Literature DB >> 34110110

The frequency and clinicopathological significance of NRAS mutations in primary cutaneous nodular melanoma in Indonesia.

Hanggoro Tri Rinonce1, Deflen Jumatul Sastri1, Fita Trisnawati1, Bidari Kameswari2, Paranita Ferronika1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Melanoma is a lethal skin malignancy with a high risk of metastasis, which prompts a need for research on treatment targets and prognostic factors. Recent studies show that the presence of neuroblastoma RAS viral oncogene homolog (NRAS) mutation can influence cell growth in melanomas. The NRAS mutation, which stimulates the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling pathway, is associated with a lower survival rate. However, evidence from Indonesia population is still very rare. Further understanding of the role of NRAS mutations in Indonesian melanoma cases will be crucial in developing new management strategies for melanoma patients with NRAS mutations. AIMS: To explore the frequency of NRAS mutations and their clinicopathological associations in patients with primary nodular cutaneous melanoma in Central Java and Yogyakarta, Indonesia. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Fifty-one paraffin-embedded tissue samples were collected from primary nodular skin melanoma cases between 2011 and 2019 from the two largest referral hospitals in Yogyakarta and Central Java, Indonesia. The NRAS mutation status was evaluated using qualitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR). The association of NRAS mutation was analyzed with the following: age, gender, location, lymph node metastasis, ulceration, mitotic index, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), necrosis, tumor thickness, lymphovascular invasion (LVI), and tumor size. NRAS mutations were detected in 10 (19.6%) samples and predominantly observed (60%) in exon 2 (G12). These mutations were significantly correlated with lymph node metastases (p = .000); however, they were not associated with other variables analyzed in this study.
CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of NRAS mutations in primary nodular cutaneous melanoma cases from Indonesia is consistent with previous studies and is significantly associated with increased lymph node metastases. However, the predominant mutation detected in exon 2 (G12) is different from previous studies conducted in other countries. This suggests that melanoma cases in Javanese people have different characteristics from other ethnicities.
© 2021 The Authors. Cancer Reports published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Indonesia; NRAS mutation; RAS gene family; nodular melanoma; skin tumor

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34110110      PMCID: PMC8789608          DOI: 10.1002/cnr2.1454

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Rep (Hoboken)        ISSN: 2573-8348


INTRODUCTION

Although considered rare compared with basal and squamous cell carcinomas, melanoma is a lethal skin malignancy that has a high risk of metastasis. The incidence rate of skin melanoma varies throughout the world. In western countries, melanoma is relatively frequent, especially in light‐skinned populations. Recent research shows that the highest incidences are in Queensland, Australia, and Auckland, New Zealand. The incidence of melanoma is low in Asian populations, which is approximately 0.25 per 100 000 population in 2018, according to the Global Cancer Observatory. The prognosis of cutaneous melanoma is influenced by several clinical and histopathological factors. Clinical factors include age, sex, and anatomic location. Histopathological factors consist of Breslow tumor thickness, ulceration, Clark's anatomic level, tumor volume, growth patterns, mitosis number, radial and vertical growth phase, regression, tumor vascularity, lymphovascular invasion (LVI), angiotropism, histological type, and tumor‐infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs). Recent research shows that cell growth in melanomas is also influenced by the NRAS gene. The presence of NRAS mutations stimulates the RAS‐RAF‐extracellular signal‐regulated kinase/mitogen‐activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling pathways that can interfere with cell cycle regulation and prosurvival pathways and increase cell proliferation. NRAS mutations occur in 15%‐25% of melanoma cases, most often in exons 2 (codon 12) and 3 (codon 61). The presence of NRAS mutations was associated with a lower survival rate. Until now, no prognostic marker has been validated for melanoma. Further understanding of melanoma with NRAS mutations will be crucial in developing new management strategies for melanoma patients with NRAS mutations. The study of cutaneous nodular melanoma in Asia has been scarce because of its uncommon nature. Although the frequency is low, nodular melanoma is a major contributor to skin cancer‐related mortalities. One study conducted in Australia found nodular melanomas represented 14% of the invasive melanomas and shockingly caused 43% of the deaths. This poor outcome implores further elucidation on this particular type of melanoma. Further research concerning NRAS mutations and its associations is needed because of the lack of evidence in Indonesia. This study aimed to examine the frequency of NRAS mutations and their associations with clinicopathological properties in patients with primary nodular cutaneous melanoma in Central Java and Yogyakarta, Indonesia.

METHODS

A retrospective cross‐sectional study was conducted in the Department of Anatomical Pathology Dr. Sardjito Hospital, Sleman, Yogyakarta and Dr. Soeradji Tirtonegoro Hospital, Klaten, Central Java. Both hospitals are the major referral hospitals in Yogyakarta and Central Java Province, Indonesia. We collected and analyzed 51 paraffin‐embedded tissue samples from primary nodular cutaneous melanoma cases from 2011 to 2019. The ethnicity of the patients was Javanese, which is one of the major ethnic groups in Indonesia. The existence of NRAS mutation was examined using qualitative real‐time polymerase chain reaction (qRT‐PCR). The DNA source was collected from four slices (5 μm thickness) of formalin‐fixed paraffin‐embedded tumor tissues. Slides were examined under a microscope after deparaffinization and hematoxylin‐eosin staining. DNA was extracted from the tumor‐containing areas using GeneAll Exgene DNA Extraction Kit (GeneAll Biotechnology, Seoul, Korea) according to the instructions of the manufacturer. DNA amplification was performed using the AmoyDx NRAS Mutations Detection Kit (AmoyDx, Xiamen, China). The qRT‐PCR was used to detect 16 hotspot somatic mutations in codons 12 and 13 (exon 2), 59 and 61 (exon 3), and 117 and 146 (exon 4) of the NRAS gene. The NRAS positive control solution from the kit was used for positive control, while distilled water was used as a negative control. The clinicopathological data, including age, sex, anatomic location, lymph node metastasis, ulceration, mitosis number, TILs, necrosis, tumor thickness, LVI, and tumor size, were collected. Hematoxylin‐eosin stained slides were examined under a microscope for ulceration, tumor thickness, lymph node metastasis, LVI, necrosis, and TILs. The existence or lack of lymph node metastasis was evaluated by examining the lymph node biopsy. Tumor thickness was estimated from the granular layer to the deepest invasion of the tumor and subsequently categorized as ≤4 or >4 mm. Ulceration was defined as the combination of a full‐thickness epidermal defect (including the absence of stratum corneum and basement membrane), evidence of host response (i.e., fibrin deposition and neutrophils), and thinning, effacement, or reactive hyperplasia of the surrounding epidermis. LVI was defined as the presence of tumor cells within the blood vessel and/or lymph vessel, encasing the tumor identical to the primary cutaneous melanoma cells. Necrosis was defined as the existence of an area of necrotic cells occupying at least one‐fourth high‐power field (0.07 mm2). TILs were defined as migrating lymphocytes from the blood vessels to the surrounding tumor stroma and categorized into present or absent. Non‐brisk and brisk TILs are classified into present category. Tumor size was measured from the length of the larger axis in millimeters after formalin tissue fixation. , Immunohistochemistry was performed using a manual method from ScyTek Laboratories (ScyTek Laboratories Inc., Utah, USA). In this study, we used the CellMarque Ki‐67 (SP6) monoclonal antibody (Sigma‐Aldrich Co., Oakville, Canada). Tonsil tissue slides were used as a positive control. Paraffin blocks were sliced as thick as 3 μm, incubated, deparaffinized, and rehydrated. Antigen retrieval was conducted using Tris EDTA solution (Vivantis Inc., California, USA) at pH 9 for 20 min at 95°C. Slides were submerged for 15‐20 min in 3% hydrogen peroxide, soaked in primary antibody for 60 min, labeled with horseradish peroxidase polymer for 10‐20 min and diaminobenzidine for 3 min. Finally, slides were counterstained using hematoxylin for 0.5‐1 min and then covered by the coverslips. The mitotic index was counted based on the percentage of positively stained nuclei per 1000 tumor cells and then categorized as <20% and ≥20%. The associations between NRAS mutation status and clinicopathological parameters were analyzed using the chi‐squared or Fisher's exact tests.

RESULTS

The subjects' mean age was 63 years, ranging from 21 to 95 years. Of patients, 17 (33%) were men and 34 (67%) women. The tumors were found in the extremities in 41 subjects (80%), whereas the rest were in the trunk, head, and neck (centrally located). Out of 51 subjects, NRAS mutations were seen in 10 (19.6%) samples, and of these, mutations in exons 2 (G12) and 3 (Q61) were detected in 6 (60%) and 4 patients (40%), respectively. The association between NRAS mutation and the clinicopathological parameters is shown in Table 1. Representative results of Ki‐67 proliferative index measurement are shown in Figure 1. NRAS mutation was highly correlated with lymph node metastasis (p = .000). No significant association was found between NRAS mutation and other variables analyzed in this study.
TABLE 1

The association between NRAS mutation and clinicopathological parameters

NRAS (+) NRAS (−) p value
Age category (years), n (%)
≤656 (12)20 (39).726
>654 (8)21 (41)
Sex, n (%)
Male3 (6)14 (27)1.000
Female7 (14)27 (53)
Anatomic location, n (%)
Extremity9 (18)32 (63).664
Central1 (2)9 (17)
Lymph node metastases, n (%)
Present10 (20)15 (29) .000
Absent0 (0)26 (51)
Tumor thickness (mm), n (%)
≤40 (0)7 (14).320
>410 (20)34 (66)
Ulceration, n (%)
Present5 (10)26 (51).586
Absent5 (10)15 (29)
Mitotic index category, n (%)
≥20%6 (12)19 (37).499
<20%4 (8)22 (43)
Necrosis, n (%)
Present9 (18)23 (45).069
Absent1 (2)18 (35)
Lymphovascular invasion, n (%)
Present3 (6)11 (21)1.000
Absent7 (14)30 (59)
Tumor‐infiltrating lymphocytes, n (%)
Present8 (16)31 (60)1.000
Absent2 (4)10 (20)
Tumor size (mm)
≤63 (6)16 (31).725
>67 (14)25 (49)

Note: Significant values are shown in bold.

A p‐value < .05 was defined as significant.

FIGURE 1

Representative results of Ki‐67 immunohistochemical staining with 400× magnification of the tissue slides with varying mitotic indexes: 8% (A), 23% (B), and 41% (C). Scale bar represents 50 μm

The association between NRAS mutation and clinicopathological parameters Note: Significant values are shown in bold. A p‐value < .05 was defined as significant. Representative results of Ki‐67 immunohistochemical staining with 400× magnification of the tissue slides with varying mitotic indexes: 8% (A), 23% (B), and 41% (C). Scale bar represents 50 μm

DISCUSSION

Melanoma incidence in the last 50 years has increased significantly from 8.2 to 9.4 cases per 100 000 population in 1975 to 24.2 to 35.4 cases in 2010 in the United States. The mortality rate caused by melanoma is high, approximately 79% in the United States. Of the total 70 230 patients diagnosed with skin melanoma in 2011, 8790 died from the disease. The prognosis of melanoma patients is influenced by several clinical and histopathological factors. Clinical factors include age, sex, and anatomic location, whereas histopathological factors consist of tumor thickness, ulceration, anatomic level, LVI, growth pattern, tumor volume, mitosis number, histological subtype, regression, radial and vertical growth phase, tumor vascularity, angiotropism, and TILs. In this study, NRAS mutation was observed in 19.6% of subjects. This result is consistent with previous studies showing that NRAS mutation rates in skin melanoma cases in Asia, Europe, Africa, Australia, and America ranged from 10% to 26% (Table 2). We found that the NRAS mutation prevalence was evidently higher than the BRAF mutation in Indonesia. Previous studies demonstrated that NRAS mutations occur more commonly in nodular subtype melanomas than in other subtypes and often develop in the skin with continuous ultraviolet exposure.
TABLE 2

Summary of NRAS mutation in primary or metastatic melanoma worldwide

Continent and referencesCountry NRAS mutation prevalence (n positive/n total [%])Mutation profileMethodMelanoma
Exon 2 (G12 or G13) [%]Exon 3 (Q61) [%]
Asia
Sheen et al 13 Taiwan12/119 (10.1)16.783.3Sanger sequencingCutaneous
Choi et al 14 Korea0/22 (0)00Sanger sequencingMucosal and cutaneous
Sakaizawa et al 15 Japan21/171 (12.3)NA76.2Sanger sequencingMucosal and cutaneous
Yilmaz et al 16 Turkey10/47 (21.3)0100Sanger sequencingCutaneous
Lyu et al 17 China0/57 (0)00Sanger sequencingOral mucosal
Uhara et al 18 Japan9/127 (7.1)22.277.8Sanger sequencingMucosal and cutaneous
Si et al 19 China31/432 (7.1)2958Sanger sequencingMucosal and cutaneous
Present study (2020)Indonesia10/51 (19.6)6040RT‐PCRCutaneous
Europe
Heppt et al 20 German53/217 (24.4)5.686.8Sanger sequencingMucosal and cutaneous
Van Engen‐Van Grunsven et al 21 Netherlands4/24 (16.6)2575Sanger sequencingFemale urogenital mucosal
Zebary et al 22 Sweden8/56 (14.3)5050Sanger sequencingSinonasal mucosal
Colombino et al 23 Italy15/102 (14.7)0100Sanger sequencingCutaneous
Manrique‐Silva et al 24 Spain65/563 (11.5)13.872.3Sanger sequencingCutaneous
America
Jakob et al 5 USA136/677 (20.1)17.682.4Sanger sequencingMucosal and cutaneous
Goel et al 25 USA10/60 (16.7)0100Sanger sequencingCutaneous
Africa
Akslen et al 26 Tanzania26/118 (22.0)19.280.8Sanger sequencingCutaneous
Australia
Jones et al 27 New Zealand124/466 (26.6)7.392.7Sanger sequencingMucosal and cutaneous
Carlino et al 28 Australia39/193 (20.2)15.484.6Sequenom OncoCarta PanelMetastatic

Abbreviations: NA, not available data; RT‐PCR, real‐time polymerase chain reaction.

Summary of NRAS mutation in primary or metastatic melanoma worldwide Abbreviations: NA, not available data; RT‐PCR, real‐time polymerase chain reaction. In this study, all tumor samples were from Asian races, specifically Javanese ethnicity, which is the most common ethnic group in Indonesia. Since Indonesia is located on the equator, high‐intensity sunlight is continuously present throughout the year, which may cause skin damage because of the high cumulative sun damage (CSD), particularly in older people. Melanomas that arise due to sun exposure are generally dominated by NF1 and NRAS mutations. , The sun exposure is also related to the acral lentiginous type of melanoma, which generally has a thin tumor thickness. This study also showed that NRAS mutation was predominantly present in exon 2 (G12). This finding contradicts some previous studies that demonstrated that the predominant site of NRAS mutation is in exon 3 (Q61). , , This discrepancy might be due to differences in the characteristics of the sample population used among different studies. Bucheit et al reported that NRAS exon 2 (G12) mutations are more common in mucosal melanomas and NRAS exon 3 (Q61) mutations in nodular and superficial spreading melanomas. The Bucheit study sample numbered 136, but only 58 (42%) samples were a combination of nodular type melanoma and superficial spreading, and 50 samples (86%) were with mutations in exon 3 (Q61). In this study, we used samples from nodular type melanoma only. In this study, we found a significant association between lymph node metastasis and NRAS mutation. This finding is in concordance with the results of the study by Sheen et al that revealed that melanoma with NRAS mutations has the nature and pattern of aggressive growth. This group of melanoma tends to develop lymph node and even distant metastases. Sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy is a mandatory procedure to achieve sufficient data about lymph node metastasis even with a small number of samples. SLN positivity itself has been accepted as a prognostic factor for tumor recurrence and poor prognosis. NRAS‐mutant tumors are likely to act aggressively, especially in the early stages in the high‐risk melanoma population. In our study, 45 (88%) patients had lymph node metastasis. Accordingly, most of the patients had a higher risk of recurrence and poor prognosis. All patients with NRAS mutation had lymph node metastasis, proving that this mutation has an important role in more aggressive tumor behavior. We found a predominance of female patients in our study. Some studies show that women who suffer from melanoma have a good prognosis, even patients with lymph node metastasis. The gender influence in the prognosis of the disease is related to differences in thickness, ulceration, and anatomic location of the melanoma between women and men. The presentation of melanoma is thinner, and ulceration is less common in women than in men. Thicker tumors tend to have higher mitotic rates. This study demonstrated no statistically significant association between NRAS mutations and anatomic locations. In a previous study by Sheen et al in Taiwan with 119 samples, the extremities were the most common location for melanomas. Lee et al also found the same finding in the United Kingdom with 1972 patients observed. NRAS mutation was significantly associated with tumor location, especially the extremities. In this study, we found no significant between the existence or lack of NRAS mutation and age, gender, and anatomical site. This result differs from the previous study by Sheen et al in Taiwan, which showed that NRAS mutation is associated with older age and caused by CSD. Several other factors that can trigger melanoma include geographical location, vitamin D deficiency, and unhealthy lifestyle habits such as smoking. Vitamin D deficiency may increase NRAS mutations. A study conducted in Indonesia showed that women of childbearing age (18‐40 years) had an average serum 25(OH)D level of 48 nmol/L with a prevalence of vitamin D deficiency of 63%. Women of childbearing age in Indonesia, who often work in the house, have a higher risk of low 25(OH)D serum levels. Habitual factors such as the use of sunscreens also affect the absorption of vitamin D by the skin, resulting in vitamin D deficiency, which can increase the occurrence of NRAS mutations in young women. This study revealed no statistically significant association between NRAS mutations and tumor size, mitotic index, ulceration, TIL, necrosis, LVI, and tumor thickness. This evidence is consistent with previous studies. , Moreno‐Ramírez et al study found that there was a moderate correlation between tumor size and Breslow thickness, but there are no studies linking tumor size with NRAS mutation status in patients with melanoma. The study by Jakob stated that this could occur since the data were collected retrospectively, which identified only patients with distant metastatic conditions, whereas this research focused on primary melanoma, specifically the cutaneous nodular subtype. Our study has some limitations because the small sample population was chosen retrospectively.

CONCLUSIONS

NRAS mutations were seen in 19.6% of primary nodular subtype of cutaneous melanoma cases in Yogyakarta and Central Java Province, Indonesia, which is consistent with data worldwide. We found the predominance of NRAS mutation in exon 2 (G12) in 60% of subjects, which is different from other studies. The existence of the NRAS mutation is significantly correlated with lymph node metastasis. Further study using state‐of‐the‐art methods such as next‐generation sequencing is needed to specify a more complete mutational profile of NRAS and other genes of the MAPK pathway in Asian populations, including Indonesian.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

Conceptualization; data curation; formal analysis; funding acquisition; investigation; methodology; resources; software; supervision; validation; visualization; writing‐original draft; writing‐review & editing, H.R.; Data curation; formal analysis; investigation; methodology; project administration; validation; writing‐original draft; writing‐review & editing, D.S. and F.T.; Data curation; formal analysis; investigation; project administration; resources; supervision; validation; writing‐review & editing, B.K.; Formal analysis; investigation; methodology; supervision; validation; writing‐review & editing, P.F.; Formal analysis; investigation; methodology; resources; supervision; validation; writing‐review & editing, I.

ETHICS STATEMENT

The study protocol was reviewed and approved by the Medical and Health Research Ethics Committee of Faculty of Medicine, Public Health and Nursing, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia (letter‐number KE/FK/1016/EC/2019). Informed consent for usage of tissue samples for research was obtained preoperatively from the patients in written form.
  35 in total

1.  NRAS mutation status is an independent prognostic factor in metastatic melanoma.

Authors:  John A Jakob; Roland L Bassett; Chaan S Ng; Jonathan L Curry; Richard W Joseph; Gladys C Alvarado; Michelle L Rohlfs; Jessie Richard; Jeffrey E Gershenwald; Kevin B Kim; Alexander J Lazar; Patrick Hwu; Michael A Davies
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2011-12-16       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 2.  Assessing Tumor-infiltrating Lymphocytes in Solid Tumors: A Practical Review for Pathologists and Proposal for a Standardized Method From the International Immunooncology Biomarkers Working Group: Part 1: Assessing the Host Immune Response, TILs in Invasive Breast Carcinoma and Ductal Carcinoma In Situ, Metastatic Tumor Deposits and Areas for Further Research.

Authors:  Shona Hendry; Roberto Salgado; Thomas Gevaert; Prudence A Russell; Tom John; Bibhusal Thapa; Michael Christie; Koen van de Vijver; M V Estrada; Paula I Gonzalez-Ericsson; Melinda Sanders; Benjamin Solomon; Cinzia Solinas; Gert G G M Van den Eynden; Yves Allory; Matthias Preusser; Johannes Hainfellner; Giancarlo Pruneri; Andrea Vingiani; Sandra Demaria; Fraser Symmans; Paolo Nuciforo; Laura Comerma; E A Thompson; Sunil Lakhani; Seong-Rim Kim; Stuart Schnitt; Cecile Colpaert; Christos Sotiriou; Stefan J Scherer; Michail Ignatiadis; Sunil Badve; Robert H Pierce; Giuseppe Viale; Nicolas Sirtaine; Frederique Penault-Llorca; Tomohagu Sugie; Susan Fineberg; Soonmyung Paik; Ashok Srinivasan; Andrea Richardson; Yihong Wang; Ewa Chmielik; Jane Brock; Douglas B Johnson; Justin Balko; Stephan Wienert; Veerle Bossuyt; Stefan Michiels; Nils Ternes; Nicole Burchardi; Stephen J Luen; Peter Savas; Frederick Klauschen; Peter H Watson; Brad H Nelson; Carmen Criscitiello; Sandra O'Toole; Denis Larsimont; Roland de Wind; Giuseppe Curigliano; Fabrice André; Magali Lacroix-Triki; Mark van de Vijver; Federico Rojo; Giuseppe Floris; Shahinaz Bedri; Joseph Sparano; David Rimm; Torsten Nielsen; Zuzana Kos; Stephen Hewitt; Baljit Singh; Gelareh Farshid; Sibylle Loibl; Kimberly H Allison; Nadine Tung; Sylvia Adams; Karen Willard-Gallo; Hugo M Horlings; Leena Gandhi; Andre Moreira; Fred Hirsch; Maria V Dieci; Maria Urbanowicz; Iva Brcic; Konstanty Korski; Fabien Gaire; Hartmut Koeppen; Amy Lo; Jennifer Giltnane; Marlon C Rebelatto; Keith E Steele; Jiping Zha; Kenneth Emancipator; Jonathan W Juco; Carsten Denkert; Jorge Reis-Filho; Sherene Loi; Stephen B Fox
Journal:  Adv Anat Pathol       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 3.875

3.  Mutation scanning of BRAF, NRAS, KIT, and GNAQ/GNA11 in oral mucosal melanoma: a study of 57 cases.

Authors:  Jiong Lyu; Yunteng Wu; Chaojun Li; Runxiang Wang; Hao Song; Guoxin Ren; Wei Guo
Journal:  J Oral Pathol Med       Date:  2015-09-24       Impact factor: 4.253

4.  BRAF/NRAS mutation frequencies among primary tumors and metastases in patients with melanoma.

Authors:  Maria Colombino; Mariaelena Capone; Amelia Lissia; Antonio Cossu; Corrado Rubino; Vincenzo De Giorgi; Daniela Massi; Ester Fonsatti; Stefania Staibano; Oscar Nappi; Elena Pagani; Milena Casula; Antonella Manca; Mariacristina Sini; Renato Franco; Gerardo Botti; Corrado Caracò; Nicola Mozzillo; Paolo A Ascierto; Giuseppe Palmieri
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-05-21       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  The 2018 World Health Organization Classification of Cutaneous, Mucosal, and Uveal Melanoma: Detailed Analysis of 9 Distinct Subtypes Defined by Their Evolutionary Pathway.

Authors:  David E Elder; Boris C Bastian; Ian A Cree; Daniela Massi; Richard A Scolyer
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  2020-02-14       Impact factor: 5.534

Review 6.  Staging and prognosis of cutaneous melanoma.

Authors:  Paxton V Dickson; Jeffrey E Gershenwald
Journal:  Surg Oncol Clin N Am       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 3.495

Review 7.  Treatment of NRAS-mutant melanoma.

Authors:  Douglas B Johnson; Igor Puzanov
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2015-04

Review 8.  Melanoma prognostic factors found in the dermatopathology report.

Authors:  Michael J Payette; Marilyn Katz; Jane M Grant-Kels
Journal:  Clin Dermatol       Date:  2009 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.541

9.  KIT, NRAS and BRAF mutations in sinonasal mucosal melanoma: a study of 56 cases.

Authors:  A Zebary; M Jangard; K Omholt; B Ragnarsson-Olding; J Hansson
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2013-07-16       Impact factor: 7.640

Review 10.  NRAS-mutant melanoma: current challenges and future prospect.

Authors:  Eva Muñoz-Couselo; Ester Zamora Adelantado; Carolina Ortiz; Jesús Soberino García; José Perez-Garcia
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2017-08-08       Impact factor: 4.147

View more
  1 in total

1.  The frequency and clinicopathological significance of NRAS mutations in primary cutaneous nodular melanoma in Indonesia.

Authors:  Hanggoro Tri Rinonce; Deflen Jumatul Sastri; Fita Trisnawati; Bidari Kameswari; Paranita Ferronika
Journal:  Cancer Rep (Hoboken)       Date:  2021-06-10
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.