Literature DB >> 34111405

Changing trends in Black-White racial differences in surgical menopause: a population-based study.

Maya A Wright1, Kemi M Doll2, Evan Myers3, William R Carpenter4, Danielle R Gartner5, Whitney R Robinson6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Bilateral oophorectomy before menopause, or surgical menopause, is associated with negative health outcomes, including an increased risk for stroke and other cardiovascular outcomes; however, surgical menopause also dramatically reduces ovarian cancer incidence and mortality rates. Because there are competing positive and negative sequelae associated with surgical menopause, clinical guidelines have not been definitive. Previous research indicates that White women have higher rates of surgical menopause than other racial groups. However, previous studies may have underestimated the rates of surgical menopause among Black women. Furthermore, clinical practice has changed dramatically in the past 15 years, and there are no population-based studies in which more recent data were used. Tracking actual racial differences among women with surgical menopause is important for ensuring equity in gynecologic care.
OBJECTIVE: This population-based surveillance study evaluated racial differences in the rates of surgical menopause in all inpatient and outpatient settings in a large, racially diverse US state with historically high rates of hysterectomy. STUDY
DESIGN: We evaluated all inpatient and outpatient surgeries in North Carolina from 2011 to 2014 for patients aged between 20 and 44 years. Surgical menopause was defined as a bilateral oophorectomy, with or without an accompanying hysterectomy, among North Carolina residents. International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, and Current Procedural Terminology codes were used to identify inpatient and outpatient procedures, respectively, and diagnostic indications. We estimated age-, race-, and ethnicity-specific rates of surgical menopause using county-specific population estimates based on the 2010 United States census. We used Poisson regression with deviance-adjusted residuals to estimate the incidence rate ratios in the entire state population. We tested changes in surgery rates over time (reference year, 2011), differences by setting (reference, inpatient), and differences by race and ethnicity (reference, non-Hispanic White). We then described the surgery rates between non-Hispanic White and non-Hispanic Black patients.
RESULTS: Between 2011 and 2014, 11,502 surgical menopause procedures for benign indications were performed in North Carolina among reproductive-aged residents. Most (95%) of these surgeries occurred concomitant with a hysterectomy. Over the 4-year study period, there was a 39% reduction in inpatient surgeries (incidence rate ratio, 0.61) and a 100% increase in outpatient surgeries (incidence rate ratio, 2.0). Restricting the analysis to surgeries among non-Hispanic White and Black patients, the increase in outpatient surgeries was significantly higher among non-Hispanic Black women (P<.01) for year-race interaction (reference, 2011 and non-Hispanic White). The overall rates of bilateral oophorectomy for non-Hispanic Black women rose more quickly than for non-Hispanic White women (P<.01). In 2011, the rate of surgical menopause was greater among White women than among Black women (17.7 vs 13.2 per 10,000 women). By 2014, the racial trends were reversed (rate, 24.8 per 10,000 for non-Hispanic White women and 28.4 per 10,000 for non-Hispanic Black women).
CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that the rates of surgical menopause increased in North Carolina in the early 2010s, especially among non-Hispanic Black women. By 2014, the rates of surgical menopause among non-Hispanic Black women had surpassed that of non-Hispanic White women. Given the long-term health consequences associated with surgical menopause, we propose potential drivers for the racially-patterned increases in the application of bilateral oophorectomy before the age of 45 years.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bilateral oophorectomy; health disparities; population-based; premenopausal

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34111405      PMCID: PMC9542172          DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.05.045

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   10.693


  20 in total

1.  Bilateral oophorectomy and premature menopause.

Authors:  Susan L Hendrix
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2005-12-19       Impact factor: 4.965

2.  Trends in Inpatient and Outpatient Hysterectomy and Oophorectomy Rates Among Commercially Insured Women in the United States, 2000-2014.

Authors:  Kemi M Doll; Stacie B Dusetzina; Whitney Robinson
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 14.766

3.  Comparison of female sexual function in women who underwent abdominal or vaginal hysterectomy with or without bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy.

Authors:  Melike Doğanay; Demet Kokanalı; Mahmut Kuntay Kokanalı; Sabri Cavkaytar; Orhan Seyfi Aksakal
Journal:  J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod       Date:  2018-11-13

4.  Removal of normal ovaries in women under age 51 at the time of hysterectomy.

Authors:  Natalie E Karp; Dee E Fenner; Lorraine Burgunder-Zdravkovski; Daniel M Morgan
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2015-05-29       Impact factor: 8.661

5.  Risk of cardiovascular disease by hysterectomy status, with and without oophorectomy: the Women's Health Initiative Observational Study.

Authors:  Barbara V Howard; Lewis Kuller; Robert Langer; JoAnn E Manson; Catherine Allen; Annlouise Assaf; Barbara B Cochrane; Joseph C Larson; Norman Lasser; Monique Rainford; Linda Van Horn; Marcia L Stefanick; Maurizio Trevisan
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2005-03-21       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 6.  Prophylactic oophorectomy: a historical perspective.

Authors:  Ornella Moscucci; Aileen Clarke
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 3.710

Review 7.  Salpingo-oophorectomy at the Time of Benign Hysterectomy: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Elizabeth Casiano Evans; Kristen A Matteson; Francisco J Orejuela; Marianna Alperin; Ethan M Balk; Sherif El-Nashar; Jonathan L Gleason; Cara Grimes; Peter Jeppson; Cara Mathews; Thomas L Wheeler; Miles Murphy
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 8.  Oophorectomy: the debate between ovarian conservation and elective oophorectomy.

Authors:  Elisabeth A Erekson; Deanna K Martin; Elena S Ratner
Journal:  Menopause       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 2.953

9.  Increased cardiovascular mortality after early bilateral oophorectomy.

Authors:  Cathleen M Rivera; Brandon R Grossardt; Deborah J Rhodes; Robert D Brown; Véronique L Roger; L Joseph Melton; Walter A Rocca
Journal:  Menopause       Date:  2009 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.953

10.  Factors associated with undergoing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy at the time of hysterectomy for benign conditions.

Authors:  Vanessa L Jacoby; Eric Vittinghoff; Sanae Nakagawa; Rebecca Jackson; Holly E Richter; John Chan; Miriam Kuppermann
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 7.661

View more
  2 in total

1.  Time Trends in Unilateral and Bilateral Oophorectomy in a Geographically Defined American Population.

Authors:  Zachary Erickson; Walter A Rocca; Carin Y Smith; Liliana Gazzuola Rocca; Elizabeth A Stewart; Shannon K Laughlin-Tommaso; Michelle M Mielke
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2022-04-05       Impact factor: 7.623

2.  Menopausal hormone therapy and risk of cardiovascular events in women with prediabetes or type 2 diabetes: A pooled analysis of 2917 postmenopausal women.

Authors:  Yilin Yoshida; Zhipeng Chen; Robin L Baudier; Marie Krousel-Wood; Amanda H Anderson; Vivian A Fonseca; Franck Mauvais-Jarvis
Journal:  Atherosclerosis       Date:  2022-01-22       Impact factor: 5.162

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.