| Literature DB >> 34106603 |
Jiyeon Roh1,2, Hyo Yeong Ahn2,3, Insu Kim4, Ju Hyeong Son5, Hee Yun Seol6, Mi Hyun Kim1, Min Ki Lee1, Jung Seop Eom1,2.
Abstract
ABSTRACT: The British Thoracic Society guidelines recommend observation for patients with asymptomatic malignant pleural effusion (MPE). However, asymptomatic MPE can become symptomatic. This study examined the clinical course of asymptomatic MPE in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), including the incidence and timing of symptom development of asymptomatic MPE and the associated factors.Retrospective data of 4822 NSCLC patients between January 2012 and December 2017 were reviewed. Symptom development of asymptomatic MPE was defined as the development of symptoms requiring additional treatment, such as insertion of a chest tube, within 1 year in patients who lacked MPE symptoms at the time of diagnosis. Clinical information, pathological parameters, and radiological characteristics were reviewed. Patient data up to 1 year from the initial diagnosis were reviewed.Of 113 patients with asymptomatic MPE, 46 (41%) became symptomatic within 1 year despite appropriate anticancer treatment. The median time to symptom development was 4 months, and 38 patients (83%) developed symptoms within 6 months. Multivariate logistic regression showed that female sex (odds ratio [OR], 0.256; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.101-0.649; P = .004) and the depth of pleural effusion on initial computed tomography (CT) (OR, 0.957; 95% CI, 0.932-0.982; P = .001) were independently associated with symptom development of asymptomatic MPE.A fraction of 41% of patients with asymptomatic MPE became symptomatic within 1 year. Female sex and larger MPE on initial CT were independently associated with symptom development of asymptomatic MPE.Entities:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34106603 PMCID: PMC8133234 DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000025748
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) ISSN: 0025-7974 Impact factor: 1.889
Figure 1Chest computed tomography (CT) of MPE. (A) The depth of MPE was measured perpendicular to the parietal pleura at the site of greatest depth on axial CT images (dashed arrow). (B) CT image of MPE with pleural nodularity (arrow). (C) Chest CT showing pleural thickening with pleural enhancement (arrowhead). MPE = malignant pleural effusion.
Figure 2Flow chart of study patients. NSCLC = non-small cell lung cancer.
Baseline characteristics of 113 study patients with asymptomatic malignant pleural effusion.
| Variables | Median (IQR) or No. (%) |
| Age, y | 67 (59–74) |
| Female gender | 37 (33) |
| ECOG performance status | |
| ≤1 | 87 (77) |
| >1 | 26 (23) |
| Charlson Comorbidity Index score | |
| ≤1 | 19 (17) |
| >1 | 94 (83) |
| T stage | |
| ≤2 | 53 (47) |
| >2 | 60 (53) |
| N stage | |
| ≤1 | 28 (25) |
| >1 | 85 (75) |
| M stage | |
| 1a | 37 (33) |
| 1b | 10 (9) |
| 1c | 66 (58) |
| Number of metastatic organs involved | |
| ≤2 | 61 (54) |
| >3 | 52 (46) |
| Histology | |
| Adenocarcinoma | 85 (75) |
| Squamous cell carcinoma | 24 (21) |
| Others | 4 (4) |
| Driver mutation detected∗ | 42 (37) |
| Targeted agent as first-line treatment | 32 (28) |
| Response to first-line treatment† | |
| Partial response | 20 (18) |
| Stable disease or progressive disease | 93 (82) |
ECOG = Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group, IQR = interquartile range.
Epidermal growth factor receptor mutation or anaplastic lymphoma kinase rearrangement.
Treatment responses are expressed according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumor (RECIST 1.1).
Figure 3Time to symptom development of asymptomatic malignant pleural effusion within 1 year.
Comparisons between symptomatic and asymptomatic groups.
| Variables | Symptomatic group (n = 46) | Asymptomatic group (n = 67) | |
| Age, y | 71 (64–75) | 66 (58–73) | .008 |
| Female gender | 21 (46) | 16 (24) | .015 |
| ECOG performance status | |||
| ≤1 | 39 (85) | 48 (72) | .103 |
| >1 | 7 (15) | 19 (28) | |
| Charlson Comorbidity Index score | |||
| ≤1 | 4 (9) | 15 (22) | .056 |
| >1 | 42 (91) | 52 (78) | |
| T stage | |||
| ≤2 | 20 (43) | 33 (49) | .546 |
| >2 | 26 (57) | 34 (51) | |
| N stage | |||
| ≤1 | 9 (19) | 19 (28) | .287 |
| >1 | 37 (44) | 48 (72) | |
| M stage | |||
| 1a | 17 (37) | 20 (30) | .234 |
| 1b | 6 (13) | 4 (6) | |
| 1c | 23 (50) | 43 (64) | |
| Histology | |||
| Squamous cell carcinoma | 10 (22) | 14 (21) | .914 |
| Non-squamous cell carcinoma | 36 (78) | 53 (79) | |
| Driver mutation detected∗ | 13 (28) | 29 (43) | .104 |
| Targeted agent as first-line treatment | 11 (24) | 21 (31) | .389 |
| Median depth of MPE on CT, mm | 28 (17–44) | 19 (14–30) | .010 |
| Pleural thickening on CT | 14 (30) | 13 (19) | .177 |
| Pleural nodularity on CT | 18 (39) | 15 (22) | .054 |
| Loculation of MPE on CT | 0 (0) | 4 (5) | .146 |
CT = computed tomography, ECOG = Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group, MPE = malignant pleural effusion.
Epidermal growth factor receptor mutation or anaplastic large-cell lymphoma kinase rearrangement.
Multivariate logistic regression analysis to identify factors associated with conversion of asymptomatic malignant pleural effusion into symptomatic malignant pleural effusion.
| Variables | Odds ratio (95% confidence interval) | |
| Age (per year) | 0.445 (0.158–1.257) | .127 |
| Female gender | 0.256 (0.101–0.649) | .004 |
| Charlson Comorbidity Index score | 0.354 (0.070–1.779) | .208 |
| Depth of MPE on CT, mm | 0.957 (0.932–0.982) | .001 |
| Pleural nodularity on CT | 0.510 (0.198–1.312) | .163 |
CT = computed tomography, MPE = malignant pleural effusion.