| Literature DB >> 34107907 |
Patricia Atencio1, Alfonso Cabello2, Aránzazu Mediero3, Miguel Górgolas1, Francisco M Conesa-Buendía3, Ramón Pérez-Tanoira1, Laura Prieto-Pérez1, Irene Carrillo1, Beatriz Álvarez1, Rosa Arboiro-Pinel4, Manuel Díaz-Curiel4, Gabriel Herrero-Beaumont3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Low BMD (bone mineral density) has been described as a non-AIDS (Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome)-related event in HIV (human immunodeficiency virus)-patients but it is poorly studied in young HIV-infected men who have received no previous antiretroviral therapy.Entities:
Keywords: BMD; Bone comorbidity; DXA; HIV; Naïve patients
Year: 2021 PMID: 34107907 PMCID: PMC8188666 DOI: 10.1186/s12879-021-06263-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Infect Dis ISSN: 1471-2334 Impact factor: 3.090
Main characteristics of patients (p)
| | 100% |
| | 0% |
| 100% | |
| 36.4(IQR: 30–40) | |
| | 68% |
| | 29.3% |
| | 2.7% |
| | 91% |
| | 6% |
| | 3% |
| 32.62% | |
| 481 cells/μL (IQR: 320–659) | |
| 10% | |
| 41% | |
| 1.22% | |
| 0.4% | |
| 3.3 months | |
Normal (> − 2): 77.2% (189 p) Low BMD (<−2.0): 22.8% (56 p) | |
Fig. 1Risk factors associated with bone comorbidity in HIV patients. The figure represents the percentage of incidence of each of the risk factors analyzed in the study population
Comparative analysis of linear correlation between Z-Score in LS and baseline parameters studied in HIV patients. The following table summarizes the results of these models using the coefficient (coef.), their 95% confidence interval (95% CI), and the p-value. P < 0.05 = significant
| Age | −0.002 | (−0.018, 0.015) | 0.847 |
| BMI | 0.000 | (−0.001, 0.000) | 0.546 |
| Ca | −0.110 | (−0.463, 0.243) | 0.539 |
| P | −0.049 | (−0.240, 0.142) | 0.613 |
| Vit. D | 0.012 | (−0.013, 0.036) | 0.344 |
| Albumin | −0.283 | (−0.770, 0.205) | 0.254 |
| CD4 | −0.012 | (−0.063, 0.039) | 0.644 |
| CD8 | 0.030 | (0.004, 0.055) | 0.022 |
| CD4/CD8 ratio | −0.588 | (−1.092, − 0.084) | 0.022 |
| Viral load | 0.000 | (−0.131, 0.131) | 0.997 |
| Yes | 0.140 | (−0.179, 0.460) | 0.387 |
| Yes | 0.016 | (−0.462, 0.495) | 0.946 |
| Yes | 0.092 | (−0.269, 0.452) | 0.617 |
| B | 0.145 | (−0.459, 0.749) | 0.636 |
| C | 0.017 | (−0.825, 0.858) | 0.969 |
| No | 0.258 | (−0.644, 1.161) | 0.571 |
| < 200 | 0.173 | (−0.282, 0.629) | 0.454 |
| < 0.4 | 0.368 | (0.084, 0.653) | 0.011 |
| High | 0.223 | (−0.168, 0.613) | 0.262 |
Comparative analysis of linear correlation between Z-Score in FN and baseline parameters studied in HIV patients. The following table summarizes the results of these models using the coefficient (coef.), their 95% confidence interval (95% CI), and the p-value. P < 0.05 = significant
| Age | 0.013 | (−0.001, 0.026) | 0.061 |
| BMI | 0.000 | (−0.000, 0.001) | 0.207 |
| Ca | −0.098 | (−0.394, 0.198) | 0.515 |
| P | −0.074 | (−0.234, 0.087) | 0.366 |
| Vit. D | 0.013 | (−0.004, 0.030) | 0.124 |
| Albumin | 0.110 | (−0.301, 0.521) | 0.599 |
| CD4 | −0.015 | (−0.057, 0.028) | 0.497 |
| CD8 | 0.013 | (−0.009, 0.034) | 0.239 |
| CD4/CD8 ratio | −0.385 | (−0.808, 0.038) | 0.074 |
| Viral Load | −0.049 | (−0.162, 0.065) | 0.397 |
| Yes | 0.249 | (−0.020, 0.518) | 0.069 |
| Yes | −0.561 | (−0.957, − 0.165) | 0.006 |
| Yes | −0.006 | (−0.327, 0.315) | 0.970 |
| B | 0.134 | (−0.377, 0.644) | 0.606 |
| C | 0.033 | (−0.653, 0.719) | 0.924 |
| No | 0.529 | (−0.026, 1.084) | 0.062 |
| < 200 | 0.252 | (−0.139, 0.644) | 0.205 |
| < 0.4 | 0.198 | (−0.044, 0.440) | 0.108 |
| High | 0.073 | (−0.289, 0.434) | 0.692 |
Comparative analysis of logistic correlation between Z-Score (qualitative binary variable: normal range or non-normal range) and baseline parameters studied in HIV patients. The following table summarizes the results of these models using the odds ratio (OR), their 95% confidence interval (95% CI), and the p-value. P < 0.05 = significant
| Age | 1.01 | (0.97, 1.04) | 0.764 |
| BMI | 1.00 | (1.00, 1.00) | 0.691 |
| Ca | 1.25 | (0.58, 2.72) | 0.578 |
| P | 1.26 | (0.84, 1.91) | 0.246 |
| Vit. D | 0.98 | (0.93, 1.03) | 0.345 |
| Albumin | 0.86 | (0.30, 2.50) | 0.776 |
| CD4 | 1.01 | (0.91, 1.13) | 0.800 |
| CD8 | 0.95 | (0.89, 1.01) | 0.123 |
| CD4/CD8 ratio | 3.41 | (1.19, 9.9) | 0.022 |
| Viral Load | 1.05 | (0.74, 1.37) | 0.726 |
| Yes | 0.62 | (0.30, 1.28) | 0.204 |
| Yes | 2.04 | (0.66, 8.95) | 0.265 |
| Yes | 0.71 | (0.28, 1.65) | 0.447 |
| B | 0.27 | (0.01, 1.44) | 0.218 |
| C | 0.55 | (0.03, 3.30) | 0.580 |
| No | 1.25 | (0.17, 6.44) | 0.801 |
| < 200 | 0.92 | (0.29, 2.44) | 0.876 |
| < 0.4 | 0.52 | (0.26, 0.99) | 0.050 |
| High | 0.60 | (0.23, 1.41) | 0.256 |