Literature DB >> 34111431

COVID-19 during Pregnancy: Clinical and In Vitro Evidence against Placenta Infection at Term by SARS-CoV-2.

Arthur Colson1, Christophe L Depoix2, Géraldine Dessilly3, Pamela Baldin4, Olivier Danhaive5, Corinne Hubinont6, Pierre Sonveaux7, Frédéric Debiève6.   

Abstract

Despite occasional reports of SARS-CoV-2 vertical transmission during pregnancy, the question of placental infection and its consequences for the newborn remain questionable. Here, we analyzed the placentas of 31 COVID-19-positive mothers by RT-PCR, immunohistochemistry and in situ hybridization. We only detected one case of placental infection, which was associated with intrauterine demise of the fetus. We then isolated and differentiated primary trophoblasts from non-pathological human placentas at term, and exposed them to SARS-CoV-2 virions. Unlike for positive control cells Vero E6, we were not able to detect the virus inside cytotrophoblasts and syncytiotrophoblasts or in the supernatant four days after infection. As a mechanism of defense, we hypothesized that trophoblasts at term do not express ACE2 and TMPRSS, the two main host membrane receptors for SARS-CoV-2 entry. The quantification of these proteins in the placenta during pregnancy confirmed the absence of TMPRSS2 at the surface of the syncytium. Surprisingly, a transiently induced experimental expression of TMPRSS2 did not allow the entry or replication of the virus in differentiated trophoblasts. Altogether, these results underline that trophoblasts are not likely to be infected by SARS-CoV-2 at term, but the reported case raises concern about preterm infection.
Copyright © 2021 American Society for Investigative Pathology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 34111431      PMCID: PMC8184362          DOI: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2021.05.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Pathol        ISSN: 0002-9440            Impact factor:   4.307


Within a year, the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has become a worldwide health and social crisis, deeply affecting human lives and questioning the future of humankind. Although our knowledge about COVID-19 has exponentially increased, many questions remain to be answered. Pregnant women are particularly vulnerable to respiratory infectious diseases because of the remodeling of their immune and cardiovascular systems. Initially, it was shown that pregnant women infected by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) are more likely to require intensive care treatment, and their pregnancies are associated with increased incidence of miscarriage, preterm birth, preeclampsia, cesarean delivery, and perinatal deaths. The meta-analyses are less clear, as maternal COVID-19 was not necessarily associated with adverse pregnancy and neonatal complications.3, 4, 5, 6 Maternofetal transmission of SARS-CoV-2 remains a matter of investigation because few neonates have shown evidence of contamination following maternal infection. Direct involvement of the placenta is rare, and robust virological evidence, whether by reverse transcriptase PCR, immunohistochemistry (IHC), or in situ hybridization (ISH), is often missing in the reported cases.8, 9, 10 However, the debate was revived with the documentation of intrauterine transmission and placental infection.11, 12, 13 As SARS-CoV-2 has been detected in the blood of severely ill patients, circulating viral particles are likely to interact with the maternofetal interface. Especially, the mononuclear villous cytotrophoblasts (CTBs) fuse and differentiate into syncytiotrophoblasts (STBs), which are in direct contact with maternal blood. SARS-CoV-2 is a β-coronavirus composed of spike, envelope, membrane, and nucleocapsid proteins encompassing a single-stranded RNA genome of 29,891 nucleotides. Its infectivity depends primarily on the expression, localization, and structure of the transmembrane proteins angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) and the transmembrane protease serine 2 (TMPRSS2). To infect human cells, SARS-CoV-2 engages ACE2 as the entry receptor and employs TMPRSS2 for spike protein priming, allowing the fusion of viral and cellular membranes. ACE2 and TMPRSS2 expression at the surface of cells is therefore considered as a biological indicator of their susceptibility for SARS-CoV-2 infection. ACE2 and TMPRSS2 were detected in the human placenta throughout pregnancy, but their co-expression by syncytiotrophoblasts remains controversial.18, 19, 20 This study aimed to explore the probability of vertical transmission through placental infection by SARS-CoV-2. In a cohort of 31 pregnant women with maternal COVID-19, the viral expression and clinical/immune responses of the mother-infant dyad to SARS-CoV-2 infection were characterized. Then, using a combination of histologic observations and culture of human primary trophoblasts, placental suscptibility to infection was tested and potential mechanisms of resistance to the virus entry were investigated.

Materials and Methods

Clinical Study and Sample Collection

This study was conducted with the approval of the Ethical Committee of the Catholic University of Louvain (approval number 2020/18AVR/228) in Saint-Luc University Hospital (Brussels, Belgium). Between April 1, 2020, and December 1, 2020, 31 pregnant women who were tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 by reverse transcriptase PCR during their pregnancy were included after informed consent. After delivery, one piece of the placenta was quickly stored in RNAlater (Invitrogen, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA) at −80°C. Placental samples were fixed in formalin and paraffin embedded for histologic analyses. For a subset of patients, additional samples were collected during their hospitalization for delivery: maternal plasma, vaginal swab, rectal swab, maternal urine, maternal milk, plasma from cord blood, nasopharyngeal neonatal swab, and fetal urine.

Detection of SARS-CoV-2 by Reverse Transcriptase PCR

Detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA was performed using reverse transcriptase PCR, according to the protocol of the Pasteur Institute (Paris, France). Briefly, viral RNA was extracted from liquid samples using QIAamp MinElute Virus Spin Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) and from tissue samples with PureLink RNA Mini Kit (Invitrogen, Thermo Fisher Scientific). Extracted RNA was eluted in 30 μL of elution buffer. The PCR amplification regions (positions according to SARS-CoV, NC_004718; , last accessed August 4, 2021) were nCoV_IP2/12621-12727 and nCoV_IP4/14010-14116. A 25-μL reaction containing 5 μL of extracted RNA and 0.4 μmol/L of specific primers [RdRp_nCoV_IP2, 5′-ATGAGCTTAGTCCTGTTG-3′ (forward) and 5′-CTCCCTTTGTTGTGTTGT-3′ (reverse), AGATGTCTTGTGCTGCCGGTA [5']Hex [3']BHQ-1; RdRp_nCoV_IP4, 5′-GGTAACTGGTATGATTTCG-3′ (forward) and 5′-CTGGTCAAGGTTAATATAGG-3′ (reverse), TCATACAAACCACGCCAGG [5']Fam [3']BHQ-1] was performed with Takyon One-Step ROX Probe 5× MasterMix dTTP blue (Eurogentec, Seraing, Belgium) and amplified on a StepOne Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems, Thermo Fisher Scientific). In addition to unknown samples, each assay includes one negative control (water) and five positive controls consisting of in vitro synthesized RNA transcripts (107, 106, 105, 104, and 103 copies genome equivalent).

Detection of Anti–SARS-CoV-2 Antibodies in Plasma

The presence of antibodies in maternal and fetal plasma samples was investigated by using the Elecsys anti–SARS-CoV-2 immunoassay (Roche, Mannheim, Germany), according to manufacturer's protocol. If the test was positive, the Ig class was determined by the MAGLUMI 2019-nCoV IgM/IgG assay (Snibe, Shenzhen, China). Results higher than one arbitrary unit per milliliter were considered to be significant.

Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in Tissue Sections

Three antibodies adapted for IHC were initially tested: two rabbit polyclonal antibodies directed against the spike protein and one mouse monoclonal antibody raised against the nucleocapsid of the virus (Table 1 ). Positive control slides consisted of tissues that were tested positive by reverse transcriptase PCR: a lung autopsy from a COVID-19–deceased patient and the preterm infected placenta. Negative controls were retrieved from 2017 samples: a normal lung biopsy (for diagnosis), a lung biopsy from acute respiratory distress syndrome (from nonvirological origin), and a term placenta from uncomplicated pregnancy (Supplemental Figures S1–S3).
Table 1

Antibodies Used for WB Analysis, IHC, and IF

TargetSourceReferenceUse and technical notes
SARS-CoV-2 spikeSino Biological, Beijing, China40150-V08B1IHC: 1:2000, citrate buffer (pH 5.7)
SARS-CoV-2 spikeGenetex, Irvine, CAGTX632604IHC: 1:200, citrate buffer (pH 5.7)
SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsidInvitrogen, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MAMA17404IHC: 1:100, TE buffer (pH 9)IF: 1:100, methanol
Desmoplakin I + IIAbcam, Cambridge, UKAb16434IF: 1:200, methanol
Cytokeratin 7Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA4465IF: 1:100, methanol
Alexa Fluor 488 anti-mouseCell Signaling Technology4408SIF: secondary antibody, 1:500
Alexa Fluor 555 anti-rabbitCell Signaling Technology4413IF: secondary antibody, 1:500
Human ACE2Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MOAMAb91268IHC: 1:200, citrate buffer (pH 5.7)
Human ACE2Novus Biologicals, Centennial, COAF933WB analysis: 1:400, blocking with milk 5%
Human TMPRSS2Sigma-AldrichHPA035787IHC: 1:300, citrate buffer (pH 5.7)IF: 1:200, PFAWB analysis: 1:1250, blocking with milk 5%

ACE2, angiotensin-converting enzyme 2; IF, immunofluorescence; IHC, immunohistochemistry; PFA, paraformaldehyde; TMPRSS2, transmembrane protease serine 2; WB, Western blot.

Antibodies Used for WB Analysis, IHC, and IF ACE2, angiotensin-converting enzyme 2; IF, immunofluorescence; IHC, immunohistochemistry; PFA, paraformaldehyde; TMPRSS2, transmembrane protease serine 2; WB, Western blot. COVID-19 immunostaining was confirmed with ISH by using the RNAscope 2.5 HD Assay-RED kit (Advanced Cell Diagnostics, Bio-Techne, Minneapolis, MN). A specific probe directed against nCoV2019-S-sense (catalog number 848561, NC_045512.2, , last accessed August 4, 2021) was used to detect viral RNA. The positive probe was directed against UBC (catalog number 310041, NM_021009, , last accessed August 4, 2021), the gene encoding ubiquitin C, to assess sample quality, whereas the negative probe was directed against bacterial gene DapB (catalog number 310043, EF191515, , last accessed August 4, 2021) (Supplemental Figure S4). As a supplementary precaution, only diethylpyrocarbonate-treated water was used to avoid RNA degradation during the experiment.

Human Primary Cytotrophoblast Isolation

Placentas were collected from uncomplicated pregnancies at term to isolate and differentiate primary CTBs into STBs, following a previously validated protocol. Pieces of fresh placenta retrieved from uncomplicated pregnancy at term were digested with Dispase II and DNase I, grade II (Roche). The digested tissue was then sequentially filtered, and the cells were separated by density Percoll gradient centrifugation (GE Healthcare Bio-Sciences AB, Uppsala, Sweden). CTBs were cultured in Iscove's modified Dulbecco's medium (Gibco, Thermo Fisher Scientific) complemented with 50 μg/mL of gentamicin (Carl Roth GmbH & Co, Karlsruhe, Germany) and 10% of fetal bovine serum (Gibco, Thermo Fisher Scientific). Cultures were maintained up to 7 days in an atmosphere-controlled humidified incubator under 21% O2 and 5% CO2 at 37°C.

Exposure to SARS-CoV-2

The SARS-Cov-2 strains were isolated from patient samples (clade 20E/EU1). At 24 or 96 hours after isolation, the cells were exposed to three concentrations of viral particles (109, 108, and 107 copies/mL). Two hours after, the cells were washed three times with phosphate-buffered saline, and fresh medium was added. A negative control (uninfected cells) was included in each experiment, while Vero E6 cells (CRL-1586; ATCC, Manassas, VA) served as a positive control of the infection. Four days later, the supernatant was collected for rapid antigen assessment with CORIS COVID-19 Ag Respi-Strip (International Medical Products, Brussels, Belgium) and viral RNA detection by reverse transcriptase PCR. The cells were also fixed with methanol to detect the viral nucleocapsid by immunofluorescence.

TMPRSS2 Overexpression

Thirty-six hours after isolation (day 2), primary CTBs were transfected with a vector expressing the human isoform 1 of TMPRSS2 by using the Lipofectamine 3000 Transfection Reagent (Invitrogen, Thermo Fisher Scientific). DNA (1 μg) was used in a 12-well format, according to manufacturer's protocol. The plasmid was a gift from Roger Reeves (plasmid number 53887; Addgene, Watertown, MA).

Relative Gene Expression

Total RNA was extracted from cells using PureLink RNA Mini Kit (Invitrogen, Thermo Fisher Scientific), followed by reverse transcription using qScript cDNA SuperMix (Quanta Biosciences, Gaithersburg, MA). Quantitative real-time PCR was performed with 5 ng of cDNA and 0.2 μmol/L of specific primers (Table 2 ) in Takyon ROX SYBR 1× MasterMix dTTP blue (Eurogentec) on a StepOne Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems, Thermo Fisher Scientific). The relative expression ratio of a target gene was calculated following the Pfaffl method, using succinate dehydrogenase A (SDHA) and TATA-box binding protein (TBP) as reference genes.
Table 2

Primers Used for Quantitative Real-Time PCR

GeneForward primerReverse primer
CGB5′-GCTACTGCCCCACCATGACC-3′5′-ATGGACTCGAAGCGCACATC-3′
ACE25′-CGAGTGGCTAATTTGAAACCAAGAA-3′5′-ATTGATACGGCTCCGGGACA-3′
TMPRSS25′-CCTGTGTGCCAAGACGACTG-3′5′-TTATAGCCCATGTCCCTGCAG-3′
SDHA5′-TGGGAACAAGAGGGCATCTG-3′5′-CCACCACTGCATCAAATTCATG-3′
TBP5′-GAACATCATGGATCAGAACAACA-3′5′-ATAGGGATTCCGGGAGTCAT-3′
Primers Used for Quantitative Real-Time PCR

Protein Analysis

Whole-cell lysates were prepared using radioimmunoprecipitation assay buffer (Merck, Burlington, MA) supplemented with Halt Protease Inhibitor Cocktail 1× (Thermo Scientific, Thermo Fisher Scientific). For Western blot analysis, 20 μg of proteins was reduced and proceeded according to a previously published protocol. Proteins were loaded onto a 10% Acrylamide/Bisacrylamide Bolt Bis-Tris mini gel (Invitrogen, Thermo Fisher Scientific) and transferred onto an Invitrolon polyvinylidene difluoride membrane (Invitrogen, Thermo Fisher Scientific). Then, the membrane was blocked before being incubated overnight at 4°C with the primary antibodies (Table 1). The day after, the membrane was washed and incubated for 1 hour with horseradish peroxidase–conjugated secondary antibodies at room temperature (Table 1). Bound antibodies were detected using the SuperSignal West Pico PLUS chemiluminescent substrate (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and Amersham Hyperfilm ECL films (GE Healthcare Limited, Chicago, IL). The supernatant of the last 24 hours was conserved to assess biochemical differentiation of the trophoblasts. Total secreted free β-subunit human chorionic gonadotrophin was quantified with a B.R.A.H.M.S. Kryptor Compact Plus immune analyzer (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and normalized to whole-cell lysates extracted from the same well.

Immunofluorescence

Cells were cultured in CELLview (Greiner Bio-One International GmbH, Kremsmünster, Austria). They were fixed with methanol for the detection of intracellular proteins or Image-iT Fixative Solution (methanol-free 4% formaldehyde; Invitrogen, Thermo Fisher Scientific) for the detection of membrane proteins. Specific primary antibodies were added to the wells and incubated overnight at 4°C (Table 1). The day after, the wells were washed and incubated with the appropriate secondary antibodies. Nuclei were counterstained with NucBlue when mounting slides with ProLong Glass Antifade Mountant (Invitrogen, Thermo Fisher Scientific). Fluorescence was examined on an AxioImager microscope combined with ApoTome (Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany) or on an LSM 800 confocal microscope (Zeiss). Acquisition parameters and color histograms were kept similar between conditions.

Tissue Staining Quantification

Expression of ACE2 and TMPRSS2 during pregnancy was quantified by IHC in retrospectively collected formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded placentas from 2017. This study was approved by the Ethical Committee of the Catholic University of Louvain (approval number 2018/23OCT/397) and with the consent of the patients. Samples were retrieved from spontaneous abortion (before 22 weeks), uncomplicated preterm pregnancies (before 37 weeks of gestation), and term pregnancies (between 37 and 41 weeks of gestation). According to the institutional procedure, all of the collected cases were analyzed by a pathologist and diagnosed as nonpathologic. Histologic slides from recruited placentas were incubated with primary antibodies overnight at 4°C (Table 1). Immunohistochemical reactions were visualized with the EnVision+ System (Dako, Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA), which is a horseradish peroxidase–labeled polymer conjugated with secondary antibodies. Sites of binding were revealed by treatment with diaminobenzidine (Dako, Agilent Technologies). Kidney (ACE2-positive) or prostate adenocarcinoma (TMPRSS2-positive) tissue sections were used as positive controls, whereas negative controls consisted of slides incubated with secondary antibodies alone. Stained slides were digitalized using an SCN400 slide scanner (Leica Biosystems, Wetzlar, Germany) at ×20 magnification. Scanned slides were analyzed by the image analysis tool author version 2017.2 (Visiopharm, Hoersholm, Denmark), following the workflow described in Supplemental Figure S5.

Statistical Analysis

All graphs show means ± SEMs, and the tables show means ± SDs. Statistical analyses were performed on GraphPad Prism 8 (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA), using t-test or one-way analysis of variance, followed by the Dunnett post-hoc test. P < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. Each in vitro experiment was repeated three times (N = 3 human placentas) in technical duplicates (n = 6). Quantification of ACE2 and TMPRSS2 by IHC was performed on three random fields from 35 placentas (N = 35 placentas) with technical triplicates (n = 105).

Results

Reassuring Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes in COVID-19 Pregnancies at Term

Thirty-one pregnant women who delivered after 22 weeks and who were tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 during their pregnancy were included in the study. Maternal and fetal characteristics are described in Table 3 . Gestational age was estimated from the first day of the last menstrual period and confirmed by first-trimester ultrasound examination. Twenty-seven patients tested positive during their third trimester, mainly the week before childbirth. Of these patients, 18 were asymptomatic, five had mild symptoms (fatigue, anosmia, or ageusia), and four had moderate symptoms, including fever and dyspnea. In most cases, the pregnancy ended without complications, and the mothers gave birth to healthy neonates. Four patients tested positive before 30 weeks of gestation. The first one had fever associated to dyspnea. She was diagnosed at 26 weeks 3 days of gestation and gave birth prematurely by cesarean section because of severe preeclampsia. The baby was growth-restricted and tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 by reverse transcriptase PCR, but 7 days after birth. The second patient was tested at 28 weeks 6 days of gestation. She was hospitalized in the intensive care unit for 14 days for severe respiratory distress, but was able to give birth at term without complications. The third patient tested positive at 23 weeks 3 days of gestation because of dyspnea. She delivered a viable polymalformed newborn (esophageal atresia, anal imperforation, Fallot tetralogy, and multicystic kidney) at 33 weeks 1 day. The CHARGE syndrome (coloboma, heart defects, choanal atresia, retardation of growth and/or development, genitourinary malformation, and ear abnormalities and/or deafness) was excluded by genomic analysis, but the malformations remained compatible with a VACTERL association (vertebral defects, anal atresia, cardiac defects, tracheo-esophageal fistula, renal anomalies, and limb abnormalities). The last patient was referred to obstetrical emergency at 25 weeks 2 days for a fever peak at 39°C, decreased fetal movements, and ultrasonographic signs of fetal distress. A diagnosis of intrauterine fetal demise was made on admission. A positive nasopharyngeal swab of the mother confirmed the medical history, which was compatible with a COVID-19 infection contracted a few days ago.
Table 3

Maternal and Fetal Characteristics

CharacteristicValue
Mother
 Age, years31 (4.28)
 BMI, kg/m225.18 (5.53)
 >30 kg/m2, %12.90
 Ethnic group, %
 White48.39
 Black22.58
 Asian0
 Other29.03
 Primiparity, %41.94
 Pregnancy and labor
 Complications, %
 PE6.45
 Gestational diabetes9.68
 Placental abruption3.23
 Cesarean section, %
 Elective or breech35.48
 Emergency (fetal distress)12.9
Fetus
 Weight
 Mean, g3190 (851.72)
 <5th percentile, %12.90
 Sex, % male48.39
 Gestational age
 Mean, weeks.day38.1
 <34 Weeks, %6.45
 Neonatal outcomes, %
 Apgar at 5 minutes <86.45
 Neonatal infection12.90
 Intrauterine death3.23
 Malformations3.23
COVID-19 history
 Positive test, %
 Before 30 weeks12.90
 <10 Days before delivery70.97
 Symptoms, %
 Asymptomatic61.29
 Mild (fatigue, anosmia, or ageusia)19.35
 Moderate (fever, cough, or dyspnea)16.13
 Hospitalization for respiratory distress3.23

Data are presented as means (SD), unless otherwise indicated.

BMI, body mass index; PE, preeclampsia.

Maternal and Fetal Characteristics Data are presented as means (SD), unless otherwise indicated. BMI, body mass index; PE, preeclampsia.

Maternal SARS-CoV-2 IgG Antibodies Are Transferred to the Fetus

Additional samples were available for the first 12 patients in our cohort (Table 4 ). The virus was detected only in the maternal plasma of the intensive care unit patient during her hospitalization. All patients gave birth to healthy babies at term, and none of the babies tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 by reverse transcriptase PCR on a nasopharyngeal swab performed just after delivery. Several mothers in our cohort had SARS-CoV-2 IgM and/or IgG, but their newborns only had IgG, suggesting passive antibody transfer across the placenta.
Table 4

Detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in Various Biological Fluids and Quantification of Anti–SARS-CoV-2 Antibodies in Maternal and Fetal Plasma Samples

Patient no.COVID-19 positive <10 daysMaternal plasmaFetal plasmaVaginal swabRectal swabMaternal urineFetal urineMaternal milkMaternal IgM/IgGFetal NP swabFetal urineFetal IgM/IgG
1N/AN/AN/AN/AN/A0/28.98N/A0/16.33
2+N/AN/AN/AN/AN/A0/0N/A0/0
3+0/00/0
4+0/00/0
5+0/00/0
6+0/00/0
7+1.15/33.110/46.17
8+N/A1.36/49.580/52.52
9+0/00/0
100/00/0
11+0/00/0
12+N/A0/5.02N/A0/15.11

+, Positive reverse transcriptase PCR; −, negative reverse transcriptase PCR; N/A, not applicable because of unavailable samples; NP, nasopharyngeal.

IgM and IgG results are expressed as arbitrary units per milliliter.

Detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in Various Biological Fluids and Quantification of Anti–SARS-CoV-2 Antibodies in Maternal and Fetal Plasma Samples +, Positive reverse transcriptase PCR; −, negative reverse transcriptase PCR; N/A, not applicable because of unavailable samples; NP, nasopharyngeal. IgM and IgG results are expressed as arbitrary units per milliliter.

Analysis of the Placentas Retrieved from SARS-CoV-2 Patients

A studied piece of placenta and the amniotic membrane from all patients were available for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 by reverse transcriptase PCR (Table 5 ). The placenta from the intrauterine death was highly positive (CT, around 15), whereas three placentas were at the limit of detection (CT, around 40). Localization of the virus was further confirmed by IHC and ISH. The nucleocapsid (Figure 1 A) and the viral RNA (Figure 1B) were detected only in the syncytium of the demised fetus.
Table 5

Analysis of the 31 Placentas from COVID-19 Patients

VariableValue
Macroscopy
 Weight
 Mean, g460.16 (132.52)
 <10th percentile, %21.43
 Umbilical cord
 Diameter, mm13.41 (3.99)
 Velamentous insertion, %3.23
 Observations, %
 Infarct19.35
 Thrombohematoma16.13
 Retroplacental hematoma9.68
Microscopy, %
 Maternal vascular malperfusion
 Distal villous hypoplasia16.13
 Decidual arteriopathy3.23
 Villous hypermaturity6.45
 Nuclear clusters35.48
 Fibrin deposits38.71
 Chronic histiocytic intervillositis9.68
 Chorioamnionitis
 Focal16.13
 Diffuse6.45
 With fetal response3.23
 Choriangiomatosis16.13
 Parabasal calcifications35.48
SARS-CoV-2 detection, %
 Reverse transcriptase PCR16.13
 Immunohistochemistry3.23
 In situ hybridization3.23

Data are presented as means (SD), unless otherwise indicated.

Figure 1

SARS-CoV-2 can infect preterm placenta and induce diffuse subacute intervillitis. A: The SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid was visualized in the syncytium by immunostaining (brown), at low (left panel) and high (right panel) magnification factor. B: Immunostaining was confirmed by in situ hybridization (red dots), at low (left panel) and high (right panel) magnification factor. C: Confirmation of chronic histiocytic intervillositis by immunostaining (brown) of CD3, a marker of T lymphocytes (left panel), and CD68, a marker of macrophages (right panel). Images are representative of the whole tissue section. Scale bars: 200 μm (A and B, left panels, and C, left and right panels); 50 μm (A and B, right panels).

Analysis of the 31 Placentas from COVID-19 Patients Data are presented as means (SD), unless otherwise indicated. SARS-CoV-2 can infect preterm placenta and induce diffuse subacute intervillitis. A: The SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid was visualized in the syncytium by immunostaining (brown), at low (left panel) and high (right panel) magnification factor. B: Immunostaining was confirmed by in situ hybridization (red dots), at low (left panel) and high (right panel) magnification factor. C: Confirmation of chronic histiocytic intervillositis by immunostaining (brown) of CD3, a marker of T lymphocytes (left panel), and CD68, a marker of macrophages (right panel). Images are representative of the whole tissue section. Scale bars: 200 μm (A and B, left panels, and C, left and right panels); 50 μm (A and B, right panels). Although analysis of the 31 placentas did not reveal any specific histologic pattern, six cases showed different signs of maternal vascular malperfusion, as per the Amsterdam consensus. Besides, chronic histiocytic intervillositis was diagnosed in three placentas, including the SARS-CoV-2–positive placenta, in which the presence of lymphocytes and macrophages in the intervillous space was confirmed by CD3 and CD68 immunostaining, respectively (Figure 1C). Focal or diffuse chorioamnionitis was observed in eight placentas. However, the medical significance of these diagnostics is uncertain as they were not clearly associated with maternal symptoms or neonatal infection. Regarding the intrauterine demise case, autopsy did not reveal any sign of systemic infection as the histology of the organs was normal. However, a diagnosis of pneumonia could not be excluded because of the presence of polynuclear neutrophils in the alveoli. No SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid and RNA were detected by IHC and ISH in lung, kidney, heart, intestinal tract, thyroid, spleen, liver, pancreas, testes, cerebellum, or eye tissues (Supplemental Figure S6).

Trophoblasts Are Not Susceptible to Infection by SARS-CoV-2

As placenta at term constitutes a natural barrier against the maternal pathogens, our hypothesis was that the trophoblasts were not susceptible to SARS-CoV-2 infection, regardless of their state of differentiation. To test this hypothesis, we first isolated mononuclear CTBs from human placentas at term and differentiated them in vitro. Forty-eight hours after isolation, the cells started expressing chorionic gonadotrophin chain β (CGB) mRNA (Figure 2 A) and secreting a high amount of free β human chorionic gonadotropin in the supernatant (Figure 2B). In addition, plurinuclear cells expressing cytokeratin 7 were visualized, suggesting an adequate differentiation of the cells (Figure 2C).
Figure 2

Primary human trophoblasts at term are resistant to SARS-CoV-2 infection. A: Primary human cytotrophoblasts (CTBs) were fully differentiated into syncytiotrophoblasts (STBs) after 4 days of culture, as illustrated by an exponential increase in human chorionic gonadotrophin expression (CGB). B: This was confirmed by measuring free β human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) in the supernatant by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. C: Multinucleated syncytiotrophoblasts expressing cytokeratin 7 were visualized after 4 days in culture (nuclei in blue, cell membranes in green, and cytokeratin 7 in red). D: Primary CTBs and STBs were exposed to SARS-CoV-2 and fixed with methanol 4 days later. Top panels: Vero E6 cells were used as positive control, whereas negative control consisted of unexposed cells. The viral nucleocapsid was observed only in Vero E6 cells (nuclei in blue and viral nucleocapsid in red; middle left panel), whereas the secondary antibody alone was specific (bottom panels). The experiments were repeated three times in duplicates. Images are representative of each condition, and acquisition parameters/histograms are similar between images. All data are shown as means ± SEM (A and B). n = 3 human placentas (A–D); n = 6 for data in duplicates (A and B). ∗∗∗P < 0.001 versus first column (by t-test). Scale bar = 20 μm (C and D).

Primary human trophoblasts at term are resistant to SARS-CoV-2 infection. A: Primary human cytotrophoblasts (CTBs) were fully differentiated into syncytiotrophoblasts (STBs) after 4 days of culture, as illustrated by an exponential increase in human chorionic gonadotrophin expression (CGB). B: This was confirmed by measuring free β human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) in the supernatant by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. C: Multinucleated syncytiotrophoblasts expressing cytokeratin 7 were visualized after 4 days in culture (nuclei in blue, cell membranes in green, and cytokeratin 7 in red). D: Primary CTBs and STBs were exposed to SARS-CoV-2 and fixed with methanol 4 days later. Top panels: Vero E6 cells were used as positive control, whereas negative control consisted of unexposed cells. The viral nucleocapsid was observed only in Vero E6 cells (nuclei in blue and viral nucleocapsid in red; middle left panel), whereas the secondary antibody alone was specific (bottom panels). The experiments were repeated three times in duplicates. Images are representative of each condition, and acquisition parameters/histograms are similar between images. All data are shown as means ± SEM (A and B). n = 3 human placentas (A–D); n = 6 for data in duplicates (A and B). ∗∗∗P < 0.001 versus first column (by t-test). Scale bar = 20 μm (C and D). To assess their vulnerability to SARS-CoV-2 infection, undifferentiated (CTB, 48 hours after isolation) and differentiated (STB, 96 hours after isolation) trophoblasts were exposed to increasing amounts of SARS-CoV-2 virions in the medium. Four days after, viral antigens or RNA was not detected in the culture media. On the other hand Vero E6 cells, known to be vulnerable to SARS-CoV-2, were infected and released a high number of viruses in the supernatant. This finding was further confirmed by the presence of the nucleocapsid of the virus in the cytoplasm of Vero E6, but not in primary trophoblasts by immunofluorescence (Figure 2D). As expected, the cytopathic effects were obvious in the infected Vero E6, whereas there was no difference between the infected trophoblast cultures and controls (Supplemental Figure S7).

Trophoblasts Poorly Co-Express ACE2 and TMPRSS2 at Term

As mentioned, combined ACE2 and TMPRSS2 expression at the cell surface could be considered as a biological indicator of susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2 infection. Compared with lung and kidney tissues, the placenta at term expressed ACE2 moderately (Supplemental Figure S8A) but not TMPRSS2 (Supplemental Figure S8B). Computer-assisted quantification demonstrated that ACE2 expression in placentas from different gestational ages decreased from the second trimester to term (Figure 3 , A–D), whereas TMPRSS2 expression almost disappeared after 15 weeks of gestation (Figure 3, E–H). High-magnification analysis of the placentas at term showed that ACE2 was expressed at the apical and the basolateral poles of STBs (Figure 4 A), whereas TMPRSS2 was only expressed by CTBs (Figure 4B). This finding was further confirmed by quantitative real-time PCR and Western blot analysis in our primary cell cultures: CTBs expressed TMPRSS2, whereas the STBs highly expressed ACE2 (Figure 4, C and D).
Figure 3

The co-expression of SARS-CoV-2 host membrane receptors angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) and transmembrane protease serine 2 (TMPRSS2) is low after 30 weeks of gestation. A: Expression of ACE2 at different gestational ages is quantified with computer assistance. The histologic score (H-score) demonstrates that ACE2 expression is particularly high before 30 weeks of gestation, even if a certain degree of interindividual variability is observed. B: Representative images of ACE2 staining. First-trimester placenta from spontaneous abortion. C: Second-trimester placenta from uncomplicated preterm delivery. D: Placentas at term from uncomplicated pregnancy. E: Same as A, but for TMPRSS2. The general H-score is lower than for ACE2 and drastically decreases after 15 weeks of gestation. F: Representative images of TMPRSS2 staining. First-trimester placenta from spontaneous abortion. G: Second-trimester placenta from uncomplicated preterm delivery. H: Placenta at term from uncomplicated pregnancy. Images are representative of the whole tissue section. Computer-assisted quantification was performed on three random fields from 35 placentas in triplicates. n = 35 placentas (A and E); n = 105 for data in triplicates (A and E). Scale bar = 100 μm (B–D and F–H).

Figure 4

The syncytium at term highly expresses angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) but not transmembrane protease serine 2 (TMPRSS2). A: Immunostaining of ACE2 visualized in the villi at term at high magnification. The staining is mainly localized in the multinucleated syncytiotrophoblasts (STBs), both at the apical and the basolateral poles (full arrows), whereas the mononucleated cytotrophoblasts (CTBs) are negative (discontinuous arrow). B: Immunostaining of TMPRSS2 visualized in the villi at term at high magnification. STBs are negative (full arrow), whereas CTBs are weakly positive (discontinuous arrow). C: Expression of ACE2 is determined in CTBs and STBs by quantitative real-time PCR and Western blot analysis. As observed by immunohistochemistry, CTBs poorly express ACE2, whereas STBs are highly positive. D: Same as B, but for TMPRSS2. Unlike ACE2, TMPRSS2 was moderately expressed by CTBs but not by STBs. Experiments were repeated three times in duplicates. Images are representative of the whole tissue section. All data are shown as means ± SEM (C and D). n = 3 human placentas (C and D); n = 6 for data in duplicates (C and D). ∗P < 0.05, ∗∗P < 0.01 versus first column (by t-test). Scale bar = 40 μm (A and B). Original magnification, ×400 (A). GAPDH, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase.

The co-expression of SARS-CoV-2 host membrane receptors angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) and transmembrane protease serine 2 (TMPRSS2) is low after 30 weeks of gestation. A: Expression of ACE2 at different gestational ages is quantified with computer assistance. The histologic score (H-score) demonstrates that ACE2 expression is particularly high before 30 weeks of gestation, even if a certain degree of interindividual variability is observed. B: Representative images of ACE2 staining. First-trimester placenta from spontaneous abortion. C: Second-trimester placenta from uncomplicated preterm delivery. D: Placentas at term from uncomplicated pregnancy. E: Same as A, but for TMPRSS2. The general H-score is lower than for ACE2 and drastically decreases after 15 weeks of gestation. F: Representative images of TMPRSS2 staining. First-trimester placenta from spontaneous abortion. G: Second-trimester placenta from uncomplicated preterm delivery. H: Placenta at term from uncomplicated pregnancy. Images are representative of the whole tissue section. Computer-assisted quantification was performed on three random fields from 35 placentas in triplicates. n = 35 placentas (A and E); n = 105 for data in triplicates (A and E). Scale bar = 100 μm (B–D and F–H). The syncytium at term highly expresses angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) but not transmembrane protease serine 2 (TMPRSS2). A: Immunostaining of ACE2 visualized in the villi at term at high magnification. The staining is mainly localized in the multinucleated syncytiotrophoblasts (STBs), both at the apical and the basolateral poles (full arrows), whereas the mononucleated cytotrophoblasts (CTBs) are negative (discontinuous arrow). B: Immunostaining of TMPRSS2 visualized in the villi at term at high magnification. STBs are negative (full arrow), whereas CTBs are weakly positive (discontinuous arrow). C: Expression of ACE2 is determined in CTBs and STBs by quantitative real-time PCR and Western blot analysis. As observed by immunohistochemistry, CTBs poorly express ACE2, whereas STBs are highly positive. D: Same as B, but for TMPRSS2. Unlike ACE2, TMPRSS2 was moderately expressed by CTBs but not by STBs. Experiments were repeated three times in duplicates. Images are representative of the whole tissue section. All data are shown as means ± SEM (C and D). n = 3 human placentas (C and D); n = 6 for data in duplicates (C and D). ∗P < 0.05, ∗∗P < 0.01 versus first column (by t-test). Scale bar = 40 μm (A and B). Original magnification, ×400 (A). GAPDH, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase.

Induction of TMPRSS2 Expression by Syncytiotrophoblasts Is Not Sufficient to Allow SARS-CoV-2 Entry and Replication

Given expressional observations, we envisioned that the syncytium at term was protected from SARS-CoV-2 infection because of the absence of TMPRSS2 at its surface. To confirm this hypothesis, differentiated STBs were transfected with an expression vector of TMPRSS2 48 hours before exposure to SARS-CoV-2 virions. TMPRSS2 expression was verified by quantitative real-time PCR (Figure 5 A) and Western blot analysis (Figure 5B), whereas its localization was specified by immunofluorescence (Figure 5C) before adding viral particles to the culture medium. Surprisingly, SARS-CoV-2 could not be detected in the supernatant by reverse transcriptase PCR nor in the cells by immunofluorescence (Figure 5D), suggesting that transient expression of TMPRSS2 is not sufficient to allow the entry of the virus or its replication in differentiated trophoblasts.
Figure 5

The transient expression of transmembrane protease serine 2 (TMPRSS2) in the syncytiotrophoblasts (STBs) is not sufficient to allow SARS-CoV-2 entry and replication. A: Primary human cytotrophoblasts were transfected 48 hours after differentiation with an empty vector (control) or a vector expressing TMPRSS2. A and B: Before exposure to SARS-CoV-2, expression of TMPRSS2 was assessed by quantitative real-time PCR (A) and Western blot analysis (B). C: Localization of the protein is shown by immunofluorescence (nuclei in blue and TMPRSS2 in green). D: Control STBs and pTMPRSS2-transfected STBs were exposed to SARS-CoV-2 and fixed with methanol 4 days later. Top panels: Vero E6 cells were used as positive control, whereas negative control consisted of unexposed cells. Bottom left panel: The viral nucleocapsid was observed only in Vero E6 cells (nuclei in blue and viral nucleocapsid in red). The experiments were repeated three times in duplicates. Images are representative of each condition, and acquisition parameters/color histograms were kept similar. All data are shown as means ± SEM (A). n = 3 human placentas (A–D); n = 6 for data in duplicates (A). ∗∗P < 0.01 versus first column (by t-test). Scale bar = 100 μm (C and D). GAPDH, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase.

The transient expression of transmembrane protease serine 2 (TMPRSS2) in the syncytiotrophoblasts (STBs) is not sufficient to allow SARS-CoV-2 entry and replication. A: Primary human cytotrophoblasts were transfected 48 hours after differentiation with an empty vector (control) or a vector expressing TMPRSS2. A and B: Before exposure to SARS-CoV-2, expression of TMPRSS2 was assessed by quantitative real-time PCR (A) and Western blot analysis (B). C: Localization of the protein is shown by immunofluorescence (nuclei in blue and TMPRSS2 in green). D: Control STBs and pTMPRSS2-transfected STBs were exposed to SARS-CoV-2 and fixed with methanol 4 days later. Top panels: Vero E6 cells were used as positive control, whereas negative control consisted of unexposed cells. Bottom left panel: The viral nucleocapsid was observed only in Vero E6 cells (nuclei in blue and viral nucleocapsid in red). The experiments were repeated three times in duplicates. Images are representative of each condition, and acquisition parameters/color histograms were kept similar. All data are shown as means ± SEM (A). n = 3 human placentas (A–D); n = 6 for data in duplicates (A). ∗∗P < 0.01 versus first column (by t-test). Scale bar = 100 μm (C and D). GAPDH, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase.

Discussion

Data from the present study confirmed that the vertical transmission of SARS-CoV-2 is a rare event, and does not usually occur around the term of a pregnancy. Analysis of the clinical samples showed that maternal infection does not easily spread to the fetus, but the consequences can be dramatic. Isolated cases of vertical transmission are regularly published, but their validity must be taken with caution because a pertinent diagnostic classification is rarely used. Indeed, most of the reported neonatal infections are only diagnosed by reverse transcriptase PCR on a nasopharyngeal swab without evidence of viral RNA in the fetal blood or in the amniotic fluid. Besides, the occurrence of intrauterine transplacental transmission should be based on the identification of SARS-CoV-2 in chorionic villi. Given that, what is the appropriate method of detection? On the one hand, several studies report the detection of SARS-CoV-2 in the placenta by reverse transcriptase PCR on RNA extracted from the whole tissue, or from a swab realized on the chorionic plate. This technique is nonspecific, as the sample can be contaminated by maternal cells and/or vaginal secretions in case of vaginal delivery. In the current cohort, three cases were weakly positive without confirmation by other methods. On the other hand, although proving the presence of viral proteins in the placenta by IHC would have been a practical technique, most anti–SARS-CoV-2 antibodies developed for immunostaining lack specificity in practice. For instance, the anti-spike antibodies had to be excluded of the study as they showed specificity problems (Supplemental Figures S1 and S2). Yet, the anti-nucleocapsid antibody showed a higher specificity (Supplemental Figure S3). It is therefore difficult to trust findings based on one antibody alone. In this context, ISH appears to be the solution, but its implementation is limited because it requires specific expertise, a substantial budget, and good-quality samples. Finally, a few studies localized viral particles in the syncytium by electron microscopy. , Although interesting, these observations have been controversial because of the difficulty in distinguishing viral particles from cellular components. , Like immunostaining, electron microscopy should be used in combination with other methods, including the histologic diagnosis. Isolated cases of positive placentas identified by IHC and/or ISH have been reported. , All of the infected placentas were characterized by the prominent positivity of STBs for SARS-CoV-2, an unusual chronic histiocytic intervillositis, and syncytial necrosis. Conversely, the uninfected placentas showed significant variability in the spectrum of pathology findings, in spite of the maternal vascular malperfusion features being preferentially associated with adverse outcomes. As observed in our cohort, direct interactions between SARS-CoV-2 and STBs are possible in vivo. For this reason, undifferentiated and differentiated trophoblasts were directly exposed to different concentrations of SARS-CoV-2 virions. These concentrations were much higher than observed in the blood of the hospitalized patient (<105 copies/mL). This set of data is unprecedented, as primary cells isolated from human placentas at term were cultured with real viral particles for the first time. Only one publication has shown that SARS-CoV-2 pseudovirus can eventually enter CTBs, but neither the localization nor the replication of the virus has been studied. By contrast, the current experiments clearly demonstrated that term trophoblasts, irrespective of their state of differentiation, are resistant to SARS-CoV-2 infection. The resistance is speculated to be conferred by the low co-expression of ACE2 and TMPRSS2 by STBs. In this study, the findings from single-cell RNA-sequencing data were confirmed, and the expression of ACE2 and TMPRSS2 in the syncytial area was reliably quantified over the weeks of gestation. , In addition to low TMPRSS2 expression by the syncytium, a polarized pattern of ACE2 with the highest expression on the stromal side of the STBs has been suggested. However, in the current study, the immunostaining was both localized on the basolateral and the apical sides of the syncytium. Additionally, immunostaining of ACE2 and TMPRSS2 did not appear stronger than in the infected placenta of similar gestational age (Supplemental Figure S9). To assess the essential role of TMPRSS2 for viral entry, its transient expression was induced in fully differentiated trophoblasts, which were exposed to SARS-CoV-2. Surprisingly, expressing the isoform 1 of TMPRSS2 was not sufficient to lead to the infection of the cells. Even if the expression is confirmed by different techniques, it is difficult to prove that the produced protein is fully functional and localizes at the membrane. For instance, alternative splicing could explain the inability of the expressed TMPRSS2 to prime the spike protein. Interestingly, TMPRSS2 transcription is under androgen regulation, and androgen receptor inhibitors were found to be protective against SARS-CoV-2 infection. , As progesterone has anti-androgenic effects, the high production of progesterone by the syncytium could also explain the natural protection of the placenta against the virus. It is important to acknowledge that the role of TMPRSS2 has been highlighted by knockdown or overexpression techniques in already infectable cells, including enterocytes or Vero E6 cells. , Besides, recent studies indicate the existence of other proteases and host factors required to permit SARS-CoV-2 entry.53, 54, 55 Therefore, it is important to admit that the entry processes by which SARS-CoV-2 infects human cells are far more complex than initially hypothesized, and do not depend only on the co-expression of ACE2 and TMPRSS2. Lastly, even if vertical transmission does occur, described immunomodulatory mechanisms used by the placenta may mitigate the transmission of the virus to the fetus. , The current study combined clinical and in vitro evidence about placental infection by SARS-CoV-2. To the best of our knowledge, it is the first reported case of intrauterine fetal death associated with maternal COVID-19 positivity and documented infection of the placenta. A robust model of trophoblast isolation and differentiation method demonstrated that a low co-expression of ACE2 and TMPRSS2 at the surface of the syncytium alone is not sufficient to explain the resistance of the placenta against SARS-CoV2 at term. To conclude, this work emphasizes the need for further explorations of the vertical transmission of SARS-CoV-2 during pregnancy and the systematic screening for the virus in case of neonatal infection.
  52 in total

1.  SARS-CoV-2 infection of the placenta.

Authors:  Hillary Hosier; Shelli F Farhadian; Raffaella A Morotti; Uma Deshmukh; Alice Lu-Culligan; Katherine H Campbell; Yuki Yasumoto; Chantal Bf Vogels; Arnau Casanovas-Massana; Pavithra Vijayakumar; Bertie Geng; Camila D Odio; John Fournier; Anderson F Brito; Joseph R Fauver; Feimei Liu; Tara Alpert; Reshef Tal; Klara Szigeti-Buck; Sudhir Perincheri; Christopher Larsen; Aileen M Gariepy; Gabriela Aguilar; Kristen L Fardelmann; Malini Harigopal; Hugh S Taylor; Christian M Pettker; Anne L Wyllie; Charles Dela Cruz; Aaron M Ring; Nathan D Grubaugh; Albert I Ko; Tamas L Horvath; Akiko Iwasaki; Uma M Reddy; Heather S Lipkind
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 14.808

2.  Expression of ACE and ACE2 in individuals with diabetic kidney disease and healthy controls.

Authors:  Sonoo Mizuiri; Hiromichi Hemmi; Michitsune Arita; Yasushi Ohashi; Yoshihide Tanaka; Moriatsu Miyagi; Ken Sakai; Yukio Ishikawa; Kazutoshi Shibuya; Hiroki Hase; Atsushi Aikawa
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2008-03-04       Impact factor: 8.860

3.  Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes Among Individuals With and Without Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2): A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Benjamin J F Huntley; Isabelle A Mulder; Daniele Di Mascio; William S Vintzileos; Anthony M Vintzileos; Vincenzo Berghella; Suneet P Chauhan
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 7.661

4.  COVID-19 in a 26-week preterm neonate.

Authors:  Fiammetta Piersigilli; Katherine Carkeek; Catheline Hocq; Bénédicte van Grambezen; Corinne Hubinont; Olga Chatzis; Dimitri Van der Linden; Olivier Danhaive
Journal:  Lancet Child Adolesc Health       Date:  2020-05-07

5.  Does the human placenta express the canonical cell entry mediators for SARS-CoV-2?

Authors:  Roger Pique-Regi; Roberto Romero; Adi L Tarca; Francesca Luca; Yi Xu; Adnan Alazizi; Yaozhu Leng; Chaur-Dong Hsu; Nardhy Gomez-Lopez
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-07-14       Impact factor: 8.140

Review 6.  Factors preventing materno-fetal transmission of SARS-CoV-2.

Authors:  Onder Celik; Aylin Saglam; Bora Baysal; Iris E Derwig; Nilufer Celik; Mehmet Ak; Selma N Aslan; Mustafa Ulas; Aynur Ersahin; Ahter T Tayyar; Bulent Duran; Suleyman Aydin
Journal:  Placenta       Date:  2020-05-29       Impact factor: 3.481

7.  Synthesis and systematic review of reported neonatal SARS-CoV-2 infections.

Authors:  Roberto Raschetti; Alexandre J Vivanti; Christelle Vauloup-Fellous; Barbara Loi; Alexandra Benachi; Daniele De Luca
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2020-10-15       Impact factor: 14.919

8.  Vertical transmission of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2: A scoping review.

Authors:  Lemi Belay Tolu; Alex Ezeh; Garumma Tolu Feyissa
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-04-22       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Third-trimester placentas of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)-positive women: histomorphology, including viral immunohistochemistry and in-situ hybridization.

Authors:  Marie C Smithgall; Xiaolin Liu-Jarin; Diane Hamele-Bena; Adela Cimic; Mirella Mourad; Larisa Debelenko; Xiaowei Chen
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  2020-09-26       Impact factor: 7.778

View more
  9 in total

1.  Multisystem inflammatory syndrome in neonates (MIS-N) associated with SARS-CoV2 infection: a case series.

Authors:  Kiran More; Sheila Aiyer; Ashish Goti; Manan Parikh; Samir Sheikh; Gaurav Patel; Venkat Kallem; Roopali Soni; Praveen Kumar
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2022-01-14       Impact factor: 3.860

Review 2.  Cellular Complexity of Hemochorial Placenta: Stem Cell Populations, Insights from scRNA-seq, and SARS-CoV-2 Susceptibility.

Authors:  Christopher S Mallery; Maira Carrillo; Ariel Mei; Ana Correia-Branco; Olga Kashpur; Mary C Wallingford
Journal:  Curr Stem Cell Rep       Date:  2021-10-20

3.  Meta-analysis on COVID-19-pregnancy-related placental pathologies shows no specific pattern.

Authors:  Jan-Theile Suhren; Andre Meinardus; Kais Hussein; Nora Schaumann
Journal:  Placenta       Date:  2021-10-19       Impact factor: 3.481

4.  Maternal-Fetal Implications of SARS CoV-2 Infection during Pregnancy, Viral, Serological Analyses of Placenta and Cord Blood.

Authors:  Souhail Alouini; Jerôme Guinard; Olivier Belin; Louis Mesnard; Evelyne Werner; Thierry Prazuck; Chantal Pichon
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-02-13       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 5.  The risk of intrauterine exposure to SARS-CoV-2 in female COVID-19 patients: A comprehensive review.

Authors:  Guo-Hua Zhu; Lu Liu; Xi-Xi Huang; Da-Jin Li; Yi-Zhun Zhu; Xin Lu; Mei-Rong Du
Journal:  Am J Reprod Immunol       Date:  2022-02-11       Impact factor: 3.777

6.  SARS-CoV-2 positivity in offspring and timing of mother-to-child transmission: living systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  John Allotey; Shaunak Chatterjee; Tania Kew; Andrea Gaetano; Elena Stallings; Silvia Fernández-García; Magnus Yap; Jameela Sheikh; Heidi Lawson; Dyuti Coomar; Anushka Dixit; Dengyi Zhou; Rishab Balaji; Megan Littmoden; Yasmin King; Luke Debenham; Anna Clavé Llavall; Kehkashan Ansari; Gurimaan Sandhu; Adeolu Banjoko; Kate Walker; Keelin O'Donoghue; Madelon van Wely; Elizabeth van Leeuwen; Elena Kostova; Heinke Kunst; Asma Khalil; Vanessa Brizuela; Nathalie Broutet; Edna Kara; Caron Rahn Kim; Anna Thorson; Olufemi T Oladapo; Javier Zamora; Mercedes Bonet; Lynne Mofenson; Shakila Thangaratinam
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2022-03-16

7.  Restriction of SARS-CoV-2 replication in the human placenta.

Authors:  Kazuhide Takada; Sayaka Shimodai-Yamada; Mayumi Suzuki; Quang Duy Trinh; Chika Takano; Kaori Kawakami; Mikiko Asai-Sato; Atsushi Komatsu; Aya Okahashi; Nobuhiko Nagano; Toshiya Misawa; Kyohei Yamaguchi; Tadaki Suzuki; Kei Kawana; Ichiro Morioka; Hideto Yamada; Satoshi Hayakawa; Hiroyuki Hao; Shihoko Komine-Aizawa
Journal:  Placenta       Date:  2022-07-19       Impact factor: 3.287

8.  Fetoplacental transmission and placental response to SARS-CoV-2: Evidence from the literature.

Authors:  Henry C Ezechukwu; Jiahua Shi; Muinah A Fowora; Cornelius A Diya; Faiz Elfaki; Oyelola A Adegboye
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-08-16

9.  A standardized definition of placental infection by SARS-CoV-2, a consensus statement from the National Institutes of Health/Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development SARS-CoV-2 Placental Infection Workshop.

Authors:  Drucilla J Roberts; Andrea G Edlow; Roberto J Romero; Carolyn B Coyne; David T Ting; Jason L Hornick; Sherif R Zaki; Upasana Das Adhikari; Lena Serghides; Stephanie L Gaw; Torri D Metz
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2021-08-05       Impact factor: 8.661

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.