| Literature DB >> 34113874 |
Andreas A Boehmer1, Stamatis Georgopoulos1, Johannes Nagel2, Thomas Rostock3, Axel Bauer4, Joachim R Ehrlich1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Recent animal and human studies have shown antiarrhythmic effects inhibiting inducibility of atrial fibrillation through low-level transcutaneous electrical stimulation at the auricular branch of the vagus nerve (ABVN).Entities:
Keywords: Acupuncture; Atrial fibrillation; Auricular branch of the vagus nerve; Autonomous cardiac nervous system; Heart rate variability; Vagus nerve
Year: 2020 PMID: 34113874 PMCID: PMC8183808 DOI: 10.1016/j.hroo.2020.06.001
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Heart Rhythm O2 ISSN: 2666-5018
Figure 1Acupuncture points used in this study. A: Ma35 (PLACEBO). B: Auricular branch of the vagus nerve; acupuncture needle in situ.
Figure 2Schematic of test sequence.
Comparison between placebo (n = 24, acupuncture at Ma35) and control (n = 12, no acupuncture) group
| Parameter | Position | Placebo | Control | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heart Rate [beats/min] | supine | 64 ± 2 | 60 ± 1 | .79 |
| sitting | 74 ± 2 | 65 ± 1 | .02 | |
| standing | 84 ± 3 | 79 ± 1 | .92 | |
| SDNN [ms] | supine | 78 ± 5 | 86 ± 4 | .83 |
| sitting | 102 ± 8 | 115 ± 8 | .73 | |
| standing | 79 ± 5 | 84 ± 4 | .67 | |
| RMSSD [ms] | supine | 46 ± 4 | 51 ± 5 | .99 |
| sitting | 37 ± 3 | 46 ± 3 | .19 | |
| standing | 28 ± 2 | 29 ± 2 | .98 | |
| HF [ms2, nu] | supine | 627 ± 105 [0.29] | 593 ± 108 [0.22] | .053 [nu] |
| sitting | 443 ± 73 [0.13] | 455 ± 82 [0.19] | .033 [nu] | |
| standing | 231 ± 33 [0.07] | 178 ± 30 [0.06] | .37 [nu] | |
| LF [ms2, nu] | supine | 1614± 274 [0.72] | 1929 ± 219 [0.78] | .053 [nu] |
| sitting | 3649 ± 695 [0.87] | 2153 ± 312 [0.81] | .033 [nu] | |
| standing | 3428 ± 497 [0.93] | 2647 ± 394 [0.94] | .37 [nu] | |
| LF/HF | supine | 3,7 ± 1 | 6 ± 1 | .12 |
| sitting | 10 ± 1 | 9 ± 2 | .16 | |
| standing | 19 ± 4 | 23 ± 3 | .64 |
HF = high frequency; LF = low frequency; RMSSD = root mean square of successive R-R interval differences; SDNN = standard deviation of normal-to-normal intervals.
For power spectral density parameters, the P values given are for normalized units (nu).
Figure 3Comparison of heart rate (A: supine; B: sitting; C: standing) and standard deviation of normal-to-normal intervals (SDNN) (D: supine; E: sitting; F: standing) between auricular branch of the vagus nerve (ABVN) and Placebo.
Comparison between auricular branch of the vagus nerve (n = 24, acupuncture at ABVN) and placebo (n=24, acupuncture at Ma35)
| Parameter | Position | ABVN | Placebo | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heart Rate [beats/min] | supine | 60 ± 2 | 64 ± 2 | .049 |
| sitting | 71 ± 2 | 74 ± 2 | .026 | |
| standing | 84 ± 2 | 84 ± 3 | .916 | |
| SDNN [ms] | supine | 93 ± 6 | 78 ± 5 | .012 |
| sitting | 108 ± 2 | 102 ± 8 | .331 | |
| standing | 85 ± 5 | 79 ± 5 | .038 | |
| RMSSD [ms] | supine | 52 ± 4 | 46 ± 4 | .081 |
| sitting | 40 ± 3 | 37 ± 3 | .081 | |
| standing | 28 ± 1 | 28 ± 2 | .85 | |
| HF [ms2, nu] | supine | 743 ± 103 [0.33] | 627 ± 105 [0.29] | .09 [nu] |
| sitting | 529 ± 97 [0.15] | 443 ± 73 [0.13] | .39 [nu] | |
| standing | 249 ± 40 [0.08] | 231 ± 33 [0.07] | .6 [nu] | |
| LF [ms2, nu] | supine | 1658 ± 224 [0.67] | 1614± 274 [0.72] | .09 [nu] |
| sitting | 3635 ± 589 [0.85] | 3649 ± 695 [0.87] | .39 [nu] | |
| standing | 3631 ± 597 [0.92] | 3428 ± 497 [0.93] | .6 [nu] | |
| LF/HF | supine | 3 ± 1 | 3,7 ± 1 | .08 |
| sitting | 11 ± 2 | 10 ± 1 | .82 | |
| standing | 19 ± 3 | 19 ± 4 | .93 |
HF = high frequency; LF = low frequency; RMSSD = root mean square of successive R-R interval differences; SDNN = standard deviation of normal-to-normal intervals.
For power spectral density parameters, the P values given are for normalized units (nu).
Figure 4Schematic diagram of the hypothesized neural arc induced by acupuncture at the auricular branch of the vagus nerve (ABVN). Acupuncture at the ABVN increases the activity of the solitary nucleus (NTS) projecting to the vagal efferent neurons of the nucleus ambiguus (AMB) and dorsal motor nucleus (DMN) and thus resulting in enhanced parasympathetic (PARA SYMP) activation. Furthermore, activation of the solitary nucleus indirectly leads to sympathetic inhibition (SYMP) via a baroreflex-like effect.