| Literature DB >> 34115031 |
Yuanshi She1, Dongsheng Guo2, Guangxiang Chen3, Youjia Xu1.
Abstract
ABSTRACT: To investigate the clinical outcomes of arthroscopy-assisted transosseous fixation of tibial eminence fractures with the Versalok suture anchor in adults.A total of 23 adult cases of tibial eminence fractures treated between June 2016 and March 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. The results of the preoperative drawer test and Lachman test were positive. Radiography and computed tomography were performed before and after the procedure. Magnetic resonance imaging was performed in every patient after admission. Arthroscopy-assisted fracture reduction and Orthocord high-strength suture fixation with two Versalok anchors were performed in all the patients. The International Knee Documentation Committee scale and the Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale were used to evaluate outcomes during the follow-up period. Additionally, the KT-2000 knee stability test was performed.At the final follow-up, all the fractures had proceeded to bony union and no wound infection was observed. The average Lysholm Knee Score of the affected knees was 93.1 (range, 90-98), which was not significantly different from that of the healthy knees (t = 0.732, P = .132). Based on the International Knee Documentation Committee scale results, 21 patients were graded as normal and the other 2 patients were graded as nearly normal. The KT-2000 test showed that the anterior displacement of the affected side and the healthy side was less than 3.6 mm in all cases.The outcomes indicated firm fixation and good fracture healing with minimal trauma. Thus, arthroscopy-assisted transosseous fixation with Versalok suture anchors for adult tibial eminence fractures seems to have satisfactory clinical outcomes.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34115031 PMCID: PMC8202665 DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000026284
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) ISSN: 0025-7974 Impact factor: 1.817
Figure 1Preoperative radiograph (A) and CT (B) findings for a type III typical tibial eminence fracture according to modified Meyers-McKeever classification.
Figure 2Debriding of the hematoma of the fracture bed with an arthroscopic shaver. (ACL = anterior cruciate ligament, FF = fracture fragment; LFC = lateral femoral condyle).
Figure 3Satisfactory fracture reduction and fixation in the anteroposterior and lateral planes with Versalok suture anchors.
Figure 4Radiograph showing satisfactory healing of the fracture.
Patient demographic data.
| Demographic variables | Mean | Range |
| Follow-up time (mo) | 8.5 | 6–14 |
| Age (yr) | 38.3 | 22–63 |
| Interval between injury and procedure (d) | 6.5 | 2–123 |
| Gender (n) | ||
| Male | 8 | |
| Female | 15 | |
| Fracture classification (n) | ||
| Type II | 3 | |
| Type III | 16 | |
| Type IV | 4 | |
Figure 5Preoperative radiograph and MRI findings in a case of ununited tibial eminence fracture. MRI = magnetic resonance imaging.
Figure 6Postoperative CT scan showing satisfactory fracture reduction and healing in the case of ununited tibial eminence fracture. CT =computed tomography.
Patient outcomes.
| Mean | Range | |
| Lysholm score | 93.1 | 90–98 |
| IKDC objective evaluation | ||
| Normal (n) | 21 | |
| Nearly normal (n) | 2 | |
| IKDC subjective score | 93.7 | 88–97 |
| Side-to-side distance on the KT-2000 test (mm) | 2.8 | 2.0–3.6 |
IKDC = International Knee Documentation Committee.