Literature DB >> 34114180

Unrecognized Pitfall When Doing Nerve-Sparing Surgery in Radical Prostatectomy.

Leandro Blas1, Masaki Shiota2.   

Abstract

Year:  2021        PMID： 34114180     DOI： 10.1245/s10434-021-10282-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN： 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


× No keyword cloud information.
  11 in total

1.  Nerve-sparing approach during radical prostatectomy is strongly associated with the rate of postoperative urinary continence recovery.

Authors:  Nazareno Suardi; Marco Moschini; Andrea Gallina; Giorgio Gandaglia; Firas Abdollah; Umberto Capitanio; Marco Bianchi; Manuela Tutolo; Niccolò Passoni; Andrea Salonia; Petter Hedlund; Patrizio Rigatti; Francesco Montorsi; Alberto Briganti
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2012-06-21       Impact factor: 5.588

Review 2.  Primary Gleason grade and Gleason grade group at positive surgical margins: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Athul John; Hritik John; Rick Catterwell; Luke A Selth; Michael O Callaghan
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2021-05       Impact factor: 5.588

3.  Long-term oncological outcomes of apical positive surgical margins at radical prostatectomy in the Shared Equal Access Regional Cancer Hospital cohort.

Authors:  H Wadhwa; M K Terris; W J Aronson; C J Kane; C L Amling; M R Cooperberg; S J Freedland; M R Abern
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2016-10-04       Impact factor: 5.554

Review 4.  The importance of surgical margins in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Prasanna Sooriakumaran; Harveer S Dev; Douglas Skarecky; Thomas Ahlering
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2016-03-23       Impact factor: 3.454

Review 5.  A Critical Analysis of the Current Knowledge of Surgical Anatomy of the Prostate Related to Optimisation of Cancer Control and Preservation of Continence and Erection in Candidates for Radical Prostatectomy: An Update.

Authors:  Jochen Walz; Jonathan I Epstein; Roman Ganzer; Markus Graefen; Giorgio Guazzoni; Jihad Kaouk; Mani Menon; Alexandre Mottrie; Robert P Myers; Vipul Patel; Ashutosh Tewari; Arnauld Villers; Walter Artibani
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2016-02-02       Impact factor: 20.096

6.  Pentafecta: a new concept for reporting outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Vipul R Patel; Ananthakrishnan Sivaraman; Rafael F Coelho; Sanket Chauhan; Kenneth J Palmer; Marcelo A Orvieto; Ignacio Camacho; Geoff Coughlin; Bernardo Rocco
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2011-01-25       Impact factor: 20.096

7.  Prognostic significance of location of positive margins in radical prostatectomy specimens.

Authors:  James A Eastham; Kentaro Kuroiwa; Makoto Ohori; Angel M Serio; Alex Gorbonos; Norio Maru; Andrew J Vickers; Kevin M Slawin; Thomas M Wheeler; Victor E Reuter; Peter T Scardino
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 2.649

8.  Intraoperative Frozen Section for Margin Evaluation During Radical Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Eoin P Dinneen; Michelle Van Der Slot; Kelvin Adasonla; Jin Tan; Jack Grierson; Aiman Haider; Alex Freeman; Neil Oakley; Greg Shaw
Journal:  Eur Urol Focus       Date:  2019-11-29

Review 9.  Positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and contemporary update.

Authors:  Ofer Yossepowitch; Alberto Briganti; James A Eastham; Jonathan Epstein; Markus Graefen; Rodolfo Montironi; Karim Touijer
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2013-08-03       Impact factor: 20.096

10.  ASO Visual Abstract: Incidence of Recurrent Laryngeal Nerve Palsy in Robot-Assisted Versus Conventional Minimally Invasive McKeown Esophagectomy in Prone Position: A Propensity Score-Matched Study.

Authors:  Taro Oshikiri; Hironobu Goto; Manabu Horikawa; Naoki Urakawa; Hiroshi Hasegawa; Shingo Kanaji; Kimihiro Yamashita; Takeru Matsuda; Tetsu Nakamura; Yoshihiro Kakeji
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-12       Impact factor: 5.344
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.