD-1 female mice. At specified time points, mice were euthanized, blood samples were collected, and brains were removed. LC-MS was performed to quantify panobinostat concentrations. Cmax and AUC were estimated and correlated with previously published pharmacokinetic analyses and reports of IC-50 values in DIPG cell lines. RESULTS: Mean panobinostat plasma concentrations (ng/mL) were 27.3 ± 2.5 at 1 h, 7.56 ± 1.8 at 2 h, 1.48 ± 0.56 at 4 h, and 2.33 ± 1.18 at 7 h. Mean panobinostat brain concentrations (ng/g) were 60.5 ± 6.1 at 1 h, 42.9 ± 5.4 at 2 h, 33.2 ± 6.1 at 4 h, and 28.1 ± 4.3 at 7 h. Brain-to-plasma ratio at 1 h was 2.22 and the brain to plasma AUC ratio was 2.63. Based on the published human pharmacokinetic data, the anticipated Cmax in humans is expected to be significantly higher than the IC-50 identified in DIPG models. CONCLUSION: It is expected that panobinostat would be effective in CNS tumors where the IC-50 is in the low nanomolar range. Thus, our data demonstrate panobinostat crosses the BBB and achieves concentrations above the IC-50 for DIPG and other brain tumors and should be explored further for clinical efficacy.
Authors: Paul G Richardson; Robert L Schlossman; Melissa Alsina; Donna M Weber; Steven E Coutre; Cristina Gasparetto; Sutapa Mukhopadhyay; Michael S Ondovik; Mahmudul Khan; Carole S Paley; Sagar Lonial Journal: Blood Date: 2013-08-15 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Paul J Wood; Robyn Strong; Grant A McArthur; Michael Michael; Elizabeth Algar; Andrea Muscat; Lin Rigby; Melissa Ferguson; David M Ashley Journal: Cancer Chemother Pharmacol Date: 2018-07-09 Impact factor: 3.333
Authors: Jesús F San-Miguel; Vânia T M Hungria; Sung-Soo Yoon; Meral Beksac; Meletios Athanasios Dimopoulos; Ashraf Elghandour; Wieslaw Wiktor Jedrzejczak; Andreas Günther; Thanyaphong Na Nakorn; Noppadol Siritanaratkul; Paolo Corradini; Suporn Chuncharunee; Je-Jung Lee; Robert L Schlossman; Tatiana Shelekhova; Kwee Yong; Daryl Tan; Tontanai Numbenjapon; Jamie D Cavenagh; Jian Hou; Richard LeBlanc; Hareth Nahi; Lugui Qiu; Hans Salwender; Stefano Pulini; Philippe Moreau; Krzysztof Warzocha; Darrell White; Joan Bladé; WenMing Chen; Javier de la Rubia; Peter Gimsing; Sagar Lonial; Jonathan L Kaufman; Enrique M Ocio; Ljupco Veskovski; Sang Kyun Sohn; Ming-Chung Wang; Jae Hoon Lee; Hermann Einsele; Monika Sopala; Claudia Corrado; Bourras-Rezki Bengoudifa; Florence Binlich; Paul G Richardson Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2014-09-18 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Tammy Hennika; Guo Hu; Nagore G Olaciregui; Kelly L Barton; Anahid Ehteda; Arjanna Chitranjan; Cecilia Chang; Andrew J Gifford; Maria Tsoli; David S Ziegler; Angel M Carcaboso; Oren J Becher Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-01-04 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Alan Mackay; Anna Burford; Diana Carvalho; Elisa Izquierdo; Janat Fazal-Salom; Kathryn R Taylor; Lynn Bjerke; Matthew Clarke; Mara Vinci; Meera Nandhabalan; Sara Temelso; Sergey Popov; Valeria Molinari; Pichai Raman; Angela J Waanders; Harry J Han; Saumya Gupta; Lynley Marshall; Stergios Zacharoulis; Sucheta Vaidya; Henry C Mandeville; Leslie R Bridges; Andrew J Martin; Safa Al-Sarraj; Christopher Chandler; Ho-Keung Ng; Xingang Li; Kun Mu; Saoussen Trabelsi; Dorra H'mida-Ben Brahim; Alexei N Kisljakov; Dmitry M Konovalov; Andrew S Moore; Angel Montero Carcaboso; Mariona Sunol; Carmen de Torres; Ofelia Cruz; Jaume Mora; Ludmila I Shats; João N Stavale; Lucas T Bidinotto; Rui M Reis; Natacha Entz-Werle; Michael Farrell; Jane Cryan; Darach Crimmins; John Caird; Jane Pears; Michelle Monje; Marie-Anne Debily; David Castel; Jacques Grill; Cynthia Hawkins; Hamid Nikbakht; Nada Jabado; Suzanne J Baker; Stefan M Pfister; David T W Jones; Maryam Fouladi; André O von Bueren; Michael Baudis; Adam Resnick; Chris Jones Journal: Cancer Cell Date: 2017-09-28 Impact factor: 31.743