| Literature DB >> 34109749 |
Xiao-Rong Liu1, Ting-Ting Ye1, Wen-Jun Zhang1, Xuan Guo1, Jie Wang1, Shao-Ping Huang2, Long-Shan Xie3, Xing-Wang Song1, Wei-Wen Deng1, Bing-Mei Li1, Na He1, Qian-Yi Wu1, Min-Zhi Zhuang1, Meng Xu1, Yi-Wu Shi1, Tao Su1, Yong-Hong Yi1, Wei-Ping Liao1.
Abstract
AIMS: CHD4 gene, encoding chromodomain helicase DNA-binding protein 4, is a vital gene for fetal development. In this study, we aimed to explore the association between CHD4 variants and idiopathic epilepsy.Entities:
Keywords: CHD4 gene; childhood idiopathic epilepsy; sinus arrhythmia
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34109749 PMCID: PMC8446219 DOI: 10.1111/cns.13692
Source DB: PubMed Journal: CNS Neurosci Ther ISSN: 1755-5930 Impact factor: 5.243
FIGURE 1Genetic data on the patients with childhood idiopathic epilepsy with CHD4 mutations. (A) Pedigrees of the four cases with CHD4 mutations and their corresponding phenotypes. FS: febrile seizures; EFS+: epilepsy with febrile seizures; CAE: childhood absence epilepsy; BECTS: benign childhood epilepsy with centrotemporal EEG spikes. (B) DNA sequence chromatogram of the CHD4 mutations. Arrows indicate the positions of the mutations. (C) The amino acid sequence alignment of the four missense mutations shows that the residues are highly conserved across vertebrates
Clinical Features of the Individuals with CHD4 Mutations
| Case | Variants (NM_001273.3) | Diagnosis | Gender | Age | Seizure onset | Seizure course | EEG | Sinus arrhythmia | Brain MRI | Development | Effective AEDs | Prognosis | MAF in GnomAD | ACMG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Case 1–1 | c.856C>G/p.P286A | EFS+ | Male | 11 years | FS at 4 months; CPS at 6 years | FS twice before 2 years; CPS and sGTCS twice /year for 4 years | Normal | + | Normal | Normal | VPA | Sz free 1 year | 4.09 × 10−6 (0 in controls) | US (PP1+PP3) |
| Case 1–2 (B) | c.856C>G/p.P286A | FS | Male | 11 years | 2 years | FS once at 2 years | NA | NA | Normal | Normal | ‐ | Sz free 9 years | ||
| Case 1–3 (F) | c.856C>G/p.P286A | ‐ | Male | 46 years | ‐ | ‐ | NA | + | NA | Normal | ‐ | ‐ | ||
| Case 2 | c.1597A>G/p.K533E | EFS+ | Male | 10 years | Febrile and afebrile GTCS at 2 years | GTCS 5–6 times/year for 4 years | Right frontotemporal spike‐slow wave and generalized slow waves | + | Normal | Normal | VPA | Sz free 4 years | ‐ | LP (PS2+PM2+PP3) |
| Case 3 | c.4936G>A/p.E1646K | CAE | Female | 9 years | 6 years | GTCS 2 times/year and absence daily for 1 year | Generalized 3 Hz spike‐slow waves | + | Normal | Normal | LTG 25 mg bid | Sz free 3 years | ‐ | LP (PS2+PM2+PP3) |
| Case 4–1 | c.4977C>G/p.D1659E | BECTS | Male | 15 years | 8 years | GTCS 1–2 times/year for 2 years | Bilateral controtemportal spike‐slow waves | + | Normal | Borderline | LTG 62.5 mg bid, VPA 0.25 bid | Sz free 5 years | ‐ | US (PM2+PP1+PP3) |
| Case 4–2 (B) | c.4977C>G/p.D1659E | ‐ | Male | 15 years | ‐ | ‐ | Generalized spike‐slow waves | + | NA | Normal | ‐ | ‐ | ||
| Case 4–3 (F) | c.4977C>G/p.D1659E | ‐ | Male | 45 years | ‐ | ‐ | NA | + | NA | Borderline | ‐ | ‐ |
Abbreviations: AEDs, antiepileptic drugs; B, brother; BECTS, benign childhood epilepsy with centrotemporal EEG spikes; CAE, childhood absence epilepsy; CPS, complex partial seizure; EEG, electroencephalogram; EFS+, epilepsy with febrile seizure plus; F, father; FS, febrile seizure; GTCS, generalized tonic‐clonic seizure; LP, likely pathogenesis; LTG, lamotrigine; MAF, minor allele frequency from gnomAD; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; NA, not available; sGTCS, secondary generalized tonic‐clonic seizure; Sz, seizure; US, uncertain significant; VPA, valproate.
FIGURE 2Changes in ECG, color Doppler ultrasound, and interictal EEG in the cases with CHD4 mutations. (A and B) Interictal EEG of case 2 showed right frontotemporal spike and slow waves (A) and irregular generalized slow waves (B) with sinus arrhythmia (obtained at the age of 9 years). (C) Interictal EEG of case 3 showed intermittent high‐voltage 3 Hz spike and slow waves with sinus arrhythmia (obtained at the age of 6 years and after valproate treatment). (D) Interictal EEG of case 4 showed bilateral controtemportal spike‐slow waves with sinus arrhythmia (obtained at the age of 8 years). The arrows index the sinus premature beats during the ECG and video‐EEG monitoring. (E) ECG of case 1 showed distinct sinus arrhythmia (obtained at the age of 10 years). (F) Color Doppler ultrasound of case 1 showed mild aortic valve regurgitation (obtained at the age of 11 years)
FIGURE 3Schematic illustration of mutation and interactions with surrounding amino acids. (A) Schematic diagram of CHD4 and the localization of the CHD4 mutations identified in this study. (B) Hydrogen bond changes in mutants P286, K533, E1646, and D1659
FIGURE 4Schematic diagram of missense CHD4 mutations and their locations on CHD4. Locations of the missense mutations with explicit phenotypes were indicated on the structure of CHD4. Mutations associated with non‐Sifrim‐Hitz‐Weiss syndrome were shown at the top of the structural diagram. Mutations associated with Sifrim‐Hitz‐Weiss syndrome were shown at the bottom
Evaluating the Clinical Validity of CHD4‐Epilepsy Associations Based on the Framework Developed by the Clinical Genome Resource
| Evidence type | Case information | Suggested points/Case | Points given | Max score | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Default | Range | ||||||||
| Case‐level data | Variant evidence | Autosomal dominant OR X‐linked disorder | Variant is de novo | 2 | 0–3 | 4 | 12 | ||
| Proband with predicted or proven null variant | 1.5 | 0–2 | 0 | 10 | |||||
| Proband with other variant type with some evidence of gene impact | 0.5 | 0–1.5 | 2.3 | 7 | |||||
| Autosomal recessive | Two variants in trans and at least one de novo or a predicted/proven null variant | 2 | 0.3 | ‐ | 12 | ||||
| Two variants (not predicted/proven null) with some evidence of gene impact in trans | 1 | 0–1.5 | ‐ | ||||||
| Segregation evidence | Evidence of segregation in one or more families | LOD Score Example | 3 | 5 | 0–7 | 0 | 7 | ||
| 2 | 4 | ||||||||
| 1.5 | 3 | ||||||||
| 1 | 0.5 | ||||||||
| Case‐control data | Case‐control study type | Case‐control quality criteria | Suggested points/Study | Points given | Max score | ||||
| Single variant analysis |
Variant Detection Methodology Power Bias and Confounding Factors Statistical Significance | 0–6 | ‐ | 12 | |||||
| Aggregate variant analysis | 0–6 | 6 | |||||||
| Total allowable points for genetic evidence | 6.3 | 12 | |||||||
Two de novo missense variants. (2 pts/case × 2 cases).
The four variants in the present study were all low MAF. Three of four variants did not appear in gnomAD database. (0.1 pts/case × 4 cases). The four variants were predicted damaging by multiple in silico programs. (0.4 pts/case × 4 cases). Three variants were predicted to change hydrogen bonds based on 3D structure. (0.1 pts/case × 3cases).
This is an aggregate analysis. Comparing to allele number in gnomAD‐control populations and in controls of gnomAD‐East Asian populations, the frequency of the variants in the present cohort is significant higher (Table S2). (Assigned 6 pts.). The points are not included in total allowable points for genetic evidence.
CHD4 protein belongs to the SNF2/RAD54 helicase family, and acts as one of the motor subunit of the NuRD complex (nucleosome remodeling and deacetylase activities) that is one of the major transcriptional repressors influencing different physiological conditions or different cell/tissue types. Several members of the SNF2/RAD54 helicase family (CHD2, CHD3, and CHD7) were associated with epilepsy and neurodevelopmental disorders. (Assigned 0.5 pts.).
CHD4 protein is one of the motor subunits of the NuRD complex, in which CHD4 protein combines with GATAD2B. The mutations in GATAD2B gene were associated with epilepsy (Shieh C, 2020. PMID: 31949314). (Assigned 0.5 pts.).
CHD4 gene is ubiquitously expressed across the whole lifespan, including brain. (Assigned 0.5 pts.).
Alterations in ATP hydrolysis and chromatin remodeling activities were observed in CHD4 mutant HEK293 cells. (Weiss K, 2019. PMID: 31388190) (Assigned 0.5pts.).
Mice homozygous for CHD4 null alleles exhibited embryonic lethality before implantation, abnormal extraembryonic tissue physiology, absent blastocoele, and increased apoptosis. (MGI:1344380). (Assigned 3 pts.).
In mammalian cells, CHD4 exhibited strong nuclear localization patterns, and rapidly recruited to DNA repairs sites, which revealed a subset of specific target genes (Hoffmeister H, 2017. PMID: 28977666). (Assigned 1 pt.).