Literature DB >> 15781742

Risk of cardiovascular disease by hysterectomy status, with and without oophorectomy: the Women's Health Initiative Observational Study.

Barbara V Howard1, Lewis Kuller, Robert Langer, JoAnn E Manson, Catherine Allen, Annlouise Assaf, Barbara B Cochrane, Joseph C Larson, Norman Lasser, Monique Rainford, Linda Van Horn, Marcia L Stefanick, Maurizio Trevisan.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in women and may vary by hysterectomy (or oophorectomy) status. This study compared CVD risk factors and rates between postmenopausal women who had and had not undergone hysterectomy, with or without oophorectomy. METHODS AND
RESULTS: This analysis was conducted on 89 914 women in the Women's Health Initiative (WHI) Observational Study. Participants reported demographic characteristics, medical history, dietary habits, physical activity, medications, and previous hysterectomy (with or without oophorectomy). Baseline weight, height, waist circumference, and blood pressure were measured. CVD events were ascertained during 5.1 years of mean follow-up and adjudicated with standard criteria. Black, Hispanic, and American Indian women had higher rates of hysterectomy than white women (52.9%, 44.6%, and 49.2% versus 40.0%, respectively), and Asian/Pacific Islander women had lower rates (33.8%). Women with a hysterectomy (regardless of oophorectomy status) had an adverse risk profile at baseline compared with women with no hysterectomy, including a higher proportion of hypertension, diabetes, high cholesterol, obesity, and lower education, income, and physical activity (all P<0.01). Total mortality and fatal and nonfatal CVD were higher among women with a hysterectomy. Hysterectomy (regardless of oophorectomy status) was a significant predictor of CVD (HR: 1.26, P<0.001). After adjustment for demographic variables and CVD risk factors, the effect was reduced and nonsignificant.
CONCLUSIONS: Women with a hysterectomy had a worse risk profile and higher prevalence and incidence of CVD in this cohort. Multivariate models suggest that hysterectomy is not the major determinant of this outcome; rather, CVD risk may be due to the more adverse initial risk profile of women who had undergone hysterectomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15781742     DOI: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000159344.21672.FD

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  64 in total

1.  Gynecological history in chronic fatigue syndrome: a population-based case-control study.

Authors:  Roumiana S Boneva; Elizabeth M Maloney; Jin-Mann Lin; James F Jones; Friedrich Wieser; Urs M Nater; Christine M Heim; William C Reeves
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2010-11-20       Impact factor: 2.681

2.  Reassessing hysterectomy.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Stewart; Lynne T Shuster; Walter A Rocca
Journal:  Minn Med       Date:  2012-03

Review 3.  Do differences in risk factors explain the lower rates of coronary heart disease in Japanese versus U.S. women?

Authors:  Akira Sekikawa; Bradley J Willcox; Takeshi Usui; John Jeffrey Carr; Emma J M Barinas-Mitchell; Kamal H Masaki; Makoto Watanabe; Russell P Tracy; Marianne H Bertolet; Rhobert W Evans; Kunihiko Nishimura; Kim Sutton-Tyrrell; Lewis H Kuller; Yoshihiro Miyamoto
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2013-09-28       Impact factor: 2.681

4.  Lipolytic signaling in response to acute exercise is altered in female mice following ovariectomy.

Authors:  Lindsay M Wohlers; Kathryn C Jackson; Espen E Spangenburg
Journal:  J Cell Biochem       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 4.429

Review 5.  The effects of oestrogens and their receptors on cardiometabolic health.

Authors:  Eugenia Morselli; Roberta S Santos; Alfredo Criollo; Michael D Nelson; Biff F Palmer; Deborah J Clegg
Journal:  Nat Rev Endocrinol       Date:  2017-03-17       Impact factor: 43.330

6.  Serial Studies in Subclinical Atherosclerosis During Menopausal Transition (from the Study of Women's Health Across the Nation).

Authors:  Zubair A Khan; Imke Janssen; Joanne K Mazzarelli; Lynda H Powell; Andrius Dumasius; Susan A Everson-Rose; Emma Barinas-Mitchell; Karen Matthews; Samar R El Khoudary; Perry J Weinstock; Steven M Hollenberg
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2018-07-04       Impact factor: 2.778

7.  Oophorectomy, hormone therapy, and subclinical coronary artery disease in women with hysterectomy: the Women's Health Initiative coronary artery calcium study.

Authors:  Matthew A Allison; Joann E Manson; Robert D Langer; J Jeffrey Carr; Jacques E Rossouw; Mary B Pettinger; Lawrence Phillips; Barbara B Cochrane; Charles B Eaton; Philip Greenland; Susan Hendrix; Judith Hsia; Julie R Hunt; Rebecca D Jackson; Karen C Johnson; Lewis H Kuller; Jennifer Robinson
Journal:  Menopause       Date:  2008 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.953

8.  Are changes in cardiovascular disease risk factors in midlife women due to chronological aging or to the menopausal transition?

Authors:  Karen A Matthews; Sybil L Crawford; Claudia U Chae; Susan A Everson-Rose; Mary Fran Sowers; Barbara Sternfeld; Kim Sutton-Tyrrell
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2009-12-15       Impact factor: 24.094

9.  A prospective study of weight gain after premenopausal hysterectomy.

Authors:  Patricia G Moorman; Joellen M Schildkraut; Edwin S Iversen; Evan R Myers; Margaret Gradison; Nicolette Warren-White; Frances Wang
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 2.681

10.  Family history of myocardial infarction predicts incident coronary heart disease in postmenopausal women with diabetes: the Women's Health Initiative Observational Study.

Authors:  Rongling Li; Mary J O'Sullivan; Jennifer Robinson; Monika M Safford; David Curb; Karen C Johnson
Journal:  Diabetes Metab Res Rev       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 4.876

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.