Literature DB >> 34110022

PD components and distractor inhibition in visual search: New evidence for the signal suppression hypothesis.

Brandi Lee Drisdelle1, Martin Eimer1.   

Abstract

The hypothesis that salient distractors in visual search are actively suppressed is supported by the fact that these objects elicit PD components believed to be associated with inhibition. This account was challenged by researchers who found that a PD to lateral color singleton distractors was followed by a contralateral negativity, which they interpreted as an N2pc indicative of attentional capture. As this would be at odds with successful distractor suppression, they proposed an alternative lateral-first serial scanning hypothesis, which assumes that the PD might actually be an N2pc elicited when a lateral context item is selected. We tested this hypothesis by measuring lateralized ERP components to search displays with two lateral and two vertical midline items, including a color singleton and a shape-defined target. Color singletons triggered PD components not only in blocks where attention was unfocused because target location was unpredictable, but critically also in blocks where targets only appeared on the midline and participants had no reason to attend to lateral items. This is inconsistent with the serial scanning hypothesis and supports the idea that the PD reflects signal suppression. PD components to singleton distractors were followed by a contralateral negativity, which we interpreted as a second PD elicited by nonsalient distractors on the opposite side. Our sequential inhibition account reconciles conflicting results of recent studies and emphasizes the role of inhibitory processes during attentional target selection in visual search.
© 2021 Society for Psychophysiological Research.

Entities:  

Keywords:  PD component; attentional capture; event-related brain potentials (ERP); inhibition; signal suppression hypothesis

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34110022     DOI: 10.1111/psyp.13878

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychophysiology        ISSN: 0048-5772            Impact factor:   4.016


  5 in total

1.  Difficulty suppressing visual distraction while dual tasking.

Authors:  John J McDonald; John M Gaspar; Hayley E P Lagroix; Pierre Jolicœur
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2022-08-24

2.  On preventing attention capture: Is singleton suppression actually singleton suppression?

Authors:  Mei-Ching Lien; Eric Ruthruff; Christopher Hauck
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2021-09-24

3.  Does attentional suppression occur at the level of perception or decision-making? Evidence from Gaspelin et al.'s (2015) probe letter task.

Authors:  Dirk Kerzel; Olivier Renaud
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2022-09-12

4.  Learned distractor rejection persists across target search in a different dimension.

Authors:  Brad T Stilwell; Shaun P Vecera
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2022-08-31       Impact factor: 2.157

5.  Eye movements reveal the contributions of early and late processes of enhancement and suppression to the guidance of visual search.

Authors:  Zachary Hamblin-Frohman; Seah Chang; Howard Egeth; Stefanie I Becker
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2022-07-20       Impact factor: 2.157

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.